User talk:Havvic

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Troy Davis case, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Troy Davis case was changed by Havvic (u) (t) deleting 7858 characters on 2009-01-31T06:47:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

- Peripitus (Talk) 07:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Havvic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No legitimate reason for this bullying and nothing whatsoever to apologise for. Havvic (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason for unblocking given, either. (For the record, you have been blocked for edit warring, apparently using multiple accounts.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Havvic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There has been no 'edit warring'. Talk page discussion has been pursued. And if you listen to yourself you may realise how ridiculous you sound to suggest the many persons contending against propaganda viewpoints on these pages are really just one, in order to shut them up. As you admit there is no legitimate reason for the bullyin and nothing to be apologised for, unblock

Decline reason:

Obvious sock of banned user DavidYork71. You are not welcome at Wikipedia. The sooner you realize this, the sooner you can move on with your life. - auburnpilot talk 14:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.