User talk:Hdjensofjfnen/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

This is the October 2018 archive of Hdjensofjfnen.

Ask and ye shall receive

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

 Nova Crystallis (Talk) 03:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Help request

I am learning. Thank you for the welcome. Delete this as I have no idea where it's supposed to go. Magenta30 (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Magenta30Magenta30 (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

@Magenta30: You're absolutely welcome! Talk page messages are generally posted at the bottom of the page using the "New section" button. Also, you can take a look at the talk page guidelines. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 19:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you ! ! ! Magenta30 (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

STOP CHANGING MY EDITS!!!

Stop changing my Fucking edits on TD Twenty-Three-E I don't know why its wrong to have a Fucking article about it. (Preceding unsigned comment by User:Northatlantic320)

@Northatlantic320: It doesn't meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Please stop this editing. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 16:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Hdjensofjfnen: stop changing my article then. (Preceding unsigned comment by User:Northatlantic320)

@Northatlantic320: It's not notable, and it's not your article. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 16:03, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Hdjensofjfnen: it is my article because I was the one who CREATED IT. Northatlantic320 (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC) Northatlantic320 (talk) 16:54, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

@Northatlantic320: Im also going to ask that you stop. Please do not recreate the article. The subject is not notable and there isn't enough content. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 16:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: I can recreate the article if I want even watch me do it again. Northatlantic320 (talk) 17:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: Does this require an arbitration case? Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 17:11, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Hdjensofjfnen: I warned him since he appears to be edit warring 3 people across 2 articles. If he does create the article again, report him on the admin's noticeboard for edit warring. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 17:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

The page is now fully protected for 3 days. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 17:28, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: Thanks for resolving this dispute. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 17:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: User is continuing his reverting ways, can you report him to WP:AN3? Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 18:00, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bold, revert, discuss

Wikipedia:Bold, revert, discuss is a generally agreed upon form of collaborative editing on Wikipedia. You were bold in making a change, I disagreed, and then you reverted rather than discussing. Even when another user also felt this addition was unnecessary, you continued adding it. Generally speaking, you broke the three revert rule. Please consider that instead of forcing your opinion on others, the nature of Wikipedia asks for discussion and consensus. Killiondude (talk) 19:20, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@Killiondude: Agreed, but I did discuss it via edit summary. Google Inc. was and is the former name of Alphabet Inc. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 23:32, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

If you read the page I linked, it specifically says an edit summary is not the place for discussion. Killiondude (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Willa

Hey, the preparations/impacts need to remain separate from the meteorological history information in the lead section. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 01:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: I see. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 01:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Simply has to do with how we structure articles. If the watches and warnings are later updated after the storm weakens/strengthens, it would mess up the lead. We keep them separated so if they change, it wouldnt require us to say new watches and warnings were issued at the new intensity. We can simply say they were issued for X, Y, and Z without worrying about the time of issuance. Figfires^{Send me a message!} 01:31, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

@Figfires: Thanks for clarifying. Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 19:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Signature of User:RecentEdits. B dash (talk) 03:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)