User talk:HeatIsCool

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, roadfan![edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CRWP (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INR (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! AdmrBoltz 20:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 30 split[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We're glad to have a new registered contributor!

I've noticed an unregistered user has added a split tag to the Interstate 30 article - considering you just added one the other day, and that you are a new user, I'm assuming it was you. In any case, I have reverted your split suggestion, under the grounds that you did not start a split discussion. Per WP:PROSPLIT, when suggesting an article be split, you must start a "Split" discussion in the article's talk page. Please see the Split Procedure article I've linked above.

Again, welcome! -P shadoh (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it is customary in the U.S. Roads WikiProject to only split national-level articles when the highway passes through 3+ statates. As I-30 only enters TX and AR, no state-level article would be created. --AdmrBoltz 16:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, good info for me, too! Time to read up. :) -P shadoh (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See for example: Interstate 70 with its child articles Interstate 70 in Utah, Interstate 70 in Colorado, Interstate 70 in West Virginia (all three FAs, but all states it passes through have one). Interstate 8 is an example where there is no state-specific page as it only is in CA and AZ. --AdmrBoltz 19:28, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HeatIsCool, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi HeatIsCool! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

I don't understand how to operate Lilypond on my userspace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HeatIsCool (talk • contribs) 16:03, 4 November 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Can you give more detail about what you are trying to accomplish. I'm aware of some discussions about using LilyPond for music notation on the Wiki, but I don't believe it's implemented. Are you talking about using it here on Wikipedia, or on your user space somewhere else? —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 18:25, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think the example on your user page is failing because there are no notes yet - when I added "b c d e f g" and did a "Show preview", some music appeared. Have you seen the Help:Score help page? -- John of Reading (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected. Looks like it works just fine. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 19:58, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania (August 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— kikichugirl oh hello! 03:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interstate 91 in Vermont (August 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This draft contains no prose, it consists of only an infobox.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 8 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Interstate 91 in Vermont has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Interstate 91 in Vermont. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interstate 91 in Vermont (September 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Imzadi1979 was:
Interstate 91 contains a full treatment of this topic, as well as the highway in the other two states. At the moment, there is no need to split the topic into subarticles by state.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Imzadi 1979 → 06:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using Official State Mileage Logs[edit]

Thank you for creating the Kentucky junction list for U.S. Route 460! I noticed the milepoints you are using appear to be from a mapping service like Bing or Google Maps. The Kentucky state government (specifically the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet) has an application that you can use to get the milepoints to three decimal figures. I recommend you replace the Google or Bing numbers with the official state numbers and add the source to the references. You can see an example of the resource being used and cited in Kentucky Route 12.  VC  02:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Official DMI Route Log

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2 (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was:
It is unclear what this article is about.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--  Kethrus |talk to me  01:23, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Capital MetroRapid (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--  Kethrus |talk to me  06:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Capital MetroRapid (September 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was:
Nothing has changed much since yesterday.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yann (talk) 13:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Capital MetroRapid has been accepted[edit]

Template:Capital MetroRapid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Route 59 in Kansas has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Route 59 in Kansas. Thanks! Naraht (talk) 21:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! By the way, I've already tagged the redirect for deletion, so it should be safe to delete the redirect and then accept the submission. HeatIsCool (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not an administrator so I can't delete the redirect. But I will tag any redirects on any more draft articles of this quality. :)Naraht (talk) 22:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 59 in Kansas has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 59 in Kansas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eteethan(talk)🎄 02:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Nice job on the Kansas Road article! I've gone ahead and accepted it and will be going around and adding links!

Eteethan(talk)🎄 02:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 20 in Montana has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 20 in Montana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Imzadi 1979 → 00:41, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania (December 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 01:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 62 in Illinois has been accepted[edit]

62 in Illinois, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

US 60/US 62 in IL[edit]

I've have the article moved to U.S. Route 60 in Illinois and redirected U.S. Route 62 in Illinois and U.S. Route 60/62 in Illinois there. This follows the precedent from the US 15/US 501 situation in the Carolinas. Also, you may want to revisit commenting on other users' talk pages in boldface text to chastise people about not knowing about WP:USSH. Imzadi 1979 → 03:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 64 in New Mexico has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 64 in New Mexico, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Naraht (talk) 16:36, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Segmented Interstate Highways[edit]

Category:Segmented Interstate Highways, which you requested creation of, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 05:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Route 287 in Oklahoma has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Route 287 in Oklahoma. Thanks! CatcherStorm talk 06:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania. Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania has been accepted[edit]

Interstate 84 in Pennsylvania, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 18:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 287 in Oklahoma has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 287 in Oklahoma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 231 in Tennessee has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 231 in Tennessee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LionMans Account (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

USRD drafts[edit]

Do you intend on submitting every draft I started to AfC? –Fredddie™ 00:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not actually submitting anything. I'm just adding the drafts as a "to-be-submitted" kind of draft. HeatIsCool (talk) 01:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Interstate 26 in Tennessee concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Interstate 26 in Tennessee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 287 in Colorado (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at [[:U.S. Route 287#Colorado]] instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devopam (talk) 06:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Interstate 91 in Vermont concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Interstate 91 in Vermont, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Interstate 91 in Massachusetts concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Interstate 91 in Massachusetts, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Loaded term has been accepted[edit]

Template:Loaded term, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Route 30 in West Virginia has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Route 30 in West Virginia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Interstate 26 in Tennessee[edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Interstate 26 in Tennessee".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 287 in Colorado (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at U.S. Route 287. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 02:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Loaded (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UY Scuti was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
—UY Scuti Talk 19:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Interstate 91 in Massachusetts[edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Interstate 91 in Massachusetts".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Interstate 91 in Vermont[edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Interstate 91 in Vermont".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 30 in West Virginia (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment they left was:
Unfortunately, primary or affiliated sources do not conform to the requirements for a reliable source. See WP:VRS.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 InsertCleverPhraseHere  09:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 287 in Colorado (March 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at U.S. Route 287 instead.
 The comment they left was:
Again, I see no reason why this requires its own article. Add it to the existing U.S. Route 287 article instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Joseph2302 (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:UAA report (June 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:
Please get consensus for this template at a place like WT:UAA.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CSD tag[edit]

FYI, you taggedUser talk:My coc clan lvl 10 as a G8. Please review the description. It is quite common for user pages to be nonexistent but we do not remove the user talk page for that reason. The particular page you tagged does have other issues and may well be removed but not as a G8.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:19, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Okay, thanks for clearing that up. The user page did have unconstructive writing, and because the talk page did too, I wasn't sure about it. Again, thanks. HeatIsCool 14:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the talk page content wasn't appropriate.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 82 in Mississippi (June 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fredddie was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at U.S. Route 82 instead.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A few tips for an article like this from a roads editor.
  1. Don't just copy over the text from U.S. Route 82 and call it good. Actually write something substantial; that's why the 'duplicate article in mainspace' tag applies here.
  2. There is more history to this road than two sentences. At least make an attempt.
  3. Please fill out the junction list's mileage column.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
–Fredddie™ 02:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UAA[edit]

Hi HeatIsCool! Thanks for all your work around WP:UAA. Just letting you know that reporting a user and discussing their username with them at the same time is unnecessary. Either report them straight away and don't leave them a notice, or discuss it with them and report to UAA only if your attempts are unsuccessful. Thanks again, Omni Flames (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Omni Flames: Okay, thanks very much. HeatIsCool 11:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Tagging (heh) onto this, whilst commenting on reports is appreciated, declining reports should be left to an administrator. You're right though, and as a comment this would really help us keep up the great work! -- samtar talk or stalk 17:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion[edit]

Greetings, I've declined the speedy deletion you asked for User:CakezzGaming because it isn't really a test page or abuse of the namespace as a webhost; a greeting on an user page is a very common and deliberate thing and does not need deletion. Cheers! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PROT[edit]

Hi HeatIsCool, I thought I'd just give a courtesy note about my undoing your recent edit at WP:PROT. See Special:Diff/699287690 and Wikipedia:Protection policy/Padlocks for what I mean. I believe the red lock is considered dated and not used anymore. Cheers, and happy editing — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 21:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrGedden[edit]

I've deleted this page. You have no business tagging userpages with confirmed sock puppet templates. Indeed, I wouldn't tag any userpage with any sock templates except possibly "expressed a concern". Please don't do it again.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks very much. HeatIsCool 19:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ampezzaner Railway thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help in creating the redirect.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 07:32, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 30 in West Virginia has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 30 in West Virginia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Imzadi 1979 → 22:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 82 in Mississippi has been accepted[edit]

U.S. Route 82 in Mississippi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Imzadi 1979 → 22:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC submission[edit]

Hi, I noticed that my AfC submission was not accepted [1]. A Badly Broken Code, Bad Time Zoo, and Parts of Speech (album) are produced by Lazerbeak, but they are not Lazerbeak's albums. As with Category:Curt Boettcher albums and Category:Albums produced by Curt Boettcher, Category:Albums by artist is one thing and Category:Albums by producer is another. I believe Category:Albums produced by Lazerbeak has to be created. It would be nice if you took a second look. Thanks. Regards, 153.202.224.53 (talk) 08:56, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@153.202.224.53: As I said before, the category already exists here! I simply added the requested pages into the category. HeatIsCool 12:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Lazerbeak albums is one thing and Category:Albums produced by Lazerbeak is another. As I said above, Category:Albums by artist and Category:Albums by producer are two different things. Won't you please explain the reason why you think A Badly Broken Code, Bad Time Zoo, and Parts of Speech (album) are Lazerbeak's albums? 153.206.204.129 (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Reynolds equation page[edit]

Dear HeatIsCool,

I am writing you regarding the decline of the edits performed recently on the Reynolds equation page. I added an external link, which contains the examples of Matlab code of both analytical and numerical solutions of this equation. In my understanding, people looking for Reynolds equation are highly likely to be interested in these type of source. The webpage which is linked to, does not require any registration to get the access and does not contain any advertisements. So in my opinion, this link complies with the wikipedia rules. Please, let me know, what is violated with this link.

Best regards, Aydar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tribonet (talk • contribs) 10:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects[edit]

Hi. Just a tip. If you put the speedy tag below the redirect code, the redirect still operates. It's best put at the top so the redirect action is stopped. (Anything above the redirect code does this.) Cheers. Peridon (talk) 09:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:UAA report[edit]

Hello, HeatIsCool. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Template:UAA report".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 20 in Idaho (March 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boomer Vial was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at U.S. Route 20#Idaho instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Route 20 in Idaho has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Route 20 in Idaho. Thanks! Imzadi 1979 → 21:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the creation of Draft:U.S. Route 20 in Idaho![edit]

Just wanted to congratulate you on its creation and acceptance as an article in the mainspace. I did indeed nominate the draft for deletion at a time and twinkle notified you as well. I however reverted my nomination immediately after making it as I had changed my mind/decided it too soon since the draft had just been declined (or something like that) however forgot to remove the deletion nomination notice that twinkle put on your talk page, I have now removed that for you.

Congrats and happy editing! TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice[edit]

User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:HeatIsCool/db-hoax-notice during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HeatIsCool&oldid=1179747475"