User talk:Heavydata

How do you know?[edit]

How do YOU know so much about Johnny Test? A lot of people watch the series and they know more about it than YOU ever will. Warmpuppy2 talk 12:02 pm, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Johnny Test episode lessons and problems[edit]

Johnny's Turbo Toy Force: caption glitch
Johnny Mint Chip: addiction
Phat Johnny: karma
The Enchanted Land of Johnnia: perserverance
101 Johnnies: responsibility
00-Johnny: trust
Johnny Bee Good: You never know until you try
JX5 Part II: teamwork and caring for the Earth

As you can quite clearly see, these have a right to be here. I don't know WHY you were deleting these and saying it was original research and vandalism because they're clearly pointed in the episodes. If they weren't, they wouldn't be here.

Please stop being dumb and leave the article alone. It's clear you have no idea what you're doing, so just stop bothering. Emmanuel A. Asiegbu (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Emmanuel A. Asiegbu (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because they ARE original research and cruft. You can say that Family Guy has life lessons, but people don't make lists of them on that episode's page. Heavydata (talk) 22:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even know what original research MEANS? These are clearly seen in the episodes, so leave me and the article alone. Emmanuel A. Asiegbu (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

General Note[edit]

Hey their, I saw your report on WP:AIV and took care of it, but I just wanted to stop by to tell you that users removing comments from their own talk page is allowed and is not reportable vandalism, and that includes vandalism warnings and block notices per Wikipedia:Talk#User_talk_pages. Thanks and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 23:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then, I thought it was only allowed if you removed your own comments, not other peoples. Thanks for letting me know, and giving him a time out. Heavydata (talk) 23:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger talks[edit]

There appears to be another discussion at the List of Johnny Test characters page stating that the list should be in the main article. Sarujo (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another List of Johnny Test characters dispute[edit]

Sigh... It seems that the user formally known as Warmpuppy might be up to their old tricks by adding bad sourcing for the character information as anonymous IP 99.19.92.173. As they get mad and threaten indefinite blocking whenever their edits are removed. What do you think? Sarujo (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PR[edit]

You do realize the idiocy behind and the extreme amount of work needed to move every single page on Power Rangers just because RangerBoard does not think that a colon belongs between "Power Rangers" and "Zeo", et al., right?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to be going up against every single Star Wars fan now. Have fun.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am free to edit my own comments in any discussion so long as it does not affect later comments in the discussion. I am also allowed to remove any comments from my own talk page as I see fit. In comparison, you are completely free to remove this entire section from your talk page as you see fit. However, you are not allowed to revert edits I make to my own comments on your talk page, as far as I am aware.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look up the term "colon" here on Wikipedia. One of the correct uses is "separation of a title and the corresponding subtitle" ie "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope." If you do a quick search for the word "subtitle" the first entry is "Subtitle (titling), an explanatory or alternate title of a book, play, film, musical work, etc., in addition to its main title" which details "Subtitles are also used to distinguish different installments in a series, instead of or in addition to a number" This applies to all the Power Rangers series that except for the original "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers", so the colon is the correct usage in all subsequent Power Rangers titles.70.177.84.41 (talk) 12:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP is either a sock puppet or a meat puppet. He makes the exact same points and talks the same way to. Pathetic. Heavydata (talk) 13:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The IP is not me.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 13:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing if two or more people agree on something they're automatically sock puppets? Derp.70.177.84.41 (talk) 14:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope you can agree. But you make the exact same points and talk the same way too. So, probably a meat puppet. Heavydata (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You said at Ryulong talk page "They're without colons on the official sites" but ABC Kids website says the show name with a colon. Powergate92Talk 22:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

powerrangers.com is not up to date as its list only gos up to Power Rangers: Jungle Fury, abckids.com is also not up to date (as it list Power Rangers: RPM when it should list Mighty Morphin Power Rangers) but it's more up to date then powerrangers.com. So as abckids.com is the only official Disney website to have Power Rangers: RPM on it, it's more reliable then bandai.com (as bandai.com is the website for the toys not the show). Powergate92Talk 22:43, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dude if it pisses you off that much then just email Bandai themselves on the matter and then post a screencap of their response email. Until then just drop it. 70.177.84.41 (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. jgp T C 10:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omg you posted on my talk page and I disagree with you! THAT AUTOMATICALLY MEANS YOU'RE VANDALISING IT AND STALKING ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </your logic>Heavydata (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remain Civil[edit]

When dealing with other editors here, please remember to remain civil, which you did not do at User talk:Super Chris Rock. Language like this can get you reported at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts or, more severely, the admins' noticeboard. If you are frustrated with another editor, calmly let them know about it, and if you start getting mad, consider taking a short break from editing, even for just an hour or so. Also keep in mind that there is a dispute resolution process. Robert Skyhawk ^{(T C B)} 00:08, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heavydata. You have new messages at Robert Skyhawk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Heavydata, I do understand how frustrating it can be - believe me. However, those edit comments ain't gonna help keep things cool. The edits were original research - they lacked references to reliable sources. But they weren't vandalism, they weren't shit.

Please assume good faith. In a situation like that, by all means remove the edits - but please, try to explain to the other use why you removed them. Otherwise, how will they learn what they did wrong?

If you work with the other editor...it's possible they might help you to fix up the article, and to keep the vandals away. OK, it doesn't always work; often, it leads to more frustration. But occasionally, it works, and when it does, it's great. So, please, stop calling other peoples efforts 'shit'.

After speaking to the editor, I'm convinced that they do want the same as you - to make the article better. They just do not, as yet, understand Wikipedia verifiability. I have tried to emphasize it to them. I see that, today, they're editing their user page instead; possible problems with WP:NOTMYSPACE, but still, preferable to adding unreferenced things to the article.

If you do have any further problems, let me know. I do agree with your warning notices. Chzz ► 14:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arguing with other users ain't going to get both of you nowhere. 68.185.247.219 (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super Chris Rock[edit]

Re. You cannot "close" your talk page without admin approval. You also cannot blank your page as well

Wrong, you can, to both. Any user can remove anything/everything from their own talk page; if they remove a warning or block message, that is fine, we assume they have read it.

It's perfectly permitted.

The page has been blanked now, so please don't edit it again, thanks. Chzz ► 21:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Read Help:Archive as well. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 08:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the page is closed, I suggest you leave it alone. Super Chris Rock (talk) 03:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Heavydata. You have new messages at Dabomb87's talk page.
Message added 03:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Seriously?[edit]

I'm the guy you recently sent a message to on the Johnny Test page. Who do you think you are, Supreme Ruler? You called me a kid and told me to get a life. YOU should be the one getting a life. You don't even know me, so how would you know if I am kid? And am I supposed to care if you didn't find what I wrote funny? I'm probably funnier than you'll ever be. If I wanted to get ranted on, I would have went to freakin GameFAQs. And the only reason I did what I did was to show my friend (who is just now using Wikipedia) that you can edit anything on the site. Grow up, and think about what you type before sending people messages. Pathetic.

P.S I don't care if you delete this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.0.63 (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message to me:

Whatever. I'm done with you. Don't bother me. I only use this website to search things anyways. And P.S., the only reason I argued with you was because you had the audacity to insult me. And you STILL did in your message. You obviously don't have respect for "dumb kids" (BTW, thanks for insulting my intelligence and giving false claims about my age), so I'm done editing. I don't want to have to deal with your crap again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.0.63 (talk) 21:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Heavydata. You have new messages at Endofskull's talk page.
Message added 20:51, 27 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

September 2010[edit]

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Endofskull (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette[edit]

Hello, Heavydata. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Endofskull (talk) 22:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you had to go through the archives of my talk page to find me using the F-word. You did, correctly, spot that I wrote "my talk page is a fuck-free zone." You may have missed that this was in response to an IP editor, who said, "I'm not fucking vandalizing anything." Now, I would propose that that's hardly the same as telling another editor, "Get a life kiddie, seriously." Have a good day. Drmies (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard.[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Also, it's not harassment, it's reporting you. Thank you. Endofskull (talk) 22:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message Alert[edit]

OK. I do want you to leave you alone. It's just that:

1. You left that comment on my talk page.
2. I'm 9
3. Just cos I'm young that doesn't mean you can leave a comment about me doing make-up edits.

Now do you get that? Owen the Kid (talk) 29 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owen the Kid (talk • contribs)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]