User talk:Hede2000

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 19:39, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Dunant[edit]

Hello. Did you write this article? What was wrong with the language on the Danish Wikipedia? Does the original also need to be transferred to another Wikipedia. Best, Tfine80 20:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Working Man's Barnstar[edit]

		An Award
		I, Kareeser hereby award you, Hede2000, the Working Man's Barnstar for your tireless contributions to the English Wikipedia by adding interwiki links to the Danish Wikipedia! Interconnectivity is one often overlooked goal, but it is still fully appreciated! Kareeser 21:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome =) Everybody needs recognition... Kareeser|^Talk! 01:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit counter[edit]

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms

--

da:Canterbury Scene[edit]

I just looked at the article and noticed that the "Bands og musikere" section has improper links, since many of them have simply been copied from the en article. E.g. there was a link da:Camel (band) which does not exist. da:Camel exists and is the article about the band, tho (I fixed that one). On the other hand, the Camel article, da:Soft Machine and da:Robert Wyatt do not have links to da:Canterbury Scene, they simply don't mention it. I hardly know any Danish (have a vague plan to learn it, tho), not even what "See also" would be in Danish. Maybe you'd like to fix some of those flaws or can add to the respective talk pages... Regards, --BNutzer 21:26, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NLP[edit]

Sorry about that. I didn't realize it was in Danish, so it just seemed like Total nonsense. Thanks for letting me know. I have changed it back.--Werdan7^{T @} 19:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uli Jon Roth[edit]

I propose retention of neo-classical contributor statement in first paragraph, which you had deleted. It's now more NPOV. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lexein (talk • contribs) 21:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Languages[edit]

Wow dude... that's an impressive list of language userboxes you've got there. I admire your multilinguism... I really really wish I was like that. :-) --NetherlandishYankee 01:40, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Matthew O'Callaghan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Matthew O'Callaghan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 21:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hej![edit]

Jeg kan se at du er aktiv på den engelske Wikipedia, og at du er fra Danmark. I skrivende stund, diskuterer vi på landsbybrønden et nyt forslag, om at starte en national afdeling, der vil blive kaldet Wikimedia Danmark. Hvis du er interesseret i at bidrage med noget tid til at få startet afdelingen, kan du skrive dit navn på denne side hos meta. Tak for din tid! Mike H. Fierce! 06:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons. Thanks. Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]