User talk:Heisycat
April 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Red Hot Chili Peppers do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Red Hot Chili Peppers. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dekisugi (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Red Hot Chili Peppers. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tooga - BØRK! 13:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Why is it that you will allow a last.fm link and not a audiotube link when our pages are less of a spamfarm that last.fm's page is? audiotube is a resource and we dont aprreciate you treating us like the crap spammers that flood most of wikipedias pages. we also do not violoate the wikipedia terms of use.
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Audiotube, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://emediawire.com/releases/2008/2/prweb684954.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Audiotube requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Duffy (singer), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. Dekisugi (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Heisycat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i am not a spammer and am being trated as one by wikipedia editors who are putting up spam links to large corporate sites instead of real links as they should be doing
Decline reason:
"Spamming" here means putting links to the same website in a number of articles, or repeatedly into a few, regardless of the commercial or noncommercial nature of the site. There are other places to promote yourself. Please also see our external links policy ... just any won't suffice. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.