User talk:Hempfel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Minor Harry Potter beasts[edit]

Ihave reverted your last change to Minor Harry Potter beasts. I have done this because the page is specificly for creatures and/or specific varities of creatures (eg. Hungarian Horntails) that were created by J.K. Rowling. Other creatures that are mentioned in Harry potter that are (eg gryffins, manticores,unicorns, etc...) should be covered on the respective wikipedia pages. Kevmin 01:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal questions[edit]

Additions to the portal need to be discussed before being added. If we were to add "question of the day" sections, they would need to be consistent with the format of the rest of the portal, in any case.--ragesoss 17:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Wikicalendar pages[edit]

Hey Hempfel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your recent edits to the Wikicalendar pages. I noticed that some of your recent birth/death entries are in the form of complete sentences - that's not necessary, since the title implies that everyone under the heading was born/died on that date. Instead, all the info you need to put there is the person's name, nationality, and one or two-word description of the person's most important occupation or role. Let me know if you have any questions on my talk page. Thanks :). Fabricationary 03:46, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage edits[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. This is for just adding random spam to a sockpuppet main user page. And a friendly reminder to clean up your text since it is stretching my browser ATM. Thanks in advance. Logical2u 21:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Self-references[edit]

Please don't add self-referential material to articles. See Wikipedia:Avoid self-references for more information. --Slowking Man 07:11, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Looking though your edits I see alot of nonsense, and false info, as well as slick vandalism, blocked indef. Jaranda wat's sup 05:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw some ok edits as well, but is mostly nonsense, I reduced the block to 24 hours. And if you add nonsense or vandalise an article one more time, indef. Jaranda wat's sup 06:04, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]



I never blocked you. DS 18:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock}

To my sincere User:Pilotguy,{unblock}. Thanks!

{unblock}

Please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hempfel (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

I have nominated your most recent article Aha Variable for deletion as a likely hoax. Given your history of nonsense and misleading edits to articles and the fact you've been blocked for that, I would have hoped you would have stopped making stuff up on Wikipedia. If you wish to comment in the AfD debate you may. Thanks, Gwernol 22:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google returns: zero results for "aha variable algebra". The best you can do is a few results for "aha calculus" which: 1) is not what your article is about, and 2) is at the least a controversial opinion, not established fact. Gwernol 22:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, Google returns [1]. Only the first two results are anything to do with what you claim in your article. The rest are unrelated. The two results that relate have already been discussed and are at best dubious. Please read reliable sources and verifiability. Thanks, Gwernol 23:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just to jump in here, as you left a comment on my talk page about this, I looked over the article and agree with its proposed deletion. I take your word that this article is not a hoax, but even as a true article, it doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia's notability standards. I have discussed this a bit more on the AfD page. Your asking me to delete the deletion box from the page demonstrates what I think is a misunderstanding on your part of our deletion policy. When an article is nominated for AfD, the first user who disagrees for whatever reason doesn't go delete the box (in fact, removing them is considered vandalism). If a user disagrees with the deletion, he or she can voice his or her opinions at the AfD page, but AfD is NOT a matter of "counting heads," and the ultimate deletion/keep/merging/other action done to the page is judged by the validity of the points given with respect to Wikipedia's policies. Going around a bunch of user's talk pages trying to solicit votes isn't the way to save a page. Fabricationary 23:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Test[edit]

Helpfe!


khjkgkjgkj[edit]

  [[UserTalk:Hempfel/Helpfe!

Hello! You accidentally created this page in the article space, which is strange as this message is being left on an already-established page. I have deleted it. (aeropagitica) 23:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Nonsense edit summaries[edit]

Please stop using nonsense edit summaries such as uiukuiui. These are unhelpful. Please consider using edit summaries that actually summarize your edits. Thanks, Gwernol 21:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Last warning[edit]

Please stop using Wikipedia as a place to post nonsense. In particular, making Templates/userboxes like "Template:This user likes little boys" is really bad taste and completely unacceptable. Consider this your last warning. Shanes 23:27, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

block[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 205.188.116.130 lifted. Sorry for the trouble!

Request handled by: Luna Santin 23:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

block ll[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 152.163.101.12 lifted.

Request handled by: Luna Santin 00:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'SUP,HEMPFEL?! [edit]

User:Jomon & Jerrison

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 63.215.27.149 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Миша13 22:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Peru[edit]

Hi, you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru, we help expand Peru-related articles and take care of the Portal:Peru. Talk there, thanks. -- Walter Humala Godsave him! (wanna Talk?) 15:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia WikiProject[edit]

Please check out the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Georgia_.28country.29 Chris 03:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you created an article about HD188753b. There is already an article about this exoplanet at HD 188753 Ab and would welcome your contributions to expand and improve the article. I nominated HD188753b for deletion as it is redundant and contains less information than the existing article.--mikeu 15:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hempfel. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Aliensoflondon.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Hempfel. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:06, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AWARD!!!!!!!![edit]

The Excellent Userpage Award
I award you this barnstar for putting extra effort on your user page ISOLA'd ELBA 21:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hempfel, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Parser bird ptic.png) was found at the following location: User:Hempfel. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hempfel, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Slitheen.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Hempfel. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images on your userpage[edit]

Hi, I cleaned up some of the bigger images located on your userpage so that they look better. You might want to learn more about the Wikipedia:Extended image syntax. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox abuse[edit]

You really ought to remove some of your userboxes; I could remove them myself, but I think that would be in poor form. While you might think it is cool to collect as many as you want, it really clutters up the page and detracts from the content of your page. I'm not sure how they display on a larger monitor, but for those of us on 1024x768 laptop screens it really marginalizes the text.

Furthermore, the inclusion of many of your userboxes is simply inappropriate because you do not truly belong to all of the groups you claim to. For example, you cannot be celtic, norse, british, AND ethnically chinese, etc all at the same time. People use the userbox category pages to find other users with the same interests, preferences, and activities.

I got to your page by clicking on the MIT userbox on my userpage with the intent of seeing what kinds of other people from MIT are writing for wikipedia these days. Having a userbox of someone who attends or has attended MIT on your profile is simply misleading. You should remove this userbox from your profile immediately.

If you want to make userboxes that are similar but accurately represent yourself with messages like "I am interested in (insert country/culture)" or "I want to attend (insert college/university)" that would be a useful addition to the wiki community. Details on how to code your own userboxes can be found here: Userboxes.

Please help keep wikipedia professional and accurate by correcting your page.

--Jhamon 03:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

its me nick ryan[edit]

i just kame and i wanted to say can u gimme a cracker please 10/3/2007. its me ryan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.137.254 (talk) 21:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Aída Balta[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aída Balta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lilac Soul (talk contribs count) 22:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging José Villa Soberón for further review

Hello, Hempfel … I recently encountered the article about José Villa Soberón and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I am considering tagging José Villa Soberón (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for deletion according to the Deletion policy … I do not have time to examine the article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now, and I am always available to help you become a more proactive contributor. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 03:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup[edit]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 14:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grupo Néctar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to comply with policies WP:N, WP: BIO, WP: MUSIC, this is not an article of suitable content for the encyclopedia.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D6h What's on your mind? 12:48, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daisy Valls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delsion23 (talk) 00:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Bolaños[edit]

The article Frank Bolaños has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]