User talk:Henry W. Schmitt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You are further proof that children should not be allowed on Wikipedia.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Henry W. Schmitt/Archive_02. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Archivo primero

Re: Coordinates of Line Islands[edit]

I got this point from this NGA data set: http://gnswww.nga.mil/geonames/GNS/index.jsp Feel free to tweak + make it better though. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldfishbutt (talkcontribs) 23:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First inhabitants of Kiribati[edit]

I've got Cinderellas of the Empire open in front of me, and on page 1 Macdonald writes that the future Gilbertese "reached the Gilberts perhaps some 4000 or 5000 years ago". However, the book is comparatively "old" (1982), so the hypothesis may be outdated. Interestingly, the government of Kiribati (on the website I linked to) seems to think there was no-one there prior to 1000 AD or later, which seems equally implausible. By contrast, Moarerei Kirion and Bureieta Karaiti, in a chapter of Kiribati: Aspects of History (p.11), write: "There is a growing amount of evidence to prove [...] that the Gilbert Islands have been inhabited for at least 3,000 years, and that the ancient origin of the migrants was Southeast Asia". That time scale would seem to fit with estimated times of discovery of other island groups. If you'd like to remove the hypotheses of Macdonald and of the I-Kiribati government, and reference Aspects of History (or any other source suggesting circa 1000 BC) instead, feel free. It would indeed seem more plausible. Aridd (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Paperback, reprint of 1998 (first printed in 1979). It's a collaborative work by 25 I-Kiribati authors, with a very brief foreword by Ieremia Tabai. Have you got any other published histories of Kiribati? I'm not aware of very many. Aridd (talk) 22:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a wonderful idea. I wish you the best of luck with it! (And thank you for the link to Tungaru Traditions.) Aridd (talk) 23:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Henry W. Schmitt! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 17:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Howland Island Locator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As Wikipedia has grown, thousands and thousands of templates have been created. It simply isn't necessary to keep them around. If they are no longer used and no longer needed, they can be deleted. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw your post. I responded. You didn't like my response. What, exactly, do you want from me? I'm not having a protracted debate about the merits of template deletion; I've done it too many times, and I frankly don't have the energy to do it again. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking point (psychology) - proposed deletion[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Breaking point (psychology), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Breaking point (psychology). KathrynLybarger (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Breaking point (psychology), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave it as a small "q". You're right, normally proper nouns use capital letters, but if that is how NBC types it, then that is how it should be. It is in the same fashion as the small "i" for i wireless Ctjf83talk 06:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So are we discussing if it should be a capital or lowercase "q" or were you just informing me of other incidences? Ctjf83talk 07:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I disagree with that MOS, and think it should go by how NBC writes it. Never-the-less, it's also not something I'm going to strongly defend, or even worry about now, so if you want to change it back, you can, and I will leave it Ctjf83Talk 17:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, well apparently the show was crap, cause it is already canceled, so I don't care what happens on the page now! Ctjf83Talk 19:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pge.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Pge.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Flag of Sacramento CA.svg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Hi Henry W. Schmitt!
We thank you for uploading Image:Flag of Sacramento CA.svg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Rogers Clark Flag[edit]

I updated the text on the George Rogers Clark Flag image to give you credit for your rewrite. Have a great day. -DevinCook (talk) 11:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fir0002 photos[edit]

Category:Fir0002 photos, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. VegaDark (talk) 06:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Favicon-in-firefox102.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Favicon-in-firefox102.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malden Island Photo Inverted[edit]

The astronaut photo of Malden Island that you uploaded is inverted with respect to conventional map orientation (i.e., north is at the bottom). Can you correct this? 71.231.47.146 (talk) 17:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Scion svg.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Scion svg.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 09:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag width[edit]

Back in January you commented on Template talk:Infobox Country about the missing flag_width parameter. I ran into the same problem as you did, and hacked the template to reinstate the parameter. I've asked on the template's talk page that my modification be applied to the template, so hopefully it'll be in place soon. In the meantime, you can view the modified template at User:This flag once was red/sandbox2 - it shows two flags side-by-side, with the width for each specified (using flag_width and symbol_width).

Cheers,  This flag once was red  00:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Danger Man episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Danger Man episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Danger Man episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Jah wont pay the bills.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jah wont pay the bills.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:University of the South Pacific.svg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:University of the South Pacific.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Honda.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Honda.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox outlying island[edit]

Template:Infobox outlying island has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jarvis Island Locator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 02:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Howland Island Locator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 02:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Navassa Island Locator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 02:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Costco Wholesale.svg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Costco Wholesale.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Beeblebrox (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kiribati-islands/no has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allstate svg1.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allstate svg1.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hertz svg.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hertz svg.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indolence.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indolence.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Opie Ortiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 00:45, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Names for soft drinks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as OR for four years. Almost completely unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cresix (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:AT&T logo.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AT&T logo.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:53, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Old Sealand Generator.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Old Sealand Generator.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsinkable listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Unsinkable. Since you had some involvement with the Unsinkable redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ansh666 04:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Sacramento Regional Transit.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Sacramento Regional Transit.svg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:United Airlines logo (1973 - 2010).svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Airlines logo (1973 - 2010).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sagecandor (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sanjay zz.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal photo, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well to do listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Well to do. Since you had some involvement with the Well to do redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AT&T logo.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AT&T logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Henry W. Schmitt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Kiribati[edit]

Portal:Kiribati, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kiribati and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kiribati during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Harley-Davidson.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harley-Davidson.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Danske Forsvars logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danske Forsvars logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wamu.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wamu.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 11:29, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Favicon-in-Firefox.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused Wikipedia-specific screenshot

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Favicon-inFirefox.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused Wikipedia-specific screenshot

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kiribati-islands/top[edit]

Template:Kiribati-islands/top has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:NAMECHANGE" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:NAMECHANGE and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 30#Wikipedia:NAMECHANGE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 10:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect I-Kiribati and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 11 § Ikiribati until a consensus is reached. —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 00:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]