User talk:Hewittj

October 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Frank Gorenc was changed by Hewittj (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928364 on 2012-10-24T12:02:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Gorenc, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Klilidiplomus+Talk 12:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Frank Gorenc, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli ^Talk 13:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Frank Gorenc

Hi... I reverted your blanking of the Frank Gorenc page. While I appreciate that you left an edit summary giving your reasons for blanking the page, it is still inappropriate to remove an entire article on the basis of 'inaccuracies' that you suggest. Additionally, removing it at the behest of the article's subject is generally regarded as a conflict of interest.

I would encourage you to identify those parts of the article that are not accurate and correct them (from a neutral point of view and include verifiable third-party sources for the information. If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to let me know! Wikipelli ^Talk 13:50, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

to be more specific, it would be useful if rather than saying "this article is inaccurate," you would instead state what specific parts are inaccurate, and point to sources that give correct information. Also, you might want to discuss this on the talk page. NumberC35 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)