User talk:Historian Jatt

May 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC) I had no such intentions, but I am sure my views reflected public opinion. Some people might have had objections, but my intentions did not include hurting people's belief. Anyhow, Thank you. I will be sure to remember this from now on. Historian Jatt (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Historian Jatt.[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rupan Bal, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SK2242 (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fateh Singh Ahluwalia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fateh Singh Ahluwalia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nameisthor (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fateh Singh Ahluwalia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fateh Singh Ahluwalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fateh Singh Ahluwalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 02:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Satth moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Satth. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh Okay thank you! Historian Jatt (talk) 14:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh But also, can you help me with this? Thing is, the object of the draft is something that exists only at a grassroot level and hasn't been documented as such by any other sources. There exist only images relevant to it, no written data or sources to verify it. So does that mean this draft will be put for speedy deletion? Historian Jatt (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your article can remain in draft space for up to 6 months without being edited. Edits to the article will reset the clock, essentially allowing the draft to be kept indefinitely. If you cannot find any sources for the article then unfortunately it shouldn't be created. Article must not contain original research and the information presented must be verifiable. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh Okay thank you very much Historian Jatt (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Satth[edit]

Hello, Historian Jatt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Satth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]