User talk:Historianbuff
Welcome Historianbuff!
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Sincerely, Arctic Kangaroo 02:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Arctic Kangaroo 02:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Historianbuff. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Historianbuff. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Historianbuff. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Files and provenance[edit]
See Reply and my comments given on Wiki Commons file deletion page. Historianbuff (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Could you have a look at this, please? We might need information that you have. DS (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Corvette C1 Revision[edit]
Hi Historianbuff - can you walk me through the logic in reverting recent changes to Corvette C1, which as I recall needed references for some of it's points. One of the glaring errors that I fixed was reference to the 1955 Ford Thunderbird as a 'personal luxury car' - the marketing department of Ford Motor Company described it as 'a personal car of distinction' to establish the T-Bird as different from the C1 'sports car.' The press in late 1954 adopted this name. Then in 1958, the Ford marketing department called the four seat model a 'personal luxury car.' This is the first reference I can find that uses this term. If you do have references to the contrary, please share them. Thanks for being a conscientious editor. PLawrence99cx (talk) 23:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello PLawrence99cx - I reverted your changes due to the fact that I believe you had used a not a reliable WP:UNRELIABLE and also a questionable WP:QUESTIONABLE reference source. If you disagree, then you could always go to the main talk page and discuss it further. Historianbuff (talk) 12:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Germans made the first working Transistor[edit]
The world's first working device was built in Paris by German scientists Herbert Mataré and Heinrich Welker , who preceded the Bell Labs, Moreover their prototype was more advanced than the prototype of Bell Labs. See: https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-history/silicon-revolution/how-europe-missed-the-transistor Just because the War Crimes of Germans , it was impossible to receive Global attention for Germans after the war.--Regtraht (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
"he French device “turns out...to be superior to its American counterpart,” read a more measured but still favorable account in Toute la Radio, a technical journal [see drawing and photo]. “The latter has a limited lifetime and appears to be fairly unstable, whereas the existing transistrons do not show any sign of fatigue.”
According to Mataré, this superiority could be attributed to the care they employed in fabricating their devices. While observing the process with microscopes, the women working on the small assembly line would measure current-voltage curves for both metal points with oscilloscopes and fix the points rigidly on the germanium with drops of epoxy after the curves matched the desired characteristics. When Brattain and Shockley visited the Paris group in 1950, Mataré showed them telephone amplifiers made with his transistrons—which allowed him to place a call all the way to Algiers. “That’s quite something,” admitted Shockley a bit guardedly, Mataré recalls half a century later."
No wonder, since the United states was not center of the scientific discoveries, it is enough to compare the number most famous scientific awards, the American results were simply laughable in a comparison with Germany or UK.--Regtraht (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
NO where does it say in the article reference that you had added, which says Matare or Welker had discovered the Transistor BEFORE the Bell Lab scientists. If you are correct, then why did the three scientists of Bell Labs had been awarded the Nobel Prize (Stockholm Sweden) in Physics (1956), for their Transistor Invention and not Matare or Welker ? Historianbuff (talk) 02:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Nobel prize is not an official document like patents, neither a proof for the past, like a publication in a scientific magazine/newspaper. If you read the article, both Matare or Welker dealt with the subject a decade before Bell Labs.--Regtraht (talk) 14:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
You are Wrong. Matare and Welker had originally worked on duodiodes and rectifiers during WW2,as also stated in your reference article. Also, authors and writers often do make mistakes in their magazine/newspaper applications and that is why the original patent filing dates are the only proof of having an invention, not their own research scientific papers that easily can be changed later on. Finally, Matare had filed his original transistor patent (Transitron) on August 13th 1948, "AFTER" Bell Labs had filed their original transistor patent. Furthermore, I have nothing more to add to this subject and if you still have a problem, I would suggest that you take it up with its "Main" transistor talk page. Historianbuff (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, according to External links to avoid item # 11, it would appear that the site you are wanting to add back in falls within "personal website" or fan page. Is the author of that website a recognized expert, not by the swearing of other enthusiasts, but have reliably published books (not "self publishing" vanity presses) on the topic of antique radios? Graywalls (talk) 17:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello Graywalls,
You are not correct with you information that you have stated. This website link that was originally listed, not by me, is a website that provides all sorts of various repair materials, schematics, and parts listings for various antique radios and were published by the "original" radio manufacturers. The website and its owners does NOT repair any radios and this is also stated on his website. I suggest that you go to the website and see what "valuable resource information" that is provided from the various early radio manufacturers. Historianbuff (talk) 17:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- That would be fandom site, a personal site being, a website built by an individual for fans, or how to guides. Graywalls (talk) 19:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to remove this external link that has valuable antique radio reference information, then you need to go it the main TALK page and start a Consensus and get of majority of editor users that agrees with you, in order to remove this existing material. Remember, Wikipedia is NOT a one band show, and just because you say so, that does not mean that you are correct. I suggest that maybe instead of just removing existing referenced materials, like you have been doing with your previous edits, maybe you should add some useful referenced materials that will further enhance the subject materials. Historianbuff (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
"own image"[edit]
Hello, I see the image that you uploaded https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antique_radio#/media/File:Transistor_car_radio_Mopar_model_914HR.JPG is used in the article also appears in the cited source http://www.allpar.com/stereo/Philco/index.html . The article's author is also the same as the contributor of the image. I am wondering what's going on here. Graywalls (talk) 14:43, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I have corrected the existing information on the Wikimedia commons image page. Thanks --Historianbuff (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Whose image is it, and where does it say the actual author has released the image, NOT for use on Wikipedia, but released it under Creative Commons license? If this person is someone you personally know, and you're using the article they have written, that needs to be disclosed as well for NPOV/COI reasons. Graywalls (talk) 21:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |