User talk:History6042

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, History6042, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Eric Danon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eric Danon[edit]

Notice

The article Eric Danon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

added my sources sorry forgot History6042 (talk) 02:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hélène Le Gal[edit]

Hi. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. You have a lot of numbered sources at the bottom, but they aren't linked to any of the points in the article, and I can't guess where they might fit best. Did they come from something else?

The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is still under construction (if it is). This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 11:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hélène Le Gal moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Hélène Le Gal. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 17:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hélène Le Gal (March 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, History6042! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 22:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Molly Weasley into Draft:Molly Weasley. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material from Fandom also requires attribution. — Diannaa (talk) 11:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok but how do i atrributte History6042 (talk) 11:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already did so, by adding the required edit summary for the material copied from Wikipedia, and added a note at the bottom of the draft for the Fandom content. — Diannaa (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks History6042 (talk) 21:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molly Weasley (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 22:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hélène Le Gal has been accepted[edit]

Hélène Le Gal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:46, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of ambassadors of France to Denmark moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of ambassadors of France to Denmark, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red[edit]

Hi there, History6042, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to create more biographies of women diplomats. On the basis of Hélène Le Gal, it looks as if you will be a useful member. You might find it useful to look at some of our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023[edit]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 07:42, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Asis (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of Im Yunjidang[edit]

Hello, I'm letting you know that I've reverted your nomination of Im Yunjidang as a good article. It's usually expected that articles are nominated by one of the main contributors to the article, because it's important that the nominator is familiar with the article's subject and the sources being used. Please feel free to nominate more articles in the future, but make sure they're ones where you're the main contributor. Questions about the good article process can be asked at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi History6042, similar to the above, I have removed the GAN from Isamu Imoto. While the rules note there is latitude around what can be a GAN, this latitude is not as large as the wording might suggest it is, and a stub is not close to sufficient for a GA. Concerns were also raised about Talk:Maurice Duplessis/GA1, which does not show what was reviewed and how. Wikipedia processes are often somewhat inscrutable, so it's giving a bit of time to familiarise yourself with them. Best, CMD (talk) 03:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Islands of Insight[edit]

Notice

The article Islands of Insight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N and WP:NOTCRYSTAL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am aware of this but i have the page ready for when it is released + it is notable it is a game a the pc gaming show and published by a major game compony History6042 (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Angelos Almouti[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Angelos Almouti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ASUKITE 17:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Islands of Insight for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islands of Insight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islands of Insight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:18, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red July 2023[edit]

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Maisonnave[edit]

Notice

The article Patrick Maisonnave has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am going to work on it more i just stopped for ther day im in eastern time History6042 (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary[edit]

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red August 2023[edit]

Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Maisonnave[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references, as you did to Patrick Maisonnave! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:04, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lateral with Tom Scott for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lateral with Tom Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lateral with Tom Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 22:28, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth II RM[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Come on! The previous RM was two weeks old and got snow closed after less than ten people supported it amongst an ocean of participants. At least wait a couple months next time 😜. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 18:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok History6042 (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you're a newer editor (welcome!) so I just wanna make clear this is a silly thing and not a serious admonishment or anything like that. In the future, it's generally good to have some evidence that the consensus is likely to have changed before reopening a topic (and almost never a good idea to do it 10 days after the last discussion). Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 20:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. History6042 (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil Chhetri[edit]

I have noticed you have done some good work at the article. However, before your edits lot of disruptive edits along with vandalism done by some some users, for which I've restored to a previous best version. However, with this revert, your edit was also reverted. I will ask you if you kindly can make the correction again, it will great for the article. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 08:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023 at Women in Red[edit]

Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Vanessa Brown (author) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Vanessa Brown (author). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green GA Editathon October 2023 - Around the World in 31 Days[edit]

Hello History6042:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

Women in Red October 2023[edit]

Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Madeleine Kogevinas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madeleine Kogevinas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Political career of Rab Butler (1941–1951) has been accepted[edit]

Political career of Rab Butler (1941–1951), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

microbiologyMarcus (petri dish) 13:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of ambassadors of France to Denmark[edit]

Information icon Hello, History6042. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of ambassadors of France to Denmark, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of ambassadors of France to Denmark (October 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2023[edit]

Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tupou VI[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tupou VI you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 02:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tupou VI[edit]

The article Tupou VI you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tupou VI for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 14:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huang Renjie for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huang Renjie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huang Renjie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tls9-me (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathy Bunka for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathy Bunka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Bunka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tls9-me (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alberte Bekkhus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alberte Bekkhus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberte Bekkhus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tls9-me (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2023[edit]

Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Molly Weasley[edit]

Information icon Hello, History6042. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Molly Weasley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amro El Jawich for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amro El Jawich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amro El Jawich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

dxneo (talk) 15:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2024[edit]

Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

GA review of Arithmetic[edit]

Hello History6042 and thanks for taking the time to review the article Arithmetic. In its current form, the review states that the article passes the review but it does not explain how you came to that conclusion. This might make it difficult for other editors to understand why the article fulfills these criteria. It would be helpful if you could add a short text to describe how each criterion was checked since the GA instructions require that An in-depth review must be provided (see WP:GAN/I#R3).

For example, in regard to the first criterion, you could explain in what sense it is "reasonably well written" by describing how your reading experience of the different sections was in terms of style, grammar, and understandability. In regard to the sources, it would be good to add a short spot-check by writing down a few sentences from the article and assessing whether the references given in the article actually support them. Many of the sources used are available online. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:08, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. History6042 (talk) 16:25, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The review has been found to be invalid. Please review this thread for an explanation. You misunderstood the notice at the reward board—it was for nominators of level-2 vital articles. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sorry that I misunderstood. History6042 (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada[edit]

Information icon Hello, History6042. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tupou VI[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tupou VI you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Begocc -- Begocc (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red February 2024[edit]

Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, History6042. Thank you for your work on 2024 Saskatchewan Rush season. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

IMO should be merged/redirected into the team article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vanessa Brown (author)[edit]

Information icon Hello, History6042. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vanessa Brown (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada[edit]

Hello, History6042. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of ambassadors of Armenia to Canada".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on GA[edit]

Could you start a GA discussion regarding Haile Selassie I? Its odd the page has thousands of views a day yet for over a month no discussion regarding it started? Its a simple request so the process goes on faster CtasACT (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2024[edit]

Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vanessa Brown (author)[edit]

Hello, History6042. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vanessa Brown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tupou VI[edit]

The article Tupou VI you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tupou VI for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Begocc -- Begocc (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024[edit]

Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Non-free images[edit]

Hello. I noticed you added images to several Austrian and Singaporean election articles. However the articles in question are not free images, and are only on Wikipedia under conditions that they are limited to use in certain articles. For example, you can see on the Friedrich Peter image that it has a "Media data and Non-free use rationale" which limits its use to the Friedrich Peter article. Cheers, Number 57 21:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sorry. I just thought that because it was on the article for the person it was usable. Again, sorry. Bye. History6042 (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map of English football clubs by league[edit]

Template:Map of English football clubs by league has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Module:Map of English football clubs by league[edit]

Module:Map of English football clubs by league has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024[edit]

Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:History6042&oldid=1221155463"