User talk:Hmirfansadiq
Ahmadi claim on Mr. Sindhi[edit]
The aspect of Maulana Sindhis life with regards to Ahmadiyya movement has been "swept under the carpet" by the history writers. There are references in Ahmadiyya Literature to him visiting Qadian for discussions with Maulana Noorud Deen. On his demise, Mirza Basheerud Deen sahib spoke about his good qualities and mentioned his link with Ahmadiyya.
There is an article on his life and works in alfazal international, 06-12 Oct, 2006, Pages 13-14. http://www.alislam.org/alfazl/london/20061006.pdf
Regards,
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Khokhar976 (talk • contribs)
Alfazal is a Qadiani magazine and alislam.org is a Qadiani website. You can not publish things and call it a fact. For a valid claim, you need credible neutral sources. Mr. Sindhi was a violent resister of British Rule whereas Mr. Mirza was considered a British tout for his all out support for British Rule. So much so that people like former Pakistani Dictator General Zia ul Haq had to get a letter of recommendation from mr. Mirza to get a job in British Army. This paper is still in record in services file of Indian Army and was used by General's opponents. For this reason, initially most of the top brass of Pakistan was either real Qadiani or a declared Qadiani.
ps. show some guts and sign your note
Hassanfarooqi 16:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)