User talk:Hoffbrandm

Reply[edit]

You asked, "i dont understand why my comment was removed".

The answer is simple, and twofold.

Your sentence, inserted in the lead section, implies opposition to the doctrine. Since the article exists to describe the doctrine, such a statement does not belong, especially in the lead section.
Your use of the term G_D (instead of GOD) betrays your intentions. In any case, such a substitution is utterly inadequate for an encyclopedia.

--Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:16, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, Wikipedia is not the place to argue either for or against a certain concept. The article Trinity already has a section on nontrinitarianism. If you can show a significant Christian group that rejects the trinity on the grounds you exposed, then it is in that section that you must add a word to the effect that this or that group rejects the Trinity, and why. Said group must be significant enough, and your statement must be well-documented.

Furthermore, if you say, "this is an argument against the doctrine," your entry will be summarily reverted. You must say it more like, "this group opposes the doctrine for this reason," and you must not elaborate. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 18:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]