This user interacts with Wikipedia using outdated equipment and at sometimes their output may appear strange. Please try to assume good faith, this user only wishes to help build the encyclopedia. If you have any questions or concerns, please see my talk. –xeno (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Hopiakuta. You have new messages at Persina's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
While I'm sure our readers would find that information useful, many editors feel the encyclopedia should avoid self-referencing itself whenever possible. –xenotalk 03:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It did take me several weeks to find that, which is usability,....
Okay, so they want to make it virtually imposssible to locate,....;
So, if I would perceive the most important subproject to be fake, then there is no reason to think that wikimedia is anything more than a wikimirage, in a desert valley, excess heat, excess cold, yea, a mirage_(disambiguation), that's what it is,....
I read your comment with interest, and although I agree that it both serves no purpose - and adds an unnecessary level of "fame" - under the community policy the victim in this case has been publicly identified beyond any hope of reclaiming her anonymity.
That she felt forced to publicly address the issue due to excruciating pressure from outside sources who named her is of little relevance. Current policy simply recognizes the de facto situation as verifiable, supported and notable. (Although I would strongly quibble with the specific notability attached to knowing this victims name.
What would be your thoughts on a community policy that simply banned the publishing of the names of minors who were a victim of a crime - outright? It's a responsible policy found throughout the world and in many countries enshrined in law. That we would link to supporting ref's that possibly/likely contained the names is not relevant. It would be our policy simply that the names of minors as victims was de facto not notable.
Who moved xeno's comment? I do have copy & paste capability; xeno does have copy & paste capability. It should be one of two persons who decide when to move that.
I do not know whether even one page mentions what I am getting at.
I am searching f/ the correct adjective.
She does not retain her own identity, nor her own perspective; I do wonder whether her mention is inspired by an actual person. I do wonder that a ...... lot.
I do contend that, where feasible, where substantiated, an indicated person should be afforded an individual article; the alternative is that they, as I've said, have "...even less dignity in being listed in random comment pages,..."
My signature has always included my screenname; since @ least March it has advocated that people would sign. I had, previously, attempted other methods.
Since April it has stated my actual name, as my original userpage had. Individual identity is very imperative to me. A lot.
I'm not sure why the IP user restored my explanation, but you can remove it if you want. It was not me. The individual edit notes is an WP:Editnotice, you can make one by editing this page: User talk:Hopiakuta/Editnotice. –xenotalk 12:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:RFAR page is probably too lengthy for your browser. You could compile your thoughts in User:Hopiakuta/sandbox and then I could forward them, but I don't think the Arbitration Committee is the right body to look at them.
I am going to paste this list on my page, so that I can spend several hours on it, hopefully avoiding some of that annoying edit conflict; there, I shall expand my comments.
If you & I miscommunicate, &, if I inadvertently insult you, please do ask me to clarify my intent. Also, you might ask whether my mood or opinion have evolved.
I do suspect that this would work f/ virtually any page; however, I do figure that I should limit it to pages that are largely about me, or to places where consensus_(disambiguation) is that it is acceptable.
@ least once a week I would want an administrator to review whether I believe that it is resolved, possibly more often during an edit war.
Complaints about me should be revived, & moved to there, & negotiated.
If you intersperse your comments into mine, that can cause my brain to freeze, as well as to overheat; not good: my brain does get easily confused w/ that.
My actual brain, the one connected to my nose.
* * * My very first original edit has never satisfactorily been dealt with.
Yes, my error, not Xeno. I was not sure there if the tag was for talk or user page. No matter, it looks like you and X have sussed[2] it out. I'm not sure that a dedicated page, like say Elizabeth Smart, is called for yet. Personally I don't think I would support it as notable - especially as she (Polanski's victim) has already indicated her discomfort (Yet, on the flip side she is publicly discussing it on camera).
The only thing we know for certain is that we are in for another burst of notable activity on the subject when either the release or extradition occur.
Oh, and I will agree completely - the biggest suck on Wkipedia is an edit conflict. I thought it just sucked for non-members, but apparently members have no better tools to deal with it either. I just go back on my browser, cut my edit - and then reclick the section and paste. Do you have a better way?99.142.1.147 (talk) 02:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you intersperse your comments into mine, that can cause my brain to freeze, as well as to overheat; not good: my brain does get easily confused w/ that.
My actual brain, the one connected to my nose.
* * * My very first original edit has never satisfactorily been dealt with.
That page had been created by others to complain about me. I did attempt to respond. I did list discrepancies that I had located wherever. I do need assistance to untangle that.
There are issues that I have not included, such as:
(diff) 06:08, 19 June 2006 . . Theresa knott (talk | contribs | block) (removing innapropriate photo of living persons who ar not vandals)
(diff) 02:56, 19 June 2006 . . Crazytales56297 (talk | contribs | block) (Reverted vandalism by 71.102.31.67 to last version by 71.117.39.12. Please do not compromise the integrity of pages.)
A later version of that is linked in my signature; however, that very first click has not been seen since.
I do want to userfy the very original, w/ the summary list that you have just pasted; you should, all of you should, know that w/o that photograph, I might not have begun an account.
I did, very much, comprehend ip; however, I did not know how it would relate to wiki. I did not comprehend discussionpage. I did see "[edit]", which I clicked. It said sign, so, I had meditated, do I want to sign? I, nearly typed "DonFphrnqTaub Persina"; but, I put "D. F. T. P.". Upon seeing that photograph, I had decided, well, regardless of how this is done, & regardless of the several times that I had attempted previously, this time, I shall ensure that someone sees my comment.
&, those two men may, or may not, have ever seen a wiki; there is no way to be certain.
If I could get a telephone-number, to them, to their talent-agent, their talent-manager, I would call.
It is ironic, about how these wikipriests whine, typewritten-wikiwhine, about a victim article, yet they would abuse those men. Does any priest practice what they priest_(disambiguation)?
Imagine the further insult if we could only refer to him sneakily, surreptitiously, on a comment page, here, & there,... Yike.
Did you comprehend what I had said about "Lot's wife"? Amongst the most famous persons with no actual name. I am extremely ignostic, that being one of trillions of reasons.
It may be that I offend you; possibly, you agree with them. You may consider my advocacy ridiculous; I do not know.
Someone has retroactively named [ three early women? three early girls? ]:
Mrs. Frank. Never! This is the most precious gift I’ve ever had!
[She sits, showing her present to the others. ANNE hurries back to the satchel and pulls out a scarf, the scarf that MR. FRANK found in the first scene.]
Anne (offering it to her father). For Pim.
Mr. Frank.
Anneke . . . I wasn’t supposed to have a present! (He takes it, unfolding it and showing it to the others.)
Anne. It’s a muffler . . . to put round your neck . . . like an ascot, you know. I made it myself out of odds and ends. . . . I knitted it in the dark each night, after I’d gone to bed. I’m afraid it looks better in the dark!
Mr. Frank (putting it on). It’s fine. It fits me perfectly. Thank you,
I did translate that quote from another website; & I did translate the original pages from the movie that I've linked.
However, I did not translate any of it from any language; whereas, Mr. Frank had done much of his work in North America, he had certainly intended his edits of his daughter's work, including any aliases that they would mutually employ. I do not think that he had intended any of his books, documentaries, movies, speeches, et al, to mumble. His work screams intent & purpose, including their names.
Her work, however, was not intentionally planned for anyone but herself; but, his work is an obvious statement that as badly as things had gone in the intervening time, she might not mind so much his violating her privacy. Therefore, I would infer that every characteristic of their combined work has fully earned any documentation & promotion that it could have. That terrorist government would have opposed those of us who advocate maximizing electronic democracy.
Further, it is obvious from the above script that her father had called her two different nicknames in some ninety seconds.
Furthermore, all words are, to some extent, a translation of the language of the previous era, of half a century ago, or a century ago. As an example, I had heard that the compound word kidnap had come to use regarding Charles Augustus Lindbergh; as I cannot locate such confirmation on this website, & it would be enormous to verify it elsewhere, I concede that my example is not verified.
However, language does continually evolve, so everything is a translation from a previous era.
In either event, I had verified it by viewing the movie, &, again, on that website, as above quoted. Regarding the website, I've copied that; I do not know how to copy the movie.
Of [ nearly ] three years experience, there are various persons on this website who are prohibited from earning credibility, regardless; one of them is DonFphrnqTaub Persina.
I do need to negotiate the status of my other comments on this page as well!!!! No one owns a telephone; no one is in California. I am required to concede that I use a screenreader, though I do not recall having seen one, nor do I recall having touched one, have no idea how it operates. If I ever have had one, then it would have been misplaced, particularly as I certainly did not recognize what it had been. In any case, I do not recall any such experience.
I, certainly would like to try it; it might assist w/ disability-access; but, I am only guessing that it might help.
I have used a driver license tonight; if there is blood on the fender, not enough to noticeably drip. No blind here, except, I am, obviously, blind as to how to communicate effectively.
Considering what these characters had thought of Green Police, I do have a dire fear that some other article would ever be created, diminishing their experience, @: GreenPolice, greenpolice, green police, or any similar spelling. I do advocate that those titles would be blocked, permanently, for forever.
Greetings Hopiakuta/Archive 7, I see you're up for adoption, and I'm in the market. If ever you need advice or answers, just ask me -- any question, any time. I'd like to help however I can. Happy editing - Draeco (talk) 17:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do review everything on this page, particularly each wikilink that I add, very carefully, then, Thank You.
Dear xe,
You have suggested that I would place what I would arbitrate & negotiate in a sandbox page; I do continue to contend that that would be a less than appropriate name f/ what I would say; I did create a page today, however, which I do intend to employ f/ this purpose.
Please do go to the most recent comment to add a comment.
I cannot seem to elicit comment about Roman, Sam, Lot's wife, Lucy, Ida, Emmett, Jeunes,......
We have no control over the Google cache... –xenotalk 22:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this list does overwhelm you, I can empathize w/ that, as I do overwhelm myself, & most everyone else.
You can see that I have created that arbitrate page, today; I could just copy several of my most crucial messages over to that if that is your preference.
You have accomplished much in the past few days, a very large, huge, amount; however, it is merely a platform for what is next needed, in order to achieve disability-access.
But, you have made that laurel barnstar slightly more real, since you had sent it.
Anyhow, if it is better to copy these over, for a bulk forward, then I would do that, & then, hopefully, they would respond appropriately.
To me, that is one meaning of caché, to me, to my thought;
I do suspect that someone has sent a message to google & yahoo! to not list much of what I create: w/ all of the people who label me disruptive vandal, why should I think otherwise?
Anyhow, this page is blocked.
So, I guess that I need to work on that other page, that is, if you are yet willing to forward it.
All user talk pages are prevented from being searched in Google. Unless you add to the page "{{index}}". "He" is fine =) –xenotalk 04:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikimedia Foundation
Error
العربية Bahasa Indonesia Česky Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά English Español فارسی Français עברית Italiano 日本語 한국어
Nederlands Norsk (Bokmål) Polski Português Română Русский Српски Suomi Svenska ไทย Tiếng Việt Türkçe 繁體中文 简体中文
English
Our servers are currently experiencing a technical problem. This is probably temporary and should be fixed soon. Please try again in a few minutes.
You may be able to get further information in the #wikipedia channel on the Freenode IRC network.
The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organisation which hosts some of the most popular sites on the Internet, including Wikipedia. It has a constant need to purchase new hardware. If you would like to help, please donate.
If you report this error to the Wikimedia System Administrators, please include the details below.
العربية
تواجه خوادمنا الآن مشاكل تقنية. هذا في الأغلب بشكل مؤقت ومتوقع إصلاحه قريبا. من فضلك عاود التحميل بعد دقائق قليلة.
يمكنك الحصول على معلومات أكثر في #ويكيبيديا على شبكة الآيآرسي فرينود.
مؤسسة ويكيميديا والتي تستضيف بعضا من أشهر مواقع الإنترنت مثل ويكيبيديا الموسوعة الحرة، هي منظمة غير هادفة للربح. تحتاج المنظمة دائما عتاد جديد للحاسوب بشكر مستمر فإن أردت المساعدة، من فضلك تبرع لأجل منظمة ويكيميديا.
إذا أردت إبلاغ هذا الخطأ إلى إداريي ويكيميديا، من فضلك ضمن التفاصيل بالأسفل.
Česky
Naše servery mají momentálně technické problémy. Pravděpodobně se jedná o dočasnou závadu, která by měla být brzy opravena. Prosíme, zkuste za několik minut stránku nahrát znovu.
Další informace lze získat na IRC kanálu #wikipedia-cs v síti FreeNode.
Wikimedia Foundation je nezisková organizace, která spravuje některé z nejpopulárnějších serverů na internetu, včetně Wikipedie. Neustále potřebuje nakupovat nové hardwarové vybavení. Pokud byste chtěli pomoct, přispějte.
Pokud hlásíte tuto chybu administrátorům systémů Wikimedia, prosíme připojte následující podrobnosti.
Ελληνικά
Οι διακομιστές μας αυτή την στιγμή παρουσιάζουν ένα τεχνικό πρόβλημα. Αυτό είναι πιθανά προσωρινό και θα διορθωθεί σύντομα. Παρακαλούμε δοκιμάστε ξανά σε λίγα λεπτά.
Μπορεί να λάβετε περισσότερες πληροφορίες στο κανάλι #wikipedia στο δίκτυο IRC Freenode.
Το Ίδρυμα Wikimedia είναι ένας μη κερδοσκοπικός οργανισμός που φιλοξενεί ορισμένους από τους πιο δημοφιλής ιστότοπους στο διαδίκτυο συμπεριλαμβάνοντας την Βικιπαίδεια. Βρίσκεται σε μόνιμη ανάγκη αγοράς νέου hardware. Εάν θέλετε να βοηθήσετε παρακαλούμε κάντε μια δωρεά.
Εάν αναφέρετε αυτό το σφάλμα στου Διαχειριστές Συστημάτων του Wikimedia, παρακαλούμε συμπεριλάβετε τις παρακάτω πληροφορίες.
Español
Los servidores de la Fundación Wikimedia están teniendo dificultades técnicas. Este problema es temporal y esperamos arreglarlo cuanto antes. Por favor intenta acceder nuevamente dentro de unos minutos.
Puedes obtener más información en el canal #wikipedia-es de la red IRC FreeNode.
La Fundación sin ánimo de lucro Wikimedia aloja algunos de los sitios más visitados en Internet, incluyendo Wikipedia, y necesita comprar hardware nuevo constantemente. Si deseas ayudarnos, haz por favor una donación.
Si informas de este error a los administradores del sistema, por favor indica los detalles siguientes.
Nederlands
Onze servers ondergaan op dit moment een technisch probleem. Dit is waarschijnlijk tijdelijk en zal zo snel mogelijk verholpen worden. Probeer het opnieuw over enkele minuten.
Voor meer informatie kunt u terecht op het kanaal #wikipedia-nl op het FreeNode IRC-netwerk.
De Wikimedia Foundation is een organisatie zonder winstoogmerk die enkele van de meest populaire sites op Internet beheert, waaronder Wikipedia. We moeten continu nieuwe hardware bijkopen. Indien u wilt helpen, doe dan alstublieft een donatie.
Indien u deze fout meldt aan de systeembeheerders van Wikimedia Foundation, vermeld dan alstublieft onderstaande details.
Русский
На серверах фонда «Викимедиа» возникли технические трудности. Проблема, скорее всего, носит временный характер и вскоре будет устранена. Пожалуйста, попробуйте обновить страницу через несколько минут.
Дополнительную информацию можно получить посетив IRC-канал #wikipedia-ru сети «Freenode».
Фонд «Викимедиа» (Wikimedia Foundation) — некоммерческая организация, размещающая и обслуживающая несколько наиболее популярных в Интернете сайтов, в том числе — Википедию. Фонд испытывает постоянную потребность в приобретении нового оборудования. Вы можете помочь, сделав пожертвование.
Если вы решите сообщить об ошибке нашему системному администратору, пожалуйста, передайте ему следующую техническую информацию.
العربية Bahasa Indonesia Česky Dansk Deutsch Eesti Ελληνικά English Español فارسي Français 한국어 Italiano עברית Nederlands
日本語 Norsk (Bokmål) Polski Português Română Русский Српски Suomi Svenska ไทย Tiếng Việt Türkçe 繁體中文 简体中文
I do know that many of these people despise my pasting error messages; but, it is one way of expressing frustration; I cannot conceive of how doing so is so horrific: imagine the wiki horror movie: he posts error messages, on a bloody keyboard. Which computer companies would vie_(disambiguation) for sponsorship? The advertizing card could be a knife impaling a mouse: "computerciderific".
&, yes, it does mean that I need to move it more often, & need:
Is there a tool/gadget/script/whatever that allows a user to archive a page semi-automatically, in a manner similar to what MiszaBot does? RamiR 12:53, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good question. Would certainly be useful for pages not active enough to warrant a bot... –xenotalk 12:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Much of this website is indecipherable, this is one example:
"Wikipedia talk:NOINDEX of noticeboards
" hl en&q%22DonFphrnqTaub+Persina%22&meta a Google search for a person's real name which coughs up an admin noticeboard subpage on the second ...
"57 KB (9,117 words) - 06:43, 13 September 2008"
I made a mistake regarding editing your pages. At first I thought this filewikipedia_:_files_for_deletion/2009_November_28 was a non-free image. And because non-free images are only supposed to be used in articles, I removed the file from non-article pages. I now believe I was wrong to think the file was non-free so I undid my edits. I apologise for any confusion I caused.--Rockfang (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* * * Alrignt, i'll be glad to help if you have any questions. you may want to add this template to your userpage: <nowiki>{{adoptoffer|ryan shell}}<nowiki>. it'll move you fraom a category of people requestion to people who have been offered. if you want to become offically adopted, but let me know.
* * * p.s. i dont mind either comparison; in fact, i used to have a red-eared slider as a pet!
Please do place your comment @ bottom; do not alter my signature, &/or edit structure:
Hey, I saw your user page on the Wikipedians needing adoption page, and would like to offer myself as an adopter. This situation does seem a bit more complicated, so it may take more time for both of us. By the way, I am willing to give you my phone number if needed as part of the adoption process. Thanks, and you may respond here. Netalarmtalk 15:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hopiakuta, thanks for bringing to our attention the vandalism that happened on the Sputnik program article. Of course, Henry Ford has nothing to do there. This was just a vandalism introduced in this edit, where an anon replaced "Sergei Korolev" by "Henry Ford". I have reverted this, and I have also removed your {{clarify}} template as I think everything is now clear. In future, if you see obvious vandalism such as this you may just revert it yourself! -- Ekjon Lok (talk) 05:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Hopiakuta, the "Henry Ford" was just a vandalism introduced in this edit. I have reverted it. In future, if you see obvious vandalism such as this you can just revert it yourself. -- Ekjon Lok (talk) 04:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do note my actual name.
Yes, I could have done that; but, not knowing the actual correction might have been simply sloppy; if you know it better,....
I had not been aware that it had been the current edit.
If you check my history, there are a couple hundred looking f/ an excuse to call me disruptive vandal; please do comment.
Regarding your edits to the talk page of the Sputnik page, I must certainly say that you have done the right thing! You have brought our attention to the vandalism that happened there, which has now been corrected. If you are indeed in doubt about something on some page, then bringing it up on the talk page is absolutely the right thing to do. In this particular instance it was obvious that the information was wrong: Henry Ford couldn't possibly have had anything to do with a Russian space program! -- Ekjon Lok (talk) 02:25, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; but, this is regarding nearly four years:
If you check my history, there are a couple hundred looking f/ an excuse to call me disruptive vandal; please do comment.
Greeting again, Hopiakuta. The adoption template has remained on your user page over a month, despite you having received several adoption offers. I also notice you haven't had a contribution in several weeks. As the persistence of this template is clogging our list here, I'm going to remove it. I hope you won't mind; please let me know if there's a problem. - Draeco (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Misspellings of "Occasion" as "Occassion" and "Confectionery" as "Confectionary" on a shopfront in the United Kingdom. Misspellings on a shop front in St Mary’s Shopping Centre, Thornbury, South Gloucestershire, England. Occasion has been misspelled Occassion and Confectionery has been misspelled Confectionary. Taken by Adrian Pingstone in September 2004 and released to the public domain.
A misspelling of purchased on a service station sign. Misspelt sign at a garage at Bagstone, north of Bristol, England. Purchased has been misspelt as Purchesed. To save embarrassment the telephone number has been blurred. Taken by Adrian Pingstone in August 2004 and released to the public domain.
Is there some reason you think whop should redirect to whopper?
I was looking up radio station WHOP and, yes, I know I could just use the shift key, but I didn't.Vchimpanzee· talk·contributions· 16:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote a complete whopper_(disambiguation) fraud hours after you had changed it; all of the reasons are in the historylog of the target dab page, in this particular case.
Hello Hopiakuta, I'd be willing to take you on as an adoptee. Please take a look at my adoption program so that you'll get an idea of what I will offer. Also I notice you're quite an experienced user, are you sure Adoption is right for you? Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 8:24pm • 09:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My edit counter shows something called deleted edits, but I don't know what it means I saw that you have a subpage for your deleted edits, so I thought you would be a good person to ask. What are deleted edits? Please respond on my talk page or send me a talk back template. Thank you and happy editing! plumaØ 02:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, man, please, fix your signature so that it actually links to your userpage/talkpage, and remove those other misleading links. The thing is quite confusing as it stands, nor should you have to be asked multiple times. — Isarra༆ 18:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That is not how I read the rule; that first person got it from a comment that has been ignored for several months.
Further, everything about my signature is about handicappism. You could see that if you had paid attention.
I await you enforcing your rules equally, which cannot happen amongst a racist handicappist fascist plutocracy oligarchy. Period.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Non productive comments, closing.Safiel (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content
I just saw a new socialist motto:
« Wisconsin: Forward: Walker. »
Keep & edit, edit, edit, edit. It now can include so many Wisconsin items, per Rachel Anne Maddow, wonderful. Save the page. Also: « Toyota: Moving forward with America », @ 200 miles per hour, over a cliff, with the accelerator & brake pedal stuck,..... hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 02:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hopiakuta, I see that you've been in contact with Xeno in the past. I am willing to assist, if you need assistance, but you have to do a few things for us as well. Your signature is first, in my opinion; your talk and user page are second--I can barely type here since the page is so full of stuff that to me is incomprehensible as well as copies in many languages of notifications et cetera. This is making it very difficult to communicate. I hope you will respond in a different way than you did last time. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:35, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:Hopiakuta/ simple edit summary. Since you had some involvement with the User:Hopiakuta/ simple edit summary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Drmies (talk) 04:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You do not address me by name; you do know what it is.
You make threats & commands, in gibberish, & much of what you say needs spellcheck, and you do neither specify the foundation for any of these nor your authority as to whom died & made you führer. You are physically incapable of reading any comment negative about wikimedia.
If you ever send me anything again, please send it through a translator, as it takes far too long to decipher incomprehensible comments.
Most of your comments are incomprehensible twitter references & insults. You are incapable of courtesy, logic, nor verification.
Your signature as it stands now is extremely disruptive. You have been asked several times to change it to comply with Wikipedia:Signatures; if you do not do so, I will be forced to block you until you do.
In addition, please use descriptive edit summaries; I see from your history that you have been posting mostly nonsense/random links as your edit summaries. This is also quite disruptive, and I would quite appreciate it if you would stop.
Thank you, and let me know if you have any questions. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 17:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
wikipedia_:_files_for_deletion/2009_November_28 
[edit].png){kind=logo}
blame, wikiblame, might seem more assume bad faith than assume good faith, | blame, wikiblame, might seem more assume bad faith than assume good faith, [[ hopiakutaPlease do sign your communiqué.~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina.]] 11:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
wikipedia_:_files_for_deletion/2009_November_28 was a non-free image. And because non-free images are only supposed to be used in articles, I removed the file from non-article pages. I now believe I was wrong to think the file was non-free so I undid my edits. I apologise for any confusion I caused.--Rockfang (talk) 10:25, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey there Hopiakuta, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User talk:Hopiakuta. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
