User talk:Hoppeduppeanut

Welcome!

Hello, Hoppeduppeanut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Stalwart111 11:35, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Hoppeduppeanut, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Hoppeduppeanut! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.--I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the 'Lifeboats of the Titanic' Article

I simply changed "to full" to "too full".(63.230.3.210 (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC))

My apologies, I have reverted my edit for you. Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 01:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

That was no lie on Boston Massacre.

Boston has suffered its first newsworthy massacre in 243 years. Why revert the truth? Only revert lies. --70.179.161.230 (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

The edit was reverted not necessarily because it wasn't the truth, but in the context of the article it was written in, it could be seen as unconstructive. I have taken the liberty of adding a {{for}} template at the top of the page which directs to the Wikipedia page about the Boston Marathon Bombings for you. Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 04:14, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping an eye out on the Guam page.

Thank you. Sprinkler21 (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Sprinkler21

Regarding Goudurix

Hi, I saw you reverted my edit on Goudurix that I made with my IP, and I wanted to let you know the only reason I didn't cite a source (which I have) is because I could not figure out how to edit the { { reflist } } tag at the bottom of the page, where the normal reference list usually is. If you could help, that'd be great.

Thanks,

Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 00:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I have added a citation in for you. Note that adding a citation usually automatically updates the {{reflist}} tag. For your reference, you can cite websites by using the Cite web template, and enclosing this template in <ref> tags.

This is the syntax used to cite your contribution:

<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.ushsho.com/detailedsteelrollercoasterpollresults2012.htm
|title=Detailed Steel Roller Coaster Poll Results 2012
|website=BestRollerCoasterPoll.com
|accessdate=19 May 2013}}</ref>

My apologies for reverting your edit, it has been added back in with this citation. You may edit it with another suitable citation as you see fit! Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Not an issue at all, thank you for showing me. That was the specific citation I wanted in the first place.

Regards, Belugaboy^{cup of tea?} 01:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Regarding change on To Speak of Wolves.

I had corrected an improperly spelled name from Drew Faulk, to Drew Fulk to give him his respective credit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.9.22.89 (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

You also added "Weiner" as a nickname of one of the former members, which was interpreted by myself as vandalism. This was why the edit was originally reverted. Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

I guess one of my friends decided to man the keyboard amidst doing that. My apologies.

Lyrics needed to be added

Hi, I want to know why the "complete" lyrics of popular songs cannot be used here. I just want to know, thanks! 72.87.175.235 (talk) 22:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi 72.87.175.235, complete song lyrics from poular artists unfortunately cannot be added to Wikipedia without explicit permission from the copyright holder. As most popular musicians do not release their works under an open content license, their inclusion on Wikipedia violates their copyright. This is why your contribution had to be removed. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright and Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry for more information. Thanks! Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Kelvin Mateus de Oliveira - Reply

Hi there PEANUT, AL from Portugal here,

i known i should have assumed good faith, but quite frankly at this stage (nearly seven years of editing), i must be 99% "i spotted a vandal", 1% "assume good faith". That edit i angrily reverted was too strange not to be vandalism, but my reaction was exaggerated.

Sorry for any inconvenience, happy weekend --AL (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Confused by msg from you regarding edit I didn't make

Got this message from you: "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Underdevelopment. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hoppeduppeanut (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)" But I've actually never in my life made an edit at Wikipedia and as far as I can recall have never visited the Underdevelopment page either. So there's some confusion somewhere. Anyway, best of luck.Frank Kogan (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hoppeduppeanut. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hoppeduppeanut. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)