User talk:Horologium/April 2011

Honesty

"excluding information is not the same as dishonesty." Yes it is, if the issue is very well sourced, well-known and extremely relevant to the article in question (covering many statements made by the person the article is about over a period of years by now.) Get used to it. In other words, get used to Wikipedia guidelines for inclusion.Jimmuldrow (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

There is nothing dishonest about what I have said or done. The level of detail you are trying to shoehorn into this article belongs in the daughter article, to which you added it a long time ago.

You apparently do not understand Wikipedia's policy on consensus, which trumps inclusion guidelines, unless you are able to demonstrate why consensus is wrong. You have failed to do so, and if you attempt to re-insert that material into the article again, I will visit the Arbitration Enforcement page and ask that you get topic-banned from all Sarah Palin-related articles. Your tendentious editing of a BLP has gone on far too long, and it appears that you are unwilling to accept the community's consensus. Horologium (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

It appears that won't be necessary. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 23:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

And for that matter, Mr. Muldrow: Why are you addressing Horologium while refuting my words? I'm the one who told you "excluding information is not the same as dishonesty." And now you come after Horologium for it? At least direct your refutations at the right person. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 13:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I had noticed that; he also ascribed your words to me in the long diatribe he posted on his talk page after he received a 48-hour block last month for the same activity. It's of little import, though, particularly since he's now topic-banned on Palin-related articles and he and I don't have any other overlap. I don't get involved in US Civil War articles, which appears to be his other focus. I just wish he'd been able to abide by consensus before getting topic-banned. Horologium (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Nagyon köszönöm

Köszönöm!

Köszönöm a kedvességét.
Köszönjük, hogy az ember vagy:
kedves és figyelmes,
érzékeny és figyelmes,
A nagyvonalú és figyelmes adakozót.
Ön önzetlen mindig,
üzembe mások előtt magát,
éreztem magam különleges és fontos.
Ez egy kiváltság és öröm, hogy ismerlek.

Ön olyan személy,
aki megkönnyíti az életet és a jobb
mindenki körülötted.
Ön folyamatosan jár
Az előzékenység
és kedvesség
felderül minden nap.
Mit tettél velem
felvillan emlékezetemben,
frissítő kellemes érzéseket
minden alkalommal,
amikor belegondolok.
Hálás vagyok, hogy,
és én köszönöm.

—J.Z., egy magyar barátja

Köszönöm, bár én nem vagyok biztos benne, mit tettem, hogy kaptak ilyen dicséretet. Horologium (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)