User talk:Hot Pork Pie

WELCOME TO HOT PORK PIE'S PAGE User Talk My Contributions My Sandbox Guestbook 'Awards & WikiLove subpages Photo's

Welcome!

Hello, Hot Pork Pie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TF ^{{ Contribs } { Edit Quest! }} 14:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ('User:Hot Pork Pie/recent2.js');

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Amortias (T)(C) 19:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Hot Pork Pie. You have new messages at Amortias's talk page.
Message added 19:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Amortias (T)(C) 19:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse invite

Hello! Hot Pork Pie, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 20:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Lake Del Valle

Hi! What does this sentence mean? "The lake serves in part as off-stream storage over sees in the lake. " Ttwaring (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Fixed! Thanks! Ttwaring (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

User Page Vandalism

Many thanks for your vigilance. However I feel guilty because I made the change after forgetting to sign in. Nevertheless I very much appreciate what you did - I will be more careful in future, to avoid false alarms. Catsmeat (talk) 12:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Catsmeat no worries, glade to have sort of been of help......X0. Best Regards.Hot Pork Pie (talk) 12:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Deleting page

Deletion of new article about "Helmholtz Institute Ulm"

Dear Diana,

yesterday you placed a tag for deletion of a freshly created page about the "Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU)". There were some concerns about copyright and a justification why this article should be published in Wikipedia. Before I had any opportunity to react, the page was deleted and the whole work was in vain. I would have replied the following: 1. Copyright: in fact, there are passages which wre taken from the website of the institute in a slightly modified form. However, as I am the Exxecutive Director of the institute, there are no issues with copyright. I am the owner of the content. 2. Relevance: the HIU is a unique battery research institute in Europe, there is no comparable institute of that size, following such a strict interdisciplinary approach in the development of novel battery concepts. From the current 5 alternative concepts to Li ion batteries, 2 have been developed and presented by HIU. In two other concepts, HIU has recently achieved world records in the performance of these systems.

It would be great if these arguments would be accepted by Wiki and if there would be the opportunity to continue with the article.

Kind Regards Maximilian Fichtner alias BattMan

BattMan (talk) 09:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

@BattMan: hey there, I can only presume that because the last time I checked my name wasn't Diana X) and I have not edited "Helmholtz Institute Ulm" what so ever that that message was not meant for me. Best Regards :). Hot Pork Pie (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Tahuichi Academy

Hi, just to let you know I have declined a speedy deletion nomination you made on Tahuichi Academy. WP:A1 says "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate". As the name of the academy is given along with several links it is clear that A1 is not applicable to this article. Nthep (talk) 19:44, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@Nthep: okay, cheers for letting me know of my error. please could you tell me the best place to get more familiar with speedy deletion process. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

sure. The best page is WP:CSD where all the criteria are detailed. You need to understand that they are deliberately tightly defined so their use is also tight. For example there is no CSD criterion for software but people try and use the A7 web content tag instead and then wonder why the nomination was declined. CSD is about getting rid of that content that frankly will never be encyclopedic, if there is the slightest hint that the article could (note could not is) become encyclopedic then CSD probably isn't appropriate. The next time you feel you want to place a CSD tag on an article, just check against the criteria and if the one you choose isn't fully met then don't tag it. That doesn't stop you PRODING or sending the article to WP:AFD it just says not suitable for speedy deletion. Nthep (talk) 23:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

@Nthep: thanks again, I will make sure I read up on those suggested places.Hot Pork Pie (talk) 11:41, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Not a problem. Patrolling pages is important but equally important is that it gets done correctly and we all make mistakes so no-one is going to be too bothered about getting the odd one wrong. I'm not saying this applies to you but one thing that can annoy experienced editors is new editors being trigger happy and not thinking before applying finger to keyboard. Nthep (talk) 14:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

A cookie for you

Allthefoxes has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--allthefoxes ^(Talk) 20:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

YG TEDDIE LEE

Hello I was wondering how was naming Teddie Lee's real name and where he came from unconstructive and disruptive? For example, it is allowed that Yang Hongseok was able to be listed as a Cube Trainee, whilst Teddie was not allowed to be called a MYDOL trainee when he was in fact a MYDOL/Jellyfish Ent trainee? It seems kind of strange. Alicia leo86 (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there

My apologies if my previous message about Teddie Lee was rude. I didn't intend it that way. Alicia leo86 (talk) 14:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey There Again.

@Alicia leo86: no need to apologies, I did not feel in anyway that you where being rude to me. you have every right if you feel an editor has made a mistake to address the matter with them. Best Regards and happy editing. Hot Pork Pie 14:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey There.

Hi@173.187.168.2: I realized that I have made an error by issuing that warning and have there for-striked through it and made it clear to other editors that it was made in error. I apologies for that. cheers for pulling me up on it. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie 21:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Typo fixing

Fixing typos is a laudable goal, but please pay more attention to what you're doing. You broke a url with this edit, and I see from your contributions that you've been doing the same in other articles. You also shouldn't correct typos in the titles of sources, as you did with this edit, or edit other peoples talk page comments as you did here. See WP:DONTFIX for more examples of typos that should be left alone. Thanks. DoctorKubla (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@DoctorKubla: hey there. you are correct I do need to pay more attention to the spelling corrections I make.I see that you have corrected them which I thank-you for I also thankyou for your advice. Could you tell me, is that the only ones or should I go through the contributions and see if there's more. Best Regards & thanks again. Hot Pork Pie 12:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

No worries; this is a learning experience. I didn't check all your recent edits, so yes, you should go through them yourself to be sure. DoctorKubla (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@DoctorKubla: okay will do. cheers. Hot Pork Pie 13:33, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

 Done@DoctorKubla:

168.221.157.196

Hi - you told this IP user that he would be blocked if he continued editing Cellular respiration. Well, guess what? He did. Are you an admin? Seems like time to take action. :) cbdorsett (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey There @Cbdorsett: glade to see he has been block.....one less parasite vandalizing WP, althought I don't think that 31 hour ban is sufficient considering the amount of vandalism he/she was apart of. And are you suggesting I should become admin??? if so I'm flatterd but I haven't a considerable amount of contributions or have I been on WP long enough to warrant admin status. Best RegardsHot Pork Pie 15:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

User talk page edit

Hi Hot Pork Pie, with this edit [1], you are effectively re-installing that the User is a "child abuser"? I rolled the page back earlier to what appears to be the normal version, but maybe I missed something? Cheers, Horseless Headman (talk) 20:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC).

@Horseless Headman: well spotted on my balls-up, thanks for reverting that.Hot Pork Pie 20:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

• Ah I see you noticed already, I was surprised to see it reverted by a "real" User instead of some angry IP :-) Horseless Headman (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC).

@Horseless Headman: yep I beat you too it considering what was posted wanted too give him/her a final warning but I see you have already attached a notice to this users talk page.Hot Pork Pie 20:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:BoxOfChickens, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 22:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy

Hi there, just letting you know i've declined a speedy deletion at Vince Dunn as it contains a credible claim of significance, as the subject plays for a notable club, and there's multiple Google hits for him. If you feel the subject does not meet WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG you could consider sending it to articles for deletion. Cheers. Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 19:22, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Thompson.matthew: not probs,cheers for letting me know. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie 19:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm Krj373. An edit that you recently made to Linheraptor seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Test edits reverted by user that created them. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey there@Krj373: that was not a test edit what appeared to of happened was we where both trying to revert the vandalism created by 165.234.100.30 but you got there before me so I ended up reverting you revert instead if that makes sense (: I did revert it back though. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie 16:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Hot Pork Pie/vadalism

I moved this to User:Hot Pork Pie/vandalism which is presumably what you meant. BC108 (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Hot Pork Pie. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:12, 25 January 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hot Pork Pie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)