User talk:Hublolly

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Hublolly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 00:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please be reasonable to other editors, if you know how WP operates...[edit]

Copied here for the record

Please do NOT antagonize User:JohnBlackburne who is a good faith editor (those links you gave show it), and please do NOT personally attack people like you did to Quondum - that was atrocious and as far from funny as could be..., and please do not edit other peoples comments. [1] =( ...

Both editors have a phenomenal amount of knowledge on maths and physics - far greater than mine, and are far more productive and constructive and valuable editors to the encylopedia than I am. =) F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 00:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Foff - your name is F = q(E + v × B) right? Hublolly (talk) 00:43, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is "foff" supposed to mean? F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 01:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WTF do you think!? :-) Hublolly (talk) 01:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already know what it means, maybe the correct question was why. Forget it F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 06:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

90-IQ indeed! You took time to figure it out really. Hublolly (talk) 07:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it. Your edits are becoming disruptive, in spite of the good faith we assume of you. =( F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 08:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PLease stop-please don't do this-that-the other-no attacks-no antagonizing-no disparging... how many rules are there?? You even have the link "Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means" on YOUR talk page - so why tell me around??. :-(

Hublolly (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference for exterior product?[edit]

If you are so keen, please provide reference(s) for your insertions, for reasons in the link. I reverted again, for reasons on talk:Ricci calculus#The wedge product returns.... Please collaborate with the editors over there. Thanks. F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 06:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be prepared for admin intervention...[edit]

Due to your continued Abuse of editing privileges, disruptive editing, vandalism, personal attacks, edit warring, violating WP:talk page guidelines, page blanking other people's work, and all the good faith we have assumed of you, we are going to report you to the WP:admins, and you may be blocked.

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You thoroughly offended user:Maschen [2][3] (and edits therefrom), who has sadly left WP because of depression (so it seems) while editing on WP. While some of his contributions may have been incorrect (who doesn't make mistakes?); all he really wanted was to help WP and certainly was a good-faith editor, and your demotivating edits only lower his already too-low-self-esteem state and drive away such hard-working and altruistic editors who actually do have an intense interest in the subjects of maths and physics, and WP was better before he left.

Not to mention you have made offensive comments to Quondum, JRSpriggs, LutzL, and (although indirectly they still count) Mgvongoeden and Rschwieb.

We have all had enough of this. You are clearly not acting in good faith - instead you are plainly vain and rude and are not even advancing WP anywhere near as much as the editors mentioned here. F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 21:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fake orange box[edit]

Please remove the fake "you have messages" bar from the top of your page immediately. It is disruptive in that it "tricks" editors into clicking away, then checking into their history to see what changed, when, in fact, they have not received a new message. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just pulled it off myself (given that he will not do it and will just argue that only his contributions are the only ones which "count"). F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 05:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Screw both of you - it was only for fun. Its MY user page and talk page - YOU TWO have what you like (look at the state of JRSpriggs's page full of what he likes to say and has to include, and Linas even has opposition against the admins or WTF ever...) - so I can have on them what I like. Reverted F=q(E+v^B)'s change to give him a taste of his own medicine... Why is it Maschen and F=q(E+v^B) have never been threatened to be blocked or banned or whatever after what they have done??

Why is the orange bar so disruptive anyway (WHY IS EVRYTHING I DONE "LABELLED DISRUPTIVE??"), it just one click, did you know you DON'T have click the button if it’s too much work or wastes the little time so many "busy" users have? Hublolly (talk) 07:03, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's disruptive because policy says so. WP:SMI says, "Fake user talk notification banners that mislead readers into thinking they have new messages are prohibited." Beyond that, it's just obviously disruptive: you've created a fake box that explicitly lies to user and does so by emulating the Wikimedia interface. If you can't see why that's disruptive, you clearly need to find another project to work on. If you continue to re-add box, you may have to be blocked to stop the disruption. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Sbyrnes321 with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 08:04, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User:Sbyrnes321 with this edit. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you, Jprg1966 ^(talk) 08:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:JohnBlackburne. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 08:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was not a personal attack - P0M typed my name wrong so I corrected it: it is Hublolly, not Loblolly or whatever. Is it not allowed to correct your own user name if someone accidentally gets it wrong? :-( Hublolly (talk) 08:29, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Maschen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You refactored somebody else's comment, including the heading, to turn it into a personal attack. Surely you realise that this is very far from acceptable behaviour and incompatible with collaborative editing. ([4], [5]) bonadea contributions talk 11:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look - anyone (for a handful: Sławomir Biały, Ozob, Jowa fan, user:Thenub314, user:Quondum, user:Dmcq, user:DVdm, user:Sbyrnes321) will all tell you that Maschen made mistakes - many of them were obvious. Hublolly (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined[edit]

I have declined your speedy deletion nominations on:

The only valid speedy deletion reasons for templates are at WP:CSD#Templates. If you think these should go, nominate them at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion, explaining what you propose should be done about the articles that transclude them, see for instance here. JohnCD (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are now attacking more than ever...[edit]

Now you are just annoying everyone. Presumably the block will happen anytime.

Seriously. Leave the editors alone - every single one you come across. Leave their user pages alone. Leave their talk pages alone. Leave their edits/contributions/posts alone. Leave even the links and diffs that include their names alone.

If you cannot even contribute positivley - leave Wikipedia.

F = q(E+v×B)⇄ ∑_ic_i 15:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good bye (as in I am leaving WP for a short break, not permanently). Hublolly (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]