User talk:HumCoArchivist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1st Battalion Mountaineers, and it appears to include a substantial copy of 701645,00.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any chance you will begin to use wikipedia guidelines for citations?[edit]

You have added rich material to the Fort Humboldt Article, but your in-text citation is not acceptable. Editors will begin to delete all your edits if you continue to add material without proper citation. Norcalal 06:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Interior_of_Fort_Humboldt.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Interior_of_Fort_Humboldt.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You are in a graduate program for librarians...[edit]

...but you refuse to provide correct or any citations for the work you do here. Why is that? Norcalal 06:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Norcalal, I don't refuse to provide correct citations, I am just learning how to do it on Wikipedia. HumCoArchivist 12 Oct 2009

Unable to find ... can you help?[edit]

I'm unable to find the references for the following:

In fact, Kinman was allegedly in Ford Theater the night of the assassination and witnessed the murder. Kinman continued escorting Lincoln's body on its way to burial. On April 26, 1865, the New York Times described Kinman: "Much attention was attracted to Mr. Kinman, who walked in a full hunting suit of buckskin and fur, rifle on shoulder. Mr. Kinman, it will be remembered, presented to Mr. Lincoln some time ago a chair made of California elk-horn, and continuing his acquaintance with him, it is said, enjoyed quite a long conversation with him the very day before the murder."

I'd love to be able to reference that! Smallbones (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

From HumCoArchivist: I have no idea how to communicate using Wiki, so I hope "Smallbones" gets this message. The source for the above is:

Source:

The Procession :EIGHT GRAND DIVISIONS THE SPECTATORS. THE START. THE MILITARY DIVISION. THE FUNERAL CAR. THE GUARD OF HONOR, THE DOG MOURNER. THE CIVILIAN PROCESSION. DETAILS AS TO CIVILIANS. FOREIGN UNIFORMS. A VIOLATION OF RULE. THE CALIFORNIA HUNTER. NATIONALITIES. THE END.. (1865, April 26). New York Times (1857-Current file),p. 1. Retrieved May 21, 2009, from ProQuest Historical Newspapers The New York Times (1851 - 2005) database. (Document ID: 88155017).

This looks quite good and I should be able to find it from here. My only question (to which I don't expect you to know the answer) is why isn't it in the New York Times own online database, which is supposed to be complete from 1851? Actually, I have a much more important question. How can I get a copy of Seth's memoirs?! e.g. could I send you a check, have you xerox and mail them? Will return after checking out ProQuest. Smallbones (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Got the article from query.nytimes.com thanks. The "allegedly at Fords Theater would also be nice to reference, but the memoirs would be golden to me. Thanks again. Smallbones (talk) 17:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

is now in line for a good article review. Now might be a good time to make any additions that you'd like. BTW see User:Smallbones for reference formats. Smallbones (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smallbones thanks for the reference formats. I'll give them a try soon. HumCoArchivist (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Park ranger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Newbury Park and Chumash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Offering Help[edit]

Hiya HumCoArchivist!! Great edit on Seth Kinman, thanks so much for linking to Fort Humboldt. Do you need any help with citation format? If so, please give me a holler and I'd be happy to help you! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ellin! I believe much more information (new info) can be gleaned from the Genzoli Collection at HSU. And thanks for your offer. I'm still learning. HumCoArchivist (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Smallbones has photo copies of the entire Genzoli box of Seth Kinman including photos, all the articles and papers. User:Nytasi and myself went up there earlier this year and worked with the librarian at the collection to get him everything he needs for working on Seth Kinman. Not every editor works on every page and Smallbones is such a Kinman fan that he's visited Ferndale, California and the Ferndale Museum as well as the Kinman landmarks around the county. He also met with the folks at the Museum to go through their Kinman files; as you know the Museum just put on a Kinman theatrical piece. I'm only peripheral to the Kinman scene here, I tend to work on places and history more than people. I saw your name on the watchlist as having made changes to Kinman and followed the links back to here, read the notes above, and offered help with citations if you desire! Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Roscoe E. Peithman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources and dubious notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kurepalaku (talk) 11:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Volunteers-In-Parks for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volunteers-In-Parks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volunteers-In-Parks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, HumCoArchivist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Royal Colonial Light Horse Brigade, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 20:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 14th Infantry Regiment (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Manila. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, HumCoArchivist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Royal Colonial Light Horse Brigade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Civil Air Patrol-U.S. Air Force, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's an existing article at Civil Air Patrol (with a child article at History of the Civil Air Patrol), you might find it more useful of your time to work on that article rather than your draft. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, HumCoArchivist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Civil Air Patrol-U.S. Air Force, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HumCoArchivist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Civil Air Patrol-U.S. Air Force".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Far West Repeater Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable amateur radio association

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]