User talk:Hxjstjz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2019[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 09:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hxjstjz (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

嗨,哥们,这真是件有意思的事情。可能在你的视角看来,我,作为一个新手,没有编辑什么其他内容,第一步编辑是直接回退了一个在en-wiki上属于公司的条目,也许这属于违禁行为,虽然我自己并不这么认为。然后直接被您这个管理员判定为了“editing for advertising or promotion”。

那你知道,在我的视角看来是什么吗?

我在zh-wiki编辑到了一款游戏——守墓人,英文译名为Graveyard Keeper。你知道他的开发商是哪个公司吗?没错,就是Lazy Bear Games,显然zh-wiki是没有Lazy Bear Games的条目的,本着“勇于更新页面”的原则,我打算用Link-en到英文条目Lazy Bear Games,等待他人编辑或者有一天我来创建这个条目。于是我点到了en-wiki的Lazy Bear Games,很奇怪的是重定向到了这个开发商的另一款游戏Punch Club。于是我翻开了Lazy Bear Games的历史,明明是有条目的,但是GSS将有文本的条目回退并创建了重定向。这里我得承认我没有仔细看他的第一条回退注明了“RV paid edits”,当时我并没有看到。然后我就回退成有文本的条目了。紧接着,瞬间我就收到了信息,又重新被回退回去了,于是我到Lazy Bear Games下发布一条讨论“Why redirect Lazy Bear Games to a game entry instead of itself?Lazy Bear Games is a game company, not a game。”然而并没有人与我讨论。您,作为一名管理员,既没有与我在Lazy Bear Games下讨论,是否该重定向(甚至直接把我在讨论下的内容回退了),也没有警告我,而是把我的讨论回退了,然后封禁了我。

真是民主呀,怎么比没有人权的某国还独裁?权力真是个好东西。希望您不要解封我,就这样吧,我不会再来en-wiki了,因为我的行为太恶意了,不要污染了这里。高贵的管理员,再见。在您的管理下,wiki一定会越来越好。

--Hxjstjz (talk) 12:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, please make your request in English.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm the creator of the article Graveyard Keeper and I just came across this block. Considering the failed check-user, the user's response, this user's history on the Chinese Wikipedia, and the fact that the redirect from Lazy Bear Games to Punch Club this user reverted truly makes zero sense, it seems like maybe.... just maybe the ban was a bit overzealous. --Elephanthunter (talk) 15:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]