User talk:I.O. Rugg

May 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm 331dot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Evangelos Zappas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking out trash is constructive editing 331dot. --- I.O. Rugg

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Petros Zappas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking out trash is a valid reason Hey man im josh. --- I.O. Rugg

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Konstantinos Zappas, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Petros Zappas. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking out trash is NOT disruptive Hey man im josh. Keeping trash is. --- I.O. Rugg

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I.O. Rugg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocking me isn't the solution. Taking out trash info is. --- I.O. Rugg

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.