User talk:IASONASHIOS

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Constantine Alexander-Goulandris has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. the wub "?!" 19:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Constantine Alexander-Goulandris constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Rmosler | ● 19:38, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine Alexander-Goulandris[edit]

As the author of this article, I am requesting that you please remove the article at this time until I fact-check certain aspects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IASONASHIOS (talk • contribs)

On October 2nd of 2010, you said that you had verified all of your facts. The comment is still below. At this point, the article had been worked on by others meaning that you cannot have it deleted as the only author. Also, replacing the text of the article with a message is never a good idea (it's vandalism). If you have concerns, discuss them on the article's talk page. OlYeller^Talktome 15:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, this person is real. If you have concerns about specific portions of the text, please say so here or on the article's talk page. OlYeller^Talktome 15:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When you start a WP:BLP article, it may be best to make it in a sandbox first. Second, make sure that it follows the policies for a BLP. Deleting or blanking the article is not necessary at this time, to my knowledge, it does not appear to contain negative or libelous statements. It can be tagged as needing references and yourself and the rest of the community can work together to make a more reliable sourced article. Rmosler | ● 19:56, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please remove the article at this time until I check its complete authenticity? I have been threatened with a libel suit and I simply want to check my facts before requesting its re-publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IASONASHIOS (talk • contribs)

I tagged the article for deletion. It should be gone soon. OlYeller^Talktome 21:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now verified all my facts and feel confident to re-publish. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IASONASHIOS (talk • contribs)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Goula.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Goula.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I myself took this photo in 2009, in Monte Carlo and authorize its public use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IASONASHIOS (talk • contribs)

This work of art is distributed under the Free Art License. You are free to redistribute it and/or modify it according to terms of this license.

ArtLibre.org

— Preceding unsigned comment added by IASONASHIOS (talk • contribs)

File:Goula.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goula.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Constantine Alexander-Goulandris, you may be blocked from editing. OlYeller^Talktome 06:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Constantine Alexander-Goulandris, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A link to a definition of the New York Times is not a reference. If you claim again that you have added a reference by simply linking to another article or homepage of a website, you will be blocked.

Is there's something that you're not understanding that I can help with? I'm guessing but it seems that English may not be your primary language. If so, I can try to find someone that can help explain the issue and work with you on edits. OlYeller'^Talktome 16:41, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]