User talk:IEsuredI

August 2017[edit]

Hello, you deleted the page on Gaius Servilius Structus Ahala (consul 478 BC). I believe this was a mistake. He was a consul (one of two leaders) of the Roman Republic, which by itself warrants him having his own page. I'm sure there was more detail on his page which made him relevant, but you deleted the page so speedily that I can't access it anymore to explain why his page should remain. Please reinstate it. Urg writer. Urg writer (talk) 10:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Urg writer (talk): Discuss the deletion with the deleting admin Alex Shih (talk).

IEsuredI (talk) 04:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Chinese wars and battles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Operation Thunderbolt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dtully98[edit]

Please do not warn editors for vandalism unless it's clearly vandalism. Their edits to Lebor na Cert are unsourced, but appear to have been made in good faith. The edit to French Revolution is disruptive POV pushing, and I warned them for that. Short of egregious cases, editors should not be reported to AIV unless they've been appropriately warned. Acroterion (talk) 01:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of User-4488 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 03:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]