User talk:ILuvAMRadio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SkagitRiverQueen. Thank you... Doc9871 (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and I have blocked you for sock puppetry. TFOWR 10:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ILuvAMRadio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Logged on to edit this morning and found I was blocked. I've been around the internet a while and know what a sockpuppet is. I'm not a sockpuppet. Is there something else I have to do to prove I'm not one? What do I do next? I'm getting ready to leave and won't be back online until maybe later thise evening.

Decline reason:

A comparison of edits makes it look very probable that this account is yet another sock puppet. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another denial of socking was expected. Ask me anything you want: I am the one who "engineered" this block. Diffs will be provided as needed... Doc9871 (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For now I am leaving the unblock request on hold in case the blocking admin would like to make a comment. However, in the light of edits I have now seen by various sockpuppets of SkagitRiverQueen, I am not inclined to unblock. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have now seen that the blocking admin has made a response, and I see no reason to keep this open any longer. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something I'm missing here? Like before I can tell you right now I'm not a sockpuppet. All I am is someone who has free time on my hands several times a week when I'm away from home. I was looking for something fun or interesting to do and thought Wikipedia might bea way to do that. I'm still not seeing what the problem was with my changes. Since I'm not invested in the site I really won't be bothered too much if I can't work here again but it would be nice to still do so. You all seem to be certain I'm someone I'm not and I hope you can reconsider anyway. Thx.