User talk:I do not exist/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, I do not exist/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --InShaneee 03:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! – ∅ (∅), 04:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

You do exist

E-Bod has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

No. You do exist.

Thanks for fixing my mistakes on Template:Uw-engvar and Template:Uw-engvar.

Your First edit makes you look like a new user, however you edit as if you have been with us for a long time. You blend in very well. I always hate that feeling when I do things and nobody simes to notice as if I Do not Exist. Your edit to the tempate I made lets me know I Exist and my coomment to you shluld let you know you Exist. Join The WikiWikiParty--E-Bod 21:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Yayyy! *hugs*

– ∅ (∅), 21:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Found Something you may like

This user does not exist. However, if this user begins to exist, seek shelter immediately.

Hope you like it.

Heh. Thanks. :D – ∅ (∅), 23:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Haha I made that, nice to see how many people have used it so far. :) Mwhorn 22:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

"I do not exist"...

...when translated in Greek ("δεν υπάρχω" - "dhén ypárcho") means literally the same. Metaphorically though, it can be translated with a meaning like "I am too cool to exist"! Similarly when you tell someone "you do not exist" ("δεν υπάρχεις" - "dhén ypárchis"), it is an expression of exclaiming someone's actions (something like: "you're too good to be true!"). Since this is your username, I thought you should know! NikoSilver ^{(T) @ (C)} 12:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

PS: δεν υπάρχεις, indeed! :-)

Heheheheh. That's great. :D – ∅ (∅), 13:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Userboxes

Hi there. I like your new userboxes and I wanted to ask if you would mind if I added them to the userbox directory that I maintain. Thank you. —Mi r a 18:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Go ahead! – ∅ (∅), 18:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Done! And if you make any more in the same vein, feel free to add them in yourself. —Mi r a 18:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Added {{User:I do not exist/Userboxes/User married}} ^_^ – ∅ (∅), 19:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Eep, I think I forgot to save the page... – ∅ (∅), 19:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Saved! – ∅ (∅), 19:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much. —Mi r a 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello, person who doesn't exist.

— Nathan ^(talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

Hi! – ∅ (∅), 01:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Skunk

What is it that connects Gödel's incompleteness theorems to ruling, and Elasmosaurus to worshiping? And WTF does any of these have to do with a skunk? Is it surrealistic or am I too dumb to work it out? I am very curious, so kindly give me a hint!

If you do, I'll give you the answer to this:

A mother and her daughter (aged 51 and 17 respectively) are stranded on a deserted island. After one year a black person is shipwrecked on the same island and meets them. One more year later, the mother calls the black "father", and the daughter calls him "uncle". What happened during the last year?

Waiting for feedback... :NikoSilver: 12:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Mu. *smiles sagely* ;) – ∅ (∅), 12:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Λάθε βιώσας. As for my riddle: Σύν Αθηνά και χείρα κίνει. Was your answer Hapax legomenon? :NikoSilver: 13:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Nope... click the link :) – ∅ (∅), 14:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Besides, it's a completely gratuitous skunk™, anyway. – ∅ (∅), 14:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

PS: Φοβού τούς Δαναούς καί δώρα φέροντας!

*fears* ^_^ – ∅ (∅), 14:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Man you lost me completely!

:NikoSilver: 19:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

PS: BOO!!

PS2: I already knew what Wu/Mu means.

PS3: You may comment to this and that if you wish. I think it concerns you too.

Sorry Silver. I Guess I did look at this out of context. My apologies to Silver.--E-Bod 04:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Featured picture nomination

Bokeh FPC

It's perfectly fine to nominate images from commons for featuring here. In fact, since FP requires free images, chances are that a nom these days is going to be on commons. You should readd your nomination, it's a good picture. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:51, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

FPC

You can certainly nominate an article for FPC whether it's uploaded to Commons or Wikipedia. Just link to it like this: Image:Josefina with Bokeh.jpg.--Pharos 16:52, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

If you don't want to rewrite it, as an admin I can just restore Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Bokeh for you.--Pharos 17:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- Could you please? – ∅ (∅), 17:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  - Done.--Pharos 17:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
    - Thanks! – ∅ (∅), 17:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Removed!

And now the've removed my nomination because of some sort of licensing incompatibility. Actually the whole picture has been speedied. Damn, I'm so green. And so not a lawyer. >_< – ∅ (∅), 19:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

It's OK

I didn't know you were making fun of the idea, not me. Yeah, it would be kinda distracting, but I didn't know that 'cuz they don't distract me. Gang sta E B help me improve! 19:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Languages

Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Don't add any more silly languages please. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 18:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Mami Wata

Thanks for spotting that Mami Wata has some problems. I know that you claim on your user page to not know enough to contribute. However, what contribution requires isn't knowledge, it is research skills. If you have those, please use them on Mami Wata, cause it certainly needs it. GRBerry 16:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

I came to say the same thing. I've got a ton of notes on Mami Wata that I'm currently sorting through in an attempt to replace the 75% malarkey that's there now. I'm slowly getting back into the groove of Wiki'ing after moving overseas, though, so it's been slowgoing. Any help is much appreciated. — BrianSmithson 22:17, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately I have zero research skills, that's why I tagged the article so people who have them could improve it. ^_^ - ∅ (∅), 05:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Skunkeh!

Thanks for the compliment on my userpage! It might just be a furry thing, but I like pages with animal pictures too. Hyenaste ^(tell) 03:19, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Mama Zogbé

I wanted to let you know that I removed your prod notice and replaced it with a {{afd1}} at Mama Zogbé. I think the article has serious problems, but it's just borderline enough for me to not feel completely comfortable letting it fall by the wayside of {{prod}}. By all means, please stop by the deletion debate and put in your two cents. — BrianSmithson 08:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Edit summary!

(diff) (hist) . . m Furry fandom‎; 20:08 . . GreenReaper (Talk | contribs) (rv conclusion - original research)

I hereby award you the User:I do not exist best edit summary award of 2006 ^__^ - ∅ (∅),

Hehe, thanks. It seemed appropriate. :-) GreenReaper 23:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Fox kit

snerk... thanks for the comment on my userpage - that kit seems popular. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

CSD I1

Images such as Image:21york.JPG which are duplicates do not need to go through IFD. They fall under CSD I1: redundant images. You can use the template {{redundant image}} to nominate these under CSD. --MECU≈talk 00:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:AIV

No, they must be blocked if they continue vandalism, but AIV is for short-term listings only, and it is unlikely that this user will return soon. Academic Challenger 01:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

They might still come back, they were here just a few hours before, ridiculing their final warning. We'll see how things develop. :p - ∅ (∅), 01:55, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I vandalised you good

If you're homophobic again as you were in the Gay Fuel Discussion article you will be vandalised again, with more serious consequences. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.254.246 (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC).

You made me giggle. Note that the only consequences of your continuing to vandalize Wikipedia will be your being blocked and my getting a laugh at your expense. Have a nice day. - ∅ (∅), 18:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Note to self: WP:CIVIL and WP:DIV. - ∅ (∅), 17:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Related userboxen?

It would make sense to move a few or all of my boxes to go along with Mira's archive, as they are related. Could you set your bot to do this? - ∅ (∅), 21:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Done —METS501 (talk) 21:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! - ∅ (∅), 00:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Why did you rewrite the Ada Lovelace article?

Hi, on March 28 (yesterday), you rewrote the entire Ada Lovelace article, citing a "copyvio", AKA a copyright violation. What makes you think the article was lifted from elsewhere? Korny O'Near 13:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I didn't rewrite it, 195.194.178.151 did. See [1]. I reverted their rewrite, which was attributed to a Dr. Betty Toole. - ∅ (∅), 05:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that. Total confusion on my part. Korny O'Near 11:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thaks for the advice

Regarding the seven-man pyramid, your point on the use of "infamous" is well taken. Though it has certainly had the sad luck of being infamous at times, you are quite right - it is not infamous (and hopefully will never again regain that distinction).
So far as Layout and Standards goes, yah, total crap. Still working on those - very slow going.
Regards
Porterlu 17:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

*hangs head in shame* Sorry for the unfriendly edit summary ._. - ∅ (∅), 17:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I'll murder that stupid eukaryote if it kills me!

I was about to revert your speedy nomination, but I see you did it first. The article is begging for speedy, but sadly nothing quite fits! Flyguy649^talk_contribs 03:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah... that's too bad :-) Didn't remember A7 was only for people and organizations. :-p - ∅ (∅), 03:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

But someone speedied it under A7 anyways... whatever! Flyguy649^talk_contribs 19:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Mocking beliefs

Please look through our civility policy and in the future please refrain from mocking other people's belief systems as you did here[2]. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your opinion about a religion. If you don't think a belief system makes sense that is fine, you can even get a blog and post about it, but not on Wikipedia. ^(H) 14:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

I was merely stating my opinion that the article in question did not adhere to NPOV. It preaches a religion. - ∅ (∅), 02:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

No you were making a statement about what you thought of the belief in a belittling manner. That is different than "merely stating my opinion that the article in question did not adhere to NPOV". ^(H) 03:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, people believe in the silliest thing s. I can't be expected to take everything up to and including Time Cube seriously. My opinion on the Urantia book is that it is just as implausible as Time Cube, but not nearly as funny. Therefore it fails even as a joke religion. However, that is my opinion on the religion itself, and not on the article, and thus has no place on Wikipedia. I apologize. Allow me to rephrase: The article reads like a pamphlet for the Urantia religion. Wikipedia can be so funny sometimes. That better? - ∅ (∅), 03:46, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

No, that isn't better. For WP:NPOV deficiencies, please bring up on the discussion page the specific shortcomings you see, to assist with good faith improvement of the article. It isn't the intent of any article to be a pamphlet but to accurately and neutrally present a topic. If you withhold your specific criticisms it doesn't improve the article and really your comments aren't for anything. Wazronk 20:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

It does not matter what you think, this is not the place to promote it. Do not take this warning as an invitation to do it again. ^(H) 00:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I have been thoroughly... warned? - ∅ (∅), 00:42, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Removal of reference for dolphinarium article

I've reverted your removal of this reference in the dolphinarium article: Dolphin aggression in captivity The reason for this is simply that it is a good reference. ALL incidents on that website are sourced and thus there is no reason to believe this website wouldn't be a good reference, unless you can provide evidence otherwise. That it is hosted on geocities isn't relevant for it being a good reference or not. BabyNuke 19:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Okay - ∅ (∅), 22:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Template:Uw-copyright

I reverted your |left there. In fact we used to have it, but we soon figured it was breaking the layout on some pages. Usually on templates that are part of a series, it is best to first suggest the change since for consistency reason, that change should be done on all templates. Thanks! :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok. - ∅ (∅), 14:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Meta authentication

I hereby confirm that this is me. - ∅ (∅), 14:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

(And so's this.) - ∅ (∅), 15:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Bushy tails!

Meep! *fluffs I do not exist's tail in revenge for the swishing*! :) Bushytails 16:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

^_^ - ∅ (∅), 00:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Ariel

Thought I'd reverted that one, but I hadn't.... thanks :) Fourohfour 17:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Déjà vu

Thanks. Being bold seems to be what I do best... :) —tregoweth (talk) 23:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Furry

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:51, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Dilithium...

...is now ready for your non-controversial move. Thanks, Marasmusine 15:42, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks.

- ∅ (∅), 15:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

GPInternational says thanks

Thanks for cleaning up my article, The Dragon on the Bookshelf. I didn't know you had done it until I visited my History page.

Bay Valley Foods

Can you help me save Bay Valley Foods? the deletionists are going after me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BmikeSci (talk • contribs)

Removal of pop culture section

I noticed you have removed the "pop culture" trivia from delayed sleep phase syndrome. High five -- we'll clean that cruft out yet, one article at a time! —ptk✰fgs 19:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Zig Zag

Hi,

Oh dear, I hope I don't receive a deluge of negative feedback from the furries! As a cat-lover, I can't stand to have little fuzzy things mad at me! ;)

Seriously, I hope your effort to enforce the standard of WP:RS at that project succeeds. If I can be of assistance, just let me know. Best wishes, Xoloz 14:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Santa

If you don't exist, my 5 year old cousion would be pissed if you're Santa!

Excuse my french! :)--Angel David (talk•contribs) 18:02 9 September, 2007 (User Talker Contributor)

A Barnstar for you

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For turning this MfD into a less hostile environment by politely explaining the situation to a SPA. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk Page

I just made your job a little easier , I deleted "mess" (as you put it) of a talk page. good luck in your future administration deletions!!! {Mahmoudahmdeee 12:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)}

Your additions to User:Raul654/Raul's laws

Your additions to User:Raul654/Raul's laws concerning minorities are inappropriate. Besides being inaccurate, they also paint all minorities with a broad-brush. Perhaps there's some kernel of truth to your "laws", but certainly not in its current wording. Chaz ^Beckett 17:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I know I shouldn't WP:BITE, but I'm afraid you're not Raul654. This guy is. See also Rule 8 and Proposed Essjay's second law. I'd have explained more on the talk page, but another skunkie beat me to it. Happy editing. :-) - ∅ (∅), 07:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Good job!

When you apologized for stepping over the line, I thought that was a fine thing to do. Cheers. :) - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 03:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Dumbledore vote

Hi. All the arguing over where we should discuss Dumbledore's sexual orientation is proving useless. We need to work out just who is in favour of what and a vote seems the only way to go about it. I'm asking for your opinion since you had a say in the general argument. Thank you. asyndeton 10:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey. I think you may have misunderstood; no-one is suggesting we begin a new section, we are just suggesting which of the two, current, sections it should go in, or in both. You may want to ammend your comment as FallenAngelll is all for ignoring your vote. asyndeton 16:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

No, I didn't misunderstand the intent of the vote, I was just responding to certain people who were arguing for a subsection. - ∅ (∅), 17:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Geriatric1927

Shall we do a deal?

I'll remove his personal details from the page again. You can add them back, but only if you also include your real name, your home phone number, your home address, and instructions on the easiest way to get to your house so that some fruitcake off the internet can come over and kick shit out of you. It is for reason of that risk that Geriatric1927 opts out of disclosing his information online, and if you wish to rob him of his right to privacy and endanger him, I see it only as fair that you do the same to yourself. Agree, yes? --Unreadablecharacters 14:06, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Geriatric1927 has not asked for his information to be removed from his page, and Argent009 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whoever he is, does not have the authority to decide what goes and what doesn't go on this wiki. Until such a time as Mr. Oakley himself contacts Wikipedia, there's no reason why we shouldn't "disclose" information that the BBC has already "disclosed" and continues to disclose on their website. - ∅ (∅), 15:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Kwsn's Corollary to Geogre's Law

I think he means just a really short last name, like "Doe". Kwsn (Ni!) 14:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Finnish Swedish Heritage Day

Hello there, I do not exist! I just thought I'd pop in to wish you a most heartfelt and well deserved happy Finnish Swedish Heritage Day. I hope you enjoy it! Love, Yeanold Viskersenn 18:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Uh, thank you, I guess. :-D Happy Tajikistani Constitution Day! - ∅ (∅), 03:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

IfD process question

Hey there... I saw you agreed "with fire" on my first ever IfD nom! Thanks! :) Quick question: I am very familiar with the AfD process, and I expected IfD to be the same but it looks a little more lightweight. I'm guessing that's because of the huge number of orphaned/copyvio/otherwise unsuitable images you guys deal with. So... can anybody add their keep/delete !votes, just like an AfD? Most of the IfDs today are no-brainers... is it gratuitous for someone like me to go through saying, delete delete delete? Do only admins say delete/keep on IfDs?

Sorry to bug you with easy questions... Just wondering! And thanks again for concurring with my Very First Ever IfD! ;) --Jaysweet 16:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm not an admin either :-) Yeah, it would be sort of gratuitous as IFD defaults to deletion. I usually vote delete when I feel that someone else might disagree, though. Anyone can add their !vote, it's mostly the same as AFD. :-) - ∅ (∅), 16:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for. cheers! --Jaysweet 18:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Blanking?

What's up with this edit? I reverted it 'cause it seems like blanking... Gscshoyru 01:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

And I unreverted it because it looked like a bot was undoing a constructive edit by a real user that removed a lot of cruft and nonsense. - ∅ (∅), 02:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Right then, I shall re-revert myself. Thanks for clearing that up. Gscshoyru 02:08, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Jenna Haze

He... just... won't... stop... heh, that's quite some zeal. Vinh1313 20:52, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah... it's creepy. ._. - ∅ (∅), 21:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me out there. One day, I aspire to not exist as well. BrickMcLargeHuge (talk) 01:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Albus Dumbledore edits

I've responded to your clarification regarding the 'homosexuality and pedophilia' comment by DBachmann (dab), and have written him at his page to inquire about the matter further. I would suggest that if you do not find redress for his inappropriate comments either in the Dumbledore section or in his talk page, you should absolutely bring them to the attention of the Admin noticeboard/Incidents. Dab has had a few RfC as of late, and most of them tend to focus on these seemingly unguarded phrases. Do talk to Dab, as he may very well be willing to address your concerns, but be prepared to act appropriately if he does not choose to do so. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 12:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but I don't think I want to rock the boat. I'm just a little skunkie on a big wiki and I don't want to step on any toes... I probably shouldn't have posted my comment to begin with. - ∅ (∅), 12:19, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

No, you were right to post your umbrage at the posting, which I think consisted of Dab failing a little bit at the cleverness thing. And before you think you are too small to affect change or make a difference consider the African proverb: "If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping in a closed room with a mosquito." if you think something is wrong, ask. If you don't like the answer, ask someone else. It's an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, not just admins and long-time users. Keep in mind that everyone here atarted out where you are now. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 13:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

thank you! dab (𒁳) 13:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

"vandalism"

So you know, the user took you up on your suggestion to report you to AIV. [3] [4].—Random832 18:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh dear. I didn't think they'd actually do it. Sorry for causing spam on AIV. :-P - ∅ (∅), 18:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Fire cupping - an apology

Been a bit busy of late, so this is the first opportunity I've had to apologise for thinking you were a vandal (i.e. taking User:Signpostmaker at her word that you were a vandal and undoing your reverts. I did undo my reverts as soon as I realised that your edits were in good faith and probably valid. As I keep getting requests from her for me to intervene I have put a post on her talk page explaining what she should do (I'm no administrator, nor do I know anything about the topic - I just spend a lot of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism and reporting serial offenders).

I thought I should let you know that I have advised her on what I think should be the right course of action. It certainly feels right to me - I really should try and find out exactly what the policy is on disputes. If my suggestion to her was wrong, could you point me in the right direction as to what the policy is?

Thanks,

StephenBuxton (talk) 12:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)