User talk:Iainhutchinson

Hi Iain,

I see that you have inserted this into Edward John Dent for the second time after being reverted. First of all, if you are reverted on Wikipedia and don't agree, the accepted thing to do next is to open a discussion, see WP:BRD. Simply repeatedly reinserting your chosen text without discussion or explanation is not acceptable here and is called Edit warring.

The Swiss company's claim to be the original Dent's is disputed and inserting external links, especially to companies, in the body of the article does not comply with our Manual of Style. In any case, the company's own claims about itself cannot be considered reliable because they are not neutral.WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:RS.

Do you have any other sources to back up this claim? Spinning Spark 15:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hello Iainhutchinson. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Edward John Dent, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Spinning Spark 16:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]