User talk:Iamanexpertjah

My talkpage

December 2010[edit]

My apologies for the warning message as I completely misread the edit in question. The warning message has been removed and I apologize for reverting your edits. Alansohn (talk) 20:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Robinson[edit]

Please stop using the Tommy Robinson (English Defence League) article as a soapbox. We are interested in material from credible reliable sources, rather than the opinions of random contributors. A look at your editing history suggests to me that you aren't here to contribute constructively to Wikipedia - please prove me wrong. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tommy Robinson (English Defence League) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Entitled to your opinion"[edit]

Indeed you are; however, this is not a blog to publish it. Please have a look at WP:RS which explains what is and is not considered a reliable source. Youtube is not among them. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 18:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And while you are at it, we don't look too kindly on threats either, no matter how juvenile they are: [1] AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Robinson (English Defence League), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lucasoutloud (talk) 18:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OOOOOH, Im so scared !

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Iamanexpertjah. You have new messages at Lucasoutloud's talk page.
Message added 19:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Lucasoutloud (talk) 19:01, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]