User talk:Iamthemuffinman

I have blocked you briefly to give MisterShiney a chance to recover from your onslaught. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- An onslaught was it? It looked to me like your friend escalated the situation of his own accord. Iamthemuffinman 17:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Iamthemuffinman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You have blocked me on outragous and falsive grounds, if this block is not lifted at once I will escalate to Arbcom and make a full complaint about your competence as an administrator. I have never, not once ever made legal threats as you claim.

Decline reason:

First, your combative tone hardly augurs for some sort of flower garden blossoming beneath your feet following an unblock, especially given that the shortness of this block. Second, while it's OK, though not always well-advised, to remove others' comments from your own talk page, it is most definitely not OK to remove other users' comments from their own talk pages. So you stay in time-out. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This will now be escalated fully, and I will force my way through to an outcome that makes you both regret your foolish decisions today. You were given the chance to redress this massive act of abuse, you have thrown it away, I WILL ensure you pay. Iamthemuffinman 18:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

You need to seriously cool it, dude. Your assault on MisterShiney was laden with personal attacks and was way out of line. And your accusing him of treason?! Well, that's so outrageously stupid it almost defies comment. You are lucky you are only blocked for 24 hours - I would have given you an indef until you convinced us that your obnoxious behaviour was going to stop. Now go away and try to get a sense of proportion into your head! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would also have done an indefblock; and will seriously consider making it so in the face of any more threats or disruption.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the continued threats after the unblock request (which I did not see when I was making my comment) - "I WILL ensure you pay" is absolutely not acceptable, I have upped the block to indefinite. If the threats continue, I will revoke your ability to edit this talk page (unless someone else does first). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is. I wasn't aware that administrators were allowed to block people for things they haven't done, if this change in policy has gone through without my notice, then please tell me. It would have been appropriate to just change the reason, there would have been no problems. I feel it is absolutely right to make it known that one has been the victim of such abuses, and your random escalation to indefinite mere seconds after your first message does absolutely nothing to convince me to alter my stance. Iamthemuffinman 18:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your block is for your obnoxious personal attacks and for your continued threats on this page - I apologise for not changing the reason in the block log, but I am not able to do so now. This comes after a significant block history for previous personal attacks, and for a vandalism spree - and you have also had your account globally locked in the past. When you were previously unblocked, you were told "any further evidence of incivility or a battleground mentality will have you blocked again". You have massively violated that condition this time, and that is why you are indefinitely blocked. If you think there is any possibility of your ever being unblocked while you remain unconvinced of the need to alter your stance, then you'd better start rethinking pretty quickly. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nah I'll just get myself a new account, like the way I chose not to do the last time. Bye tosser.Iamthemuffinman 18:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

For your latest personal attacks (including in edit summaries) and for your threat to engage in socking, you have now lost the ability to edit this talk page. A number of us went out on a limb to get you back last time, but you have thrown our goodwill in our faces - we will not make the same mistake again. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Admins for your swift action. I was not aware that the conversation was being monitored and am pleased (if not slightly freaked out) at the swift responses as I was about to ask that this user be investigated/talked to for his edits to my talk page. I beleive that this user can, under guidance be a useful contributor. He did have a genuine question on my talk page which I tried to answer as best I could. But his behaviour had me at my wits end and on the verge of reporting him, but was unsure of the board it related to. For future reference what board should I report it to if I see this sort of thing happening again? MisterShiney ✉ 18:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the kind of personal attacks you were subject to, I think WP:ANI is the best place to request swift action. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Boing. I assume that should a user suddenly appear making similar attacks on my page I should make you all aware of it at once? MisterShiney ✉ 19:02, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, definitely - I have recorded my actions at WP:Ani#Iamthemuffinman to ask people to keep their eyes open. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iamthemuffinman, Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have also removed your ability to use the Wikipedia email system, as you have apparently used it to continue your abusive behaviour. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamthemuffinman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Possible interaction ban[edit]

Because Iamthemuffinman's talk page access is revoked, he will need to appeal it to the Arbitration Committee. In the review he will also need to promise he will never abuse multiple accounts again. If the block is lifted, I will post on AN about proposing an interaction ban between him and MisterShiney due to creating a hostile environment for that user. Hto9950 22:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]