User talk:Ian.thomson/Archive 3

Tidied up, old business is in the history. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Cool (aesthetic)

hello can you check the comment page for the cool aesthetic. no worries otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.54.18 (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Ian, I have come to address the issue which we do not have finished discussing. It is true that Japan may have some things I think are a bit messed up, like the manga for gays and even paedophiles, which their law completely permits, despite some concerns from the United Nations, and even more sickening, those freaking honorifics everyone says (they ALWAYS piss me off, yo). But, let's just use this as an example, what about the other AWESOME, FREAKING, SICK MANGA? (1 word: bleach.) I mean, could ANY1 seriusly respect some1 who DOESNT read manga, like, evry day? Anyway, we were talking about military might. Please, why don't you think a country with superior military strength, supreme nuclear force, and much greater technological advancements. I mean, don't you think a largely atheistic country who almost conquered the entire world is the biggest gun of them all? I mean, it could have crushed Germany right after taking over Asia, and from there, it would have been easy. Surely, Japan could easily start another world war right now and most likely triumph, no? Please, Ian, give me your input. TY. :) 21:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Krampus

My 4 year old sister at the time was actually at the orphanage when Krampus came and ran a rake party on those poor little girls. Why you don't believe me is ridiculous. My poor sister is scarred for life and any time she sees pictures of Krampus she shits her pants. Please allow for the truth to be told.

Jihad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.48.190 (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not about "truth", it only relays sourced information. Bring in a magazine or newspaper article and it may be added to the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Happiness

Ian, Happy New Year 2010 to you and your family. What is a very productive year for you, and for the administrators, and good fruits for the Wikipedia project. Observation.: Sorry for the delay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.205.161 (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Ian, I am in urgent need of their services. I need to remove "Luís Lombardi Leto" from "Talk: Luís Lombardi Leto" to "Article: Luís Lombardi Leto. Can you help me again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.22.210.162 (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Church of God's Grace

The article International Church of God's Grace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organisation

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:02, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion tagging

Hi, I noticed you tagged Umodel for deletion moments after the article was created using criteria A3. However, according to Special:NewPages, "articles should not be tagged for speedy deletion as having no context (CSD A1) or no content (CSD A3) moments after creation." I think that might be to give the creator a bit of time to add content to the page. Just letting you know :) JulieSpaulding (talk) 02:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Yo

Hey, Ian. Please, sorry if I like, sounded 2 extremist or anything. I was just a lil hyped up. Please, u offended? Srry...just trying to show my pride... Iotamikadoshi (talk) 21:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Ian, man, cmon: be cool, yo. i mean, serius, japan aint weak. hope westerners understand that, no matter to whom they believe in as their religion. I mean, is it more fo the satanist thing? Ian, i TOLD u our beliefs were different, but u seemed to be, like, in with devil worship, 2. now...I dunno...call urself a 'liberal'...sigh...srry, ian, if ur offended. just bored. know, however, that it is all part of my master plan that I have come to seek you out, to be ur friend. just answer me, then, r u at least INTERESTED in satanism? i mean, like u said on ur user page u liked TAOISTS...let's just both chill, forget about whatever bad comment I may (or may not) have made, and be friends again, kk? I mean, CMON, DUDE: U SEEM TO BE THE COOLEST PERSON AROUND HERE; PRIVATELY EMAILED A FEW OTHERS, BUT...U KNOW...some ppl r just...weird...plz, man? ty! :) :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Watchmen and Genovese

Go get your copy of Watchmen - issue 6, or chapter 6 of the trade.

Look at the page where Rorschach is explaining about where his mask came from.

You see that panel showing the newspaper frontpage? The one where the captions at the top say "Woman who ordered special dress. Kitty Genovese" ?

Look at the caption at the bottom of that same panel.

"I'm sure that was the woman's name."

Remember, Kovacs brought the fabric home in 1962. How sure are you that he's remembering that exact detail correctly after two years? Especially since he's using it as a rationale for becoming a hero? DS (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not interpret. As far as Rorschach knows, it was Kitty Genovese, and he was our only source of info. While it is questionable, we have nothing else. If there is another source that calls into question (say, a commentary) we could put "some question this, however." Ian.thomson (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

'Nationalism'

Ah...then what about RELIGION? if u dont like the things I say about japan, shouldnt anyone who shows a religious userbox (cough, cough) be not allowed to to do so either, as it implies a 'narrow' mindset? ian, though i see u like certain japnese films, i also see that u are a long way off from truly understanding the terrible beauty of this fierce people. :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

very well, thomson, but hear this, and hear this well: should u ever consider swaying to the path of true power (and FREEDOM!!!!), all u need do...is to give me a call. (Wink, wink! ;) ) May u one day realize how foolish u have been, my friend. cmon, I was once...of another belief, as well, but it now SICKENS me to even think of it. Now, I will use my new beliefs to bring myself true glory and might. Good day, Ian. You will one day understand why so many of us adhere to this faith, why so many have converted. May you then join us in eternal glory and might. :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Ian - why do you not join me? You are sure your Christianity can bring you the power you crave? I see you have exhibited a high interest in demons. If you accept, we may yet speak more of this; much have I planned for the glorious future of this sphere. Be reasonable, Ian, and do the RIGHT thing, my friend. :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

You do not know what I crave. My interest in demons is not for power, but because I am interested in mythology. How powerful is a belief that requires others? What separates such a belief from the crowd's mind control? I have placed my reasons on my userpage. I have my views of the future. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Ah...Fear not, Ian, we have methods of sufficiently sating the interests of those in mythology, I assure you. I shall try to be neutral, but honest: Not weak is the might of the Satanic churches. Haven't you heard of the Yorkshire Christian church that almost got burned down by Satanists, like, really recently? (dont think ive been to yorkshire, by the way, lived in london, yea, but dont think so far north, yo, london was...decent, i guess, but still) Remember: My own conversion to another belief was quite recent, and indeed not without some doubts, which I now find repulsive and a sign of great foolishness, if not weakness. More Satanists loathe Christians, even if they are 'Liberals', more than you can say, and they are under the protection of the LAW, yo, like even IF yall r christians, so.... Even in Russia, there is Satanism still; when I visited St. Petersburg and Moscow, I was pretty shocked. I do not lie when I say I have greater plans for humanity and this sphere upon which the human race dwells upon; enacting those plans, however, will be faced with considerable opposition. However, perhaps my efforts shall not be in vain, for stronger connections with certain world organizations do I have than most. I mean, seriously, more people should join the WINNING TEAM, u know? More of my views shall I speak of, if you promise to continue our friendship and at least TRY 2 consider offer, kk? ty. yay, :) :) :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 22:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I am quite, quite disappointed, Ian. Indeed, you are not the only one I have spoken to of these issues, though my aims reach far beyond merely your Wikipedia. You have truly chosen this Christianity over worship of the prince? You would go with your American society (yo, u r american, rite, not like, chinese or anything like that?) with anything, as long as you deem it to be 'socially' acceptable? Be wary, my friend, of Lucifer's power: I repeat, it has grown considerably through those whom walk in the shadows. I see you doubt my plans; such reactions are understandable. However, remember that the strong throughout history always rose from the weak. I, like you, am fascinated with this sphere's history, and I can recognize patterns with greater ease than most. For is that not what intelligence, essentially, is? Pattern recognition?

I will tell you a little bit more about myself, in order to enable you to fathom me, my choices, and my motives, a bit more clearer. I owed a debt to someone who treated me well, in an environment where I was mocked and scorned, cursed and threatened, all for stating my own personal beliefs. However, one day, I found out from this person of her own beliefs; I was somewhat...surprised, to say the least, but people there of other religions were cruel to me, mocking, hypocritical sardonic. It is because of this, of my gratitude for her, that I delve into this religion, despite its (unreasonable) criticisms from many, and it is why I have dedicated myself to a higher cause, and I now have met with others of...similar interests, let us say, and much study into Satanism itself have I done, and in areas less...reachable, shall we say, than Wikipedia. Now I know that what I was once before was laughable, and that now I indulge in a rich pleasure beyond all others. Think not that I am selfish, though, Ian: Soon, all around the world, even in those places whom resist this the firmest, all will succumb to this pleasure. Perhaps even you will then understand for what glorious destiny we have been planning. Is there no greater beauty than my wonderful goals, and even more so in their success? Worship whomever you please for now, Ian Thomson, merely remember that such concepts as 'good' and 'evil' are far more complicated than most can possible comprehend. Good day, :) Iotamikadoshi (talk) 18:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

If anyone is curious about the Andrew Mills stuff that was here

I just moved the stuff from a talk page created by an IP editor to the article space. I honestly don't care that the article was deleted. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion tagging

Hello, I just wanted to ask that instead of tagging an article simply as 'a7' if you could use the more specific a7 taggings such as 'band' 'person' etc? Thanks ^missrain(talk) 18:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

I'll try to remember to do that. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

PLEASE HELP AND SAVE OUR PAGE!

Hello! I have been creating a page for a band called FREIGHT TRAIN THEORY. It says im up for deletion. I have entered the importance of the band and really worked hard to meet the criteria needed for WIKIPEDIA. Can you please edit it so it is saved from the evil Delition monster!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustafunk (talk • contribs) 03:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Paul D. Richardson

Hi Ian. I noticed that the talk page hasn't been deleted. I'd like it to be deleted to hide my blushes! I was reading the speedy deletion page and followed some of the links. Would it be correct for me to put db-talk on the talk page? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Db-talk Fly by Night (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Gabriel Gordula

Why is this page going to be deleted - he is a rapper almost singed and thus deserves a page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by B smiz (talk • contribs) 21:15, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

eeekster deserves to have his own article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaponsdesigner (talk • contribs) 03:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

eeekster

read eeekster's talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weaponsdesigner (talk • contribs) 03:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tagging of User:Jmixx

Hi. I declined your tagging of User:Jmixx - since the user removed the CSD tag I don't think we can really say that they want deletion. Cheers, Olaf Davis (talk) 15:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Curiosity

I ask this, Ian Thomson: If you are residing in the territory known as North Carolina at the present, as you claim, have not you noticed any sign of Satanic worship or practice? If you are interested, again, I think it best if you contact me as soon as possible, for indeed, from what I have learned from various places, that it is there where the power of the prince is somewhat more centered. We will be able to help you in your life, and perhaps even on your road to true glory and beauty. Best wishes, your friend, Iotamikadoshi (talk) 23:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)