User talk:Ibrahimsabotaleb120

July 2019[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Help desk, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Moharram (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The page cannot be accepted into the encyclopedia as it stands as there are no references in support of statements in the article and therefore notability cannot be demonstrated. Please see that page for more information together with WP:RS for identifying reliable sources and WP:REFB for a guide to adding references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Moharram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahmed Moharram, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 13:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ibrahimsabotaleb120! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 13:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Prof. Ahmed Moharram[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Prof. Ahmed Moharram. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ahmed Moharram. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ahmed Moharram. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. VViking_TalkEdits 13:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of صلاح الدين التجاني[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on صلاح الدين التجاني, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://sheikhsalah.com/About.aspx. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 14:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Ahmed Moharram. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --VViking_TalkEdits 15:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have ownership issues with this article. You are also involved in an WP:edit war. Please revert your latest edits as you still do not have reliable sources and have not explained why re-added the information that is not sourced. --VViking_TalkEdits 17:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI Notice Board[edit]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 17:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question[edit]

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

In addition to the warning template I want to invite you to the article's talk page. I have listed the issues I have with the article and I have tried to engage in a conversation with you concerning those issues. Please stop trying to Own the article and start working on being a collaborative partner.--VViking_TalkEdits 15:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Moharram has been accepted[edit]

Ahmed Moharram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Moharram[edit]

Hi! Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Do you have any Arabic language magazine or newspaper articles, or books, that you can add to the Wikipedia article about Ahmed Moharram? I can only find a smattering in English, and I figure most sources are in Arabic. Like interviews with him and documentation about his work on those major landmarks. Thanks so much! Missvain (talk) 17:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Civil[edit]

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I noticed that you made a comment in an edit summary that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 20:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requirements=[edit]

Please note that you are required to make full disclosure of your conflict of interest regarding ACE Moharram Bakhoum. Undisclosed conflicts of interest can lead to loss of editing privileges. DS (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at ACE Moharram Bakhoum.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Despite being warned multiple times about conflict of interest, you have continued to make promotional spam edits to ACE Moharram Bakhoum. You will remain blocked until you declare any conflict of interest, and show that you understand our policies on spam and advertising. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:24, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me instantly! There is no conflict of interest between me and ACE Moharram Bakhoum. What you are doing is digital bullying User talk:CaptainEek. There are no ads on the page. I did not say for example this is the best consulting company in Egypt, and I did not mention any fees. All I did is mention the sectors that the company specializes at, and a sample of the completed projects. This is the minimal information that anyone who searches for this company wikipedia wants to know. Where the hell is the advertisement? Please before bullying and blocking me, see other pages of similar consultants worldwide. You either should bully them as well by removing their pages, or unblock me and publish the ACE page. Do not have double standards. I don't know if this is racism or what; but you definitely are not fair. Here is a list of pages that you should check (I don't know how to do hyperlinks here, so please just write their names on wikipedia and they will show up): Bechtel, PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABB Group, Halliburton. I dare you to delete these pages as you did to mine! Thanks Ibrahimsabotaleb120 (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC) User talk:Ibrahimsabotaleb120 12:25, 23 June 2020[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimsabotaleb120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me instantly! There is no conflict of interest between me and ACE Moharram Bakhoum. What you are doing is digital bullying User talk:CaptainEek. There are no ads on the page. I did not say for example this is the best consulting company in Egypt, and I did not mention any fees. All I did is mention the sectors that the company specializes at, and a sample of the completed projects. This is the minimal information that anyone who searches for this company wikipedia wants to know. Where the hell is the advertisement? Please before bullying and blocking me, see other pages of similar consultants worldwide. You either should bully them as well by removing their pages, or unblock me and publish the ACE page. Do not have double standards. I don't know if this is racism or what; but you definitely are not fair. Here is a list of pages that you should check (I don't know how to do hyperlinks here, so please just write their names on wikipedia and they will show up): Bechtel, PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABB Group, Halliburton. I dare you to delete these pages as you did to mine! Thanks Ibrahimsabotaleb120 (talk) 22:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC) User talk:Ibrahimsabotaleb120 12:25, 23 June 2020[reply]

Decline reason:

Personally attacking other editors is an automatic decline. If you will be appealing the block, leave the accusations of bullying and racism out of it. See WP:GAB, specifically WP:NOTTHEM. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimsabotaleb120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no conflict of interest between me and ACE Moharram Bakhoum. There are no ads on the page. I did not say for example this is the best consulting company in Egypt, and I did not mention any fees. All I did is mention the sectors that the company specializes at, and a sample of the completed projects. This is the minimal information that anyone who searches for this company wikipedia wants to know!. Where is the advertisement? Please see other pages of similar consultants worldwide such as Bechtel, PricewaterhouseCoopers, ABB Group, Halliburton. I was blocked UNFAIRLY

Decline reason:

You seem to misunderstand WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 01:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ibrahimsabotaleb120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There is no conflict of interest. I read the COI editing policy. I am not editing about myself, family, friends, clients, employers, or anyone whom I have financial and other relationships with. In the wikipedia page, just listed what is on the company's website (with NO promotional material whatsoever) and I cited everything. It is a well-known company in Egypt. Is this the way you treat content creators on wikipedia? I am doing this for free for the sake of knowledge transfer. This was the first page in a series of pages about similar companies in Egypt. But thanks to the false allegations of COI and false allegations of promotional material, I will not contribute to wikipedia anymore. By the way, whoever blocked me is the one who SHOULD present evidence of his/her allegations. He/she blocked me just because I reverted his/her edits. I would like to ask any fair reviewer to take a look at the ACE Moharram Bakhoum page and tell me if there is one single mistake in it! Everything is cited, and there is no promotional material. Thank you User talk:Ibrahimsabotaleb120 2 July 2020

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, since you say you won't be contributing anymore, there is no need to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ACE Moharram Bakhoum moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, ACE Moharram Bakhoum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]