User talk:Icetitan17

Image copyright problem with Image:LaceyChabert.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LaceyChabert.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use

You forgot to provide the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale for Image:Grouppic.jpg. Please go back and add it. Thanks. --Yamla 18:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rosa_Plage.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rosa_Plage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Smallville

It was already decided that a "music list" is not encyclopedic. It falls under WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE. A section about the music in Smallville is acceptable, but that would end up being on the main article. As for the allusions, if you don't have a source for them then they cannot be put there. It would be original research to make assumptions yourself, no matter how painfully obvious they are. As for images, we have criteria for those as well. If it is non-free, which all screencaptures are, then it has to have justification, and cannot simply be for eye candy. Just to let you know, I just received the Season Two and Three companions in the mail, so those pages will be looking like the first season here soon, and that means all those season two articles and the few season three episode articles will be merged and redirected, just like with season one.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I didn't give you a link to that discussion. That discussion took place at on the talk page of season one. User:Tone is an administrator that over saw the discussion, where it was agreed that listing music titles is unencyclopedic, because you have no explaination of what they did for the episode. As for everything else you said, never once did I claim anything was mine. If you have a source, provide it, if you don't then don't attempt to chastize me for cleaning up the articles. If you have issues with something, see an administrator. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not some fansite or TV guide or IMDb.com. If you cannot grasp that fact, then I'm sorry, but I cannot help you. Wikipedia is about quality, not quantity. BTW, I've written individual episode articles as well. I wrote Pilot (Smallville) and Aquaman (TV program) so do not begin to lecture me on what is what. Have a good day.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Obviously you missed this big section right above the one I just directed you to. BTW, your "other articles" argument, has not basis, as they are all being redirected as well. If you don't believe me, then go here. Also, you may want to familiarize yourself with this page, as most of the pages that follow the way you are wanting are in violation of this guideline. ALL articles must assert notability with reliable sources. If it cannot do that then it will get merged to a larger topic. You can view current discussions at Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review, and previous redirects from discussions by clicking the archives sections which will give you the discussions that took place for those episodes.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

About my undo

Sorry for undoing your Citation Needed link. It looked like a canada link or something, and I just wasn't thinking. Sorry!

Ertemplin (talk) 04:15, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I just saw "[[CA]]" when I clicked the "diff" button, and it looked out of place. How would you recommend I go about finding articles that have been vandalized? So far, I've just been going through the special:RecentChanges page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ertemplin (talk • contribs) 04:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

"Nongermane Amendments" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Nongermane Amendments and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 2 § Nongermane Amendments until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)