User talk:Ichatt4957

British Philatelic Association[edit]

The article British Philatelic Association has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Merope 16:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gooptu[edit]

I note that you added a mention of Fanindra Nath Gooptu to the article on Rai Bahadur, as supported by a link to... "collected works".

The problem is, that link which you provided? It says nothing about F.M. Gooptu being awarded Rai Bahadur. It mentions that M.K. Gandhi visited Gooptu's pencil factory in 1925, and... that's all. Nothing about Gooptu being awarded Rai Bahadur, or indeed anything other than that he existed and owned a pencil factory. As such, I've had to remove him from the list. If you can provide a better source, you can restore it. DS (talk) 13:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of India Opines[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on India Opines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with India Opines. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gobardhan Ash (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:NARTIST?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gobardhan Ash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He was a member of the important Calcutta Group in India - which led one of the branches of the modernist movement. Refer to Calcutta Group on wikipedia - he is already mentioned there and therefore easily passe WP:NARTIST Ichatt4957 (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The artist is already in Wikipedia under the Calcutta Group therefore easily passes WP:NARTIST. Some newspaper articles are as below, there are many. Economictimes is a majot newspaper in India

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/kolkata-art-gallery-aakriti-celebrates-famed-bengal-artist-gobardhan-ashs-105th-anniversary/articleshow/15275301.cms?from=mdr Ichatt4957 (talk) 18:07, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Works in the National Gallery of Modern Art , New Delhi. - note this is a government web site

https://indianculture.gov.in/museum-paintings/face-1995 Ichatt4957 (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ichatt4957! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rathin Maitra[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rathin Maitra, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rathin Maitra[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rathin Maitra, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gobardhan Ash has been accepted[edit]

Gobardhan Ash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 20:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]