User talk:Ichthyovenator/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Orphaned non-free image File:Walking with Monsters logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Walking with Monsters logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Ichthyovenator. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Roman emperors – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 27. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
šar māt Šumeri
Hi! I need your help about a piece of information in King of Sumer and Akkad. I read there: Despite both of the titles "King of Sumer" and "King of Akkad" having been used by the Akkadian kings, the title was not introduced in its combined form until the reign of the Neo-Sumerian king Ur-Nammu. I have strong doubts about this "king of Sumer". AFAIK, Sargon chose "king of Akkad", "king of Kish", "king of the land", "ensi of Enlil"; Rimush was "king of Kish" etc.
Mario Liverani, 2009, pp. 267-268, writes (poor translation is mine): "The extension of power beyond the city area was seen in the past as an aggregation of different local regalities (Sargon still boasts of having put together in his person the title of En of Uruk and that of Lugal of Kish); then, starting with Naram-Sin it was reorganized in a vision of a universal empire (king of the four parts); now, with Ur-Nammu it assumes a regional connotation" (now referring to "king of Sumer and Akkad").
The problem is also that King of Sumer redirects to Lugal, so that en.wiki gives no clear explanation of this "King of Sumer" title.
In our article I find also: As such, the royal titles used by Sargon and his Akkadian successors were King of Akkad (Akkadian: šar māt Akkadi) and King of Sumer (Akkadian: šar māt Šumeri). The source given for this information is page 72 of The Inscriptions of Nabopolassar, Amel-Marduk and Neriglissar, by Rocío Da Riva, a book concerning Neo-Babylonian kings. This page 72 mentions the title šar māt Šumeri u Akkadî, but not šar māt Šumeri alone.
What do you think? Thanks in advance and sorry for my Itanglish. :D --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 18:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. | |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Half Barnstar |
| For your frankly inspiring work on List of Roman emperors with Tintero and Avilich, please accept this barnstar. The work that the three of you invested in making that beautiful article is highly motivating. Fritzmann (message me) 22:42, 6 June 2022 (UTC) |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
|
Military history reviewers' award | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between April and June 2022. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 07:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Megalograptus scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Megalograptus article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 17, 2022. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 17, 2022, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.
For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.
We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you today for the article, "about a large and strange prehistoric sea scorpion"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:27, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
For anyone curious...
For anyone curious I spoke to Ichthyovenator earlier this year and he's doing fine—just off WP for a bit for personal reasons. Aza24 (talk) 23:17, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Mauro-Roman Kingdom for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mauro-Roman Kingdom (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.NotBartEhrman (talk) 11:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Final works
Hello my friend, hope you're doing well in your life.
I once basically promised you I'd work on Pruemopterus and co-nominate it to GA with you, unfortunately after three years I can reliably say I am not going to be able to deliver on this. Back in the day Wikipedia was my only way of realistically doing meaningul, high-effort projects on the Internet, nowadays though I'd like to move on, keep this hobby more casual and finish all the high-effort projects in Wikipedia I've been dragging on for years, including this one. My motivation for eurypterid topics is non-existent anymore and it appears you had also lost interest. Still since I basically blocked for three years the GA nomination on the article you worked on I've decided to nominate it. I will give you the merit and add it on your userpage once it's promoted as it's the page you worked on, hope you don't mind. I think I will also do this with Angustidontus, I remember asking you if you'd nominate it and you said you would once there was a life restoration, and someone made one.
I do this out of respect to you, I pretty much learned researching and editing properly by copying your edits, it was also fun working on eurypterids with you even though it was always an overwhelming mission and our articles are now unfortunately becoming outdated as new papers appear. Would be cool to hear again from you. Regards, Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 18:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Please return!
I keep coming across your work and discussions due to my interest in Roman-Byzantine history. I believe Wikipedia -- I mean, the internet -- is at a loss that you are not longer contributing. I do hope you return and can continue your great work one day. Biz (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pruemopterus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pruemopterus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pruemopterus
The article Pruemopterus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pruemopterus and Talk:Pruemopterus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 01:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pruemopterus
The article Pruemopterus you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Pruemopterus for comments about the article, and Talk:Pruemopterus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 03:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)