User talk:Imeldific

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Imeldific, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Imeldific!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure
This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Imeldific! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 06:16, Thursday, July 9, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

July 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Imelda Marcos has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Imelda Marcos was changed by Imeldific (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853647 on 2015-07-29T00:44:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of Borg 03:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imelda Marcos[edit]

Hello Imeldific,
I am disappointed that not only have you again edited without any edit summary, but you have reverted [1] a perfectly legitimate edit I made [2] to the Imelda Marcos page. You could also have informed of why you did this on my talk page, though an edit summary is preferred (both is of course even better!).
• You may need to look at the WP:manual of style (WP:MOS) at WP:SURNAME where you will find that as this is an encyclopaedia we do not refer to persons by their first name, in most cases. Therefore the page should not refer to Imelda Marcos as 'Imelda' throughout the entire page. It starts to sound like a promotional 'Fan' page if we do that. Referring to the person by their surname is normal practise, except where she and her husband are both being mentioned, and then their first names are used to prevent confusion about which 'Marcos' is being refereed to.
• See also WP:Ownership. Your username suggests the possibility of a WP:Conflict of interest (WP:COI).

I am also aware of your request to move the page to Imelda. 220 of Borg 03:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Imelda Marcos, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
exclamation mark  Related edits are here, where you have totally removed other editors comments without giving any reason or even an edit summary for doing so. 220 of Borg 05:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imeldific, you should not be changing the importance level for WikiProjects listed at Talk:Imelda Marcos. It is up for each WikiProject to determine how important an article is for that particular project. Originally, the Fashion WikiProject listed the article at Mid importance; you have changed this twice, first to High and now to Top. I am restoring it to Mid; please do not edit this again. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:14, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imelda Marcos[edit]

You removed any descriptions which has sources. Your violent behavior is the very Vandalism.--Y.haruo (talk) 04:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:19, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imelda Marcos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Imelda Marcos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Bling Ring|url=http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/05/13/bling-ring|publisher=''The New Yorker]]''|accessdate=March 6, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=5 Shopping Sprees So Wild, They Made
  • 04/5-shopping-sprees-so-wild-they-made-history.html#|work=Presidential Decree No. 1886|publisher=''[[New York Magazine]''|accessdate=March 6, 2016}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos[edit]

The article Imelda Marcos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Imelda Marcos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imelda Marcos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Imelda Marcos[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

conjugal dictatorship listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Conjugal dictatorship. Since you had some involvement with the conjugal dictatorship redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 70.51.46.39 (talk) 06:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imelda (criminal) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Imelda (criminal). Since you had some involvement with the Imelda (criminal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alsee (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Conjugal dictatorship[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Conjugal dictatorship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Imelda Marcos[edit]

I have included the content that she was a "kleptocrat" with the required citation. Why are you removing reliably sourced content from an article?

Your name and edit history suggest that you are a single purpose account with a conflict of interest.

Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Spacecowboy420. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Imelda Marcos has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following your ANI reports regarding my conduct, I thought it would be best to contact you here, to try and clear the air and explain what I consider the problem to be.

1. Your ANI reports seemed to be an act of revenge, because you didn't like me removing your content. That's ok with me this time, but the next time you have a content dispute with someone, it's a far better idea to discuss the content, rather than looking for revenge. 2. Your content seems to be unsourced and giving undue positive weight to Imelda Marcos. It doesn't matter what your personal opinion of her is, we always try to make a fair and balanced article. Unfortunately for the entire Marcos clan, the overwhelming opinion on reliable sources is rather negative, so that is what the article reflects. 3. Single purpose account - ie. you are on wikipedia to just edit one article, or one group of closely related articles. Because of you username and the fact that you focus only on Imelda Marcos related articles, people automatically are skeptical of your edits. I suggest that it might be a good idea to change your user name into something that is related to Imelda Marcos, and try to stay away from her articles. There are millions of articles available to edit on wikipedia, why not choose one that you don't have an emotional or personal connection with?

Feel free to discuss any of the above three points. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The edits were sourced.

She was reelected. "Bongbong Marcos, Imelda and family pray for 'poll integrity'". Philippine Daily Inquirer. May 15, 2016. Retrieved May 26, 2016.
"Imelda, Imee poised for re-election in Ilocos Norte". ABS-CBN News. May 9, 2016. Retrieved May 26, 2016.
"The $10bn question: what happened to the Marcos millions?". The Guardian. May 7, 2016. Retrieved May 25, 2016. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
Productions in the American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco and the Seattle Repertory Theater were held during the 2016-17 season."Here Lies Love to Play West Coast's A.C.T." Playbill. April 15, 2016. Retrieved May 25, 2016.
"Here Lies Love to Play Seattle Rep". Playbill. April 25, 2016. Retrieved May 25, 2016.

Imeldific (talk) 08:55, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Imeldific reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: ). Thank you. Muffled Pocketed 22:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Imelda Marcos[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Imeldific reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pincrete (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Electoral history of Imelda Marcos for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electoral history of Imelda Marcos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electoral history of Imelda Marcos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pincrete (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Imelda Marcos.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed 10:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is just to let you know that you are, in my opinion, over using the 'thanks' button in relation to me, and it is verging on harassment. If you 'thank' me once more where I consider it unsuitable, I will request Administrator intervention. Many thanks, Muffled Pocketed 16:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from the Peanut Gallery[edit]

Hi, Imeldific. I would suggest you slow your roll on Imelda Marcos and only make edits directly suggested by the FA reviewers. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Imeldific. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GAR[edit]

Imelda Marcos, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —howcheng {chat} 03:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Can you explain why you blanked the Imelda Marcos article? 86.187.167.46 (talk) 19:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:23prootie per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/23prootie. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 19:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unban/unblock request of Shwcz. Imeldific (talk) 23:28, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Imeldific&oldid=1167302259"