User talk:Iminabox

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Mrt3366. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fun because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 16:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carbon monoxide with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 00:47, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fun. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:06, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spinning Spark 13:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]