User talk:Impaige70

Whack!

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Information is not inaccurate if it has a reliable source behind it. Stop removing sourced info before you start racking up actual warnings (or even a ban). Also remember that your repeated reverts may end up violating the Three Revert Rule if you end up doing too many within 24 hours. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ 18:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mesa Police Department, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mesa Police Department, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Mesa_Police_Department.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Impaige70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I apologize, I was intending to add further context and information to the page. I have read over all of the policies and guidelines and will use edit appropriately in the futureImpaige70 (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am very certain you have an undeclared conflict of interest and count as a paid editor. See WP:COI and WP:PAID. Your edits were inappropriate and it's extremely unlikely you'll be unblocked to edit Mesa Police Department. If you wish to write about a different subject area, convince us you understand why your edits were inappropriate and tell us what you plan to write about instead. Yamla (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.