User talk:In ictu oculi/Archive 2022

.

Blonde tennis lady?[edit]

I didn't get the reference. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh the celebrated case of the one East European BLP on Wikipedia bravely targeted for Anglicization by a little band of valiant defenders of English Wikipedia. Remove her shameful accent aigu. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have no idea why Phryné was moved. But IF moved, please clean up after it, especially in templates. Or should it be moved back? I changed the composer's template. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When I created the article I wasn't aware that the accented spelling was so often used in English books for the courtesan herself. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Music without beats?[edit]

Hi In ictu oculi,

I looked up BI (the disambiguation page)) and found the table of contents on the right. I think this is a good solution and indicates a free spirit. Then I searched the history to find who was so smart and free. That's how I came upon your name and user page. There I saw that you have done a lot in music too.

This led me to the idea that, maybe, you could give me a hint.
I (try to) enjoy music via internet radio.

As for voices: I love beautiful voices like Elvis (in his best time, that is: when he was young) and Vicky Leandros (in her teens and twenties) or "Plava Laguna" in the film "The Fifths Element"; and I prefer few instruments, not big orchestras, e.g. pan flute, violine, clarinette, saxophone and trombone. I just realized: they are the ones which can start gentle.

As for drums: I love them when they happen to be from natural instruments which are big and have a solid bottom (not this western military style sound), and are recorded with microphones (not electr(on)ic pick ups) (minimum one meter away), then their sound is astounding enthusiasing, even more when their cases are thick wooden. But I hate the beats in modern music especially from snare drums (as they are used since Rock'n Roll was invented - after the Hawaiian music - and musicians started to use these "rock'n roll" drum kits). I hate such beats especialy when they are louder than the rest of the music, which just spoils the complete song -- for me, even if it was played and recorded analog. However, I love the snares in "Bolero". But I even more disgust beats which are artificial (that is: with a digitally made rectangle ascent).

Do you know of music stiles which do not have (artificial) beats in them? Sometimes I listen to the internet radio station "Cheap music" which features Music from the US from the 20s to the 50s, but these are not all enjoyable to me. I also tried two Irish music channels but constantly the same type of fiddle or singing is just too much. I once enjoyed the bouzouki in a film of the 1970s where the bouzouki was played light and gentle, so I tried a Greek channel, but almost all their bouzouki was played hard to the max and with the microphone much too close to the strings (I suppose). Plus most Greek female singers's voices sound like very old women and the men much too rough.

So, a hint or two out of your big chest of experience would be very apreciated.
I would also apreciate a ping, Steue (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imagínate (Menudo album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imagínate (Menudo album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beatrice Cenci (opera), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siegfried Lorenz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imagínate (Menudo album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imagínate (Menudo album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Gents (Swedish band)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gents (Swedish band). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 10#Gents (Swedish band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Lennart97 (talk) 00:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard Barbary for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Barbary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Barbary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sonofstar (talk) 12:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leslie Butler (musician) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leslie Butler (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leslie Butler (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

jp×g 02:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trumpeter[edit]

I suggest looking again at the issues for the RM at Talk:Trumpeter (bird). I think your comment may have been a little confused. The article that has been suggested to be moved is not about a pigeon. — BarrelProof (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Valle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese diacritics in The New York Times[edit]

Given your previous participation in discussions here about diacritics, you may be interested in a blog post I wrote briefly summarizing the 2011–2013 English Wikipedia diacritical mark conflict on the occasion of The New York Times appearing to relent and start using Vietnamese diacritics for seemingly the first time ever. [1] It's just one online-only op-ed so far, so nothing to reopen an RfC about on its own, but hopefully it brightens your day as much as it did mine. Maybe it's the start of something big. Also, I updated WP:DGUIDE to acknowledge the recent acceptance of diacritics by the AP (of all things). Minh Nguyễn ^💬 17:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's very much a technical issue. en.wp had both the editors and software to do it, for free. I worked in publishing at the same time and we only used full font VN for one high-MOS series of travel books, because it helped readers and the cost was worth it, but that's (a) a free encyclopedia, and (b) quality books. Newspapers would need to have proofreaders standing by in 100 languages, it's just not practicable, or wasn't then. The "English names" contingent didn't understand that. And still don't, we've got one sore thumb Serbian tennis bio remaining on en.wp as a trophy for the "English names" lobby. Publishing has different rules for reference books vs time sensitive news publications. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:27, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Gospel of John (film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Gospel of John (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shadower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fleet shadower.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chữ khoa đẩu[edit]

The article Chữ khoa đẩu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Khoa đẩu" is the Vietnamese term for the Chinese tadpole script, claims about an ancient script with such name is solely from the self-proclaimed pseudohistorian Đỗ Văn Xuyền whose 2013 book have been completely refuted by Vietnamese scholars. The according article in the Vietnamese wiki has long been deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sgnpkd (talk) 22:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Query[edit]

Hi In ictu oculi, looking for your help on a matter. I recently substantially expanded Cataldo Amodei and found this edit from yourself adding a music edition to the article. I would presume the edition in question is this one but I'm wondering where you got the names of the composer included, or if you have any more information on the edition? Best - Aza24 (talk) 02:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"The Agent (2008 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Agent (2008 film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 19#The Agent (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hat. (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EQ.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Franco De Rosa[edit]

The article Franco De Rosa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Helen (let’s talk) 00:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?[edit]

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 20:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bride of Silence[edit]

The article Bride of Silence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Last Love (Vera Lynn song)[edit]

The article Last Love (Vera Lynn song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any indication this is a notable single by Lynn. No sources found on a search, and not suitable for a redirect as it isn't mentioned in the main Vera Lynn article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World of Music (Mary O'Hara album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World of Music (Mary O'Hara album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Red Sun.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Red Sun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Red Sun moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, The Red Sun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Waddles 🗩 🖉 17:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Girls Gone Wild (1929 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girls Gone Wild (1929 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Red Sun.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Red Sun.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lailah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lailah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lailah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eskimo–Aleut languages[edit]

What's going on here? Is there some reason the dash was not preferred? Dicklyon (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No idea sorry. dash as you prefer all good. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 20:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good eye[edit]

Damn, you clocked this guy almost two years ago. ferret banned them just now. Good eye! Axem Titanium (talk) 07:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malena disambig[edit]

Hello, thanks for these statistics: https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Malena%7CMal%C3%A8na_(film)%7CMal%C3%A9na_(singer) Don't you think that sudden surge in film page views reflects the fact that people Google the name singer and end up viewing the film page instead, as Google considers it to be the primary page for Malena? Why else would people suddenly start viewing the page of an old film? Best wishes, --Armatura (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Reyhan (Bulgarian singer)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Reyhan (Bulgarian singer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 30#Reyhan (Bulgarian singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Arved (talk) 10:06, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmad Soleimani Nia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmad Soleimani Nia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Soleimani Nia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Brayan ocaner (talk) 14:38, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franz Baur for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franz Baur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franz Baur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

asilvering (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Local church" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Local church and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13#Local church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Saul Eadweard Helias" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Saul Eadweard Helias and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Saul Eadweard Helias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leviathan in popular culture[edit]

The article Leviathan in popular culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikonmina (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't do this again. Sikonmina (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Making insinuations is annoying and WP:HARRASSMENT which is why i removed it. Would you please grow up? Sikonmina (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aion (Japanese band) albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Aion (Japanese band) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 17:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Difang Jiaohui" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Difang Jiaohui and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Difang Jiaohui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Difang jiaohui" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Difang jiaohui and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Difang jiaohui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George J. Fritschel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George J. Fritschel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George J. Fritschel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Wgullyn (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tell Me! (August & Telma song).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tell Me! (August & Telma song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious[edit]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC) Thanks Gerda In ictu oculi (talk) 20:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Reflections (Harlem band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Reflections (Harlem band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reflections (Harlem band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 07:39, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Reflections (New York band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Reflections (New York band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reflections (New York band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 07:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ABD dab page re-org[edit]

This is minor, but I don't understand what distinguishes the entries at the top of ABD#Acronyms and codes from the ones in ABD#Other uses. Llew Mawr (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a partial edit. Tried to improve it, but a mess. Abd is not an acronym. Maybe you can do better than me. Good luck In ictu oculi (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Herold[edit]

The article Ted Herold has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't appear to be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Fishermen[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Fishermen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Y.[edit]

This may be too far back for you to remember, but did you intend to point "Y." somewhere else? Cheers! BD2412 T 06:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No preference In ictu oculi (talk) 07:23, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beresteiska (Kyiv Metro), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 816 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manohar Lal Sharma[edit]

The article Manohar Lal Sharma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Coverage is all about his routine work. Notability of the controversial cases he's taken up does not transfer to the subject himself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hemantha (talk) 12:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12553 articles, as of 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve One Town, Vijayawada[edit]

Hello, In ictu oculi,

Thank you for creating One Town, Vijayawada.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hello. Your article One Town, Vijayawada, appears to not contain information indicating its notability. Please read WP:NGEO, and try to include information that mentions the subject specifically, and not in passing. Please also read WP:GNG for other insights on how an article is deemed notable. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 20:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. It appears it was not you who moved the article to main space. Please ignore the above message. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 21:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on![edit]

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Delhi Times (disambiguation)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Delhi Times (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Innsbruck Festival of Early Music productions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alceste and Alessandro De Marchi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Red Sun[edit]

Hello, In ictu oculi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Red Sun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

X District[edit]

With respect to disambiguation what do you make of the following districts when "District" in included or not?

Hastings District, about the one in New Zealand but the ones in East Sussex also has the long name "Hastings District"[2][3][4] (see the map)[5] (Alt Label-Hastings District). The one in New Zealand was formed in 1989 while the one in East Sussex was formed in 1888 and reconstituted in 1974 with the same boundaries. The one in England has 92,554 people (2020 estimate) compered with only 90,100 (2021 estimate) for New Zealand. The disambiguation guidelines for the Sussex one would be Borough of Hastings if it had a separate article from the town per WP:UKDISTRICTS but the alternative form "Borough of X" doesn't seem that common for non-metropolitan districts. Probably make "Hastings District" a DAB (or redirect back to Hastings (disambiguation)) with Hastings District, New Zealand and Borough of Hastings being covered by Hastings Borough Council as well as a See also to Port Macquarie-Hastings Council which is kind of the equivalent of a district. I don't think it should redirect back to the town in England though even though that currently deals with the district with borough status as there is probably a reasonable argument "Hastings District" more commonly refers to the NZ one.
- Hastings District Council, seems fine since Hastings Borough Council does generally seemed to be named as such and unlike the district the naming seems more fixed.
Birmingham District, about an area in Alabama, less sources seem to use "Birmingham District" but still[6][7][8], see also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 26#Birmingham. Perhaps make "Birmingham District" a DAB or redirect back to Birmingham (disambiguation).
Sandwell District, about a record label, same as Birmingham sources[9][10]. Perhaps make "Sandwell District" a DAB.
Westminster District, already moved and redirected to Westminster (disambiguation), formerly about a Canadian electoral district, less sources still but Vision of Britain still does.
Any others listed at User:Crouch, Swale/X District#Others
Stratford District, New Zealand, I think because the English one does have "on-Avon" the NZ one could take the base name.

Thoughts on which should be disambiguated? I'm pretty sure the 1st should. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings Borough Council now has a separate article though the district doesn't. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message[edit]

Hi In ictu oculi,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sin City (The Flying Burrito Brothers album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sin City (The Flying Burrito Brothers album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:25, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Red Sun[edit]

Hello, In ictu oculi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Red Sun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, In ictu oculi,

I'm not sure if you are still interested in this article you started in 2013. It was mistakenly moved to Draft space from main space which is why it became eligible for speedy deletion, CSD G13, after 6 months of inactivity. If you would like it restored, please make a request at WP:REFUND or ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:32, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Red Telephone (band)[edit]

The article The Red Telephone (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Mahāgaja · talk 08:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Denied (song)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Denied (song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 30#Denied (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- lomrjyo ^talk 23:35, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

NEXT (Chinese band)[edit]

I don't understand your comment at Talk:NEXT (Chinese band) about a UK clothing group. The proposal was NEXT (Chinese group), not Next (group). Can you please check that comment? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I've (South Korean group)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect I've (South Korean group) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 30#I've (South Korean group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 05:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simeon Hasida[edit]

Hello, In ictu oculi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simeon Hasida, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate comments during discussion[edit]

Do you seriously believe "I can't think of a single more disruptive and damaging thing to propose to make the encyclopedia a worse place" is a productive comment to make during a discussion? I would have hoped someone who's been around as long as you would refrain from such statements. Or is there a tenure that editors reach when they are free to stop assuming good faith? WPscatter ^t/_c 08:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thirteenth First Edit Day![edit]

Hey, In ictu oculi. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Happy First Edit Day, In ictu oculi, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

İskenderun / Alexandretta[edit]

I was just reading through the İskenderun talk page. Surprised to see that a proposed move section was mostly conducted by IPs and a very short-lived account. Also, there is a long contribution at Talk:İskenderun#Name which I agree with. The crunch question per Wikipedia:Article titles is what the English-language reliable sources use, and I have looked at them. They overwhelmingly use Alexandretta, including (for instance):

Majid Kadduri, The Alexandretta Dispute (1995)
Edward Weisband, The Sanjak of Alexandretta: a Case Study of Law and Power During the Inter-war Period, 1919-1939 (1966)
Matthew Hughes, Allenby and British Strategy in the Middle East, 1917-1919 (2013)
John Fisher, Curzon and British Imperialism in the Middle East, 1916-1919 - (2012)
Paul G. Halpern, The Naval War in the Mediterranean: 1914-1918 (2015)

The use of İskenderun in reliable sources seems to be overwhelmingly in the Turkish language. I am just wondering if you would look at this again and maybe we could agree on a proposal. Moonraker (talk) 01:19, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly oppose a proposal to go back in time 100 years. You do realise that we are in 2023? In ictu oculi (talk) 18:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 23:11, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] t including another ~6,000 redirects

[2] The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

[a]

[b]