User talk:IndianBio/Archive 34

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 30

←

Archive 32

→

Artists with the most number-ones on the U.S. Dance Club Songs chart

I really disagree with the tag. The whole point of the article is to document all of the facts, records and milestones each number-one by each singer has had. It's not my fault that that some songs, especially more recent ones, have more info on them than older songs where reporting wasn't so prolific. I recognise that there is a lot of info for Anti, but being one of only 4 albums to ever produce at least 6 number-ones, and the circumstances surrounding each of them which have garnered it, the album and Rihanna herself so many records and milestones, can't be helped. I can try trimming it down, but I won't remove crucial information. Furthermore, if someone has had 30 number-ones, there is bound to be info and thus more prose than someone who has had 14, so I don't agree with the "undue weight" part. — Calvin999 09:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Calvin, the whole point was to reduce the info as it was bordering on puffery now. Yes I understand Anti is one album to generate six number ones, but it currently has undue weightage in comparison to the whole article. Rihanna's records are set in stone for sure, what is not necessary is fluffing it up to make it a Billboard article. We do not need to go to such in-depth regarding every song from Anti that has reached number one. Rihanna will achieve further number ones as so will Madonna, Katy Perry, Beyonce etc the other artists listed here. Now hope you see the problem that we will be dealing with. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:57, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I don't see it as puffery, it's chart records per song (some don't even have any written, just that it was number-one). Anything written is paraphrased and condensed from Billboard. No I don't see the problem. Yes, they will achieve number-ones, but look at the infrequency. Rihanna has had 7 in the time Madonna has had one, which was 3 years ago. Mariah hasn't had any for 4 years, Beyonce the same. Janet doesn't chart anymore, Donna is dead. I can't help that Rihanna has had 30 before the age of 30 and so many records have been set with them, specifically with Anti, that's not undue weight, that's just stating the facts. I've shorted Rihanna's by 1200 characters, but I don't see how else I could trim it. The 2005-15 section is already tightly squeezed with 23 songs in three paragraphs. — Calvin999 10:07, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I can see many ways it can be tightened more. It is puffery if you go into that much detail about each and every song in the Anti para, details which are much more suited for the song articles themselves. The 2005-15 section is perfect as it is. I don't see any reason why the Anti para needs the undue weight. Madonna might not have charted since 2015 since she did not release anything. Rihanna has had several releases from the album. In terms of crystal gazing we very well know that such statistics change randomly, especially in the Dance Club Songs chart, where the turn over is huge and on a weekly basis. Its basically every man's prerogative to reach number one in this chart now. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I understand what you're saying, but because Anti now has 6 number-ones, it is bringing more info as a result. There is more info about that six songs than the other 24 combined (but that's partly because there is more reporting on number-ones now than even 5 years ago). I have left out some info, and I've removed all examples where I've stated who the remixers are, as well as specific dates and "for the chart issue dated" phrases to shorten the sentences. Rihanna's section as a whole is the same length as Madonna's (a lot of Madonna's have little to no chart stats, records, info etc) and Katy Perry's is pretty detailed too, again, because of so many consecutive number-ones and having multiple albums produce at least 5 number ones. If it wasn't titled Records with Anti and deliberately sub-sectioned, and was just a six paragraph section, would you have questioned it? Because Madonna's has always been that length but isn't sub-sectioned. I personally thought sub-sectioning it broke up the prose a bit and made it easier to navigate. — Calvin999 14:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Gaga

Do you think this is a good idea? Also I am happy that so far there are not major concerns in PR, although I do think I should invite more reviewers. – FrB.TG (talk) 09:50, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: I cannot recall exactly, but I think this is not allowed under some policy. We (me and Snuggums) had implemented it before also and was reverted by an admin. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Hanky Panky on Rebel Heart Tour

How are you IndianBio? I have a question regarding a performance on Rebel Heart Tour. Madonna performed Hanky Panky on Brisbane: watch here. Is there a way we can add this to the tour and song's articles using that vid as source? --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:59, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

No chrishm we cannot per reliable source policy. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit to the original song article The Lady Is a Tramp

The Bennett and Gaga version just needs to be listed in that article, the same way all the other versions are listed. This is an article about a song written 80 years ago and covered by dozens of performers in the decades since it was published. Why not create another whole article that is only about The Bennett and Gaga version? This song has been around for many decades and was recorded along the way by many top artists of their day. There is nothing wrong with all the text devoted to The Bennett and Gaga version, but it is in the wrong place in that article, which is about an original song written a long time ago.Dratman (talk) 06:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Chester Bennington

Sad to hear what happened to him, isn't it? Learning of this news the first thing in the morning was enough to ruin my day . --Kailash29792 (talk) 02:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

This is horrible Kailash29792, like really really horrible. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 05:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

re: shashaa tirupati page

hi IB, just noticed the various warnings received for the page on Shashaa Tirupati. didnt realize what went wrong. could you please elaborate. if this is about citations, do let me know exactly where youd require them, eg where shall i incorporate them in the discography? also, if you could restore the information last updated by me earlier last night, i could start citing sources on as many as i can. thanks. Itsallaboutthemusic (talk) 23:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

@Itsallaboutthemusic:, everywhere throughout the article you need to add citations from reliable sources using the {{cite web}}, {{cite news}}, {{cite magazine}} etc templates. And no I won't be restoring any unsourced information. It is upto you to first find reliable source and use the talk page of the article to let other editors decide if it can be added or not. You are inexperienced. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:50, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, IndianBio. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 13:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS:, read your mail and looks like no action would be required for now. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

I personally wouldn't be surprised if that changes over time. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Me too and I would keep an eye definitely. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Set List

You seem unhappy with people adding to pages. I added the set list for the All the Hits tour and you removed it twice, citing there is no source. In ten minutes I found 5 concert pages that have the set list with no source. The source is that people attend the concert and know the set list. Not sure why you're against the page being more detailed, but whatever. Kaish15 (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

@Kaish15: if any other page has no source associated with them for set list, then that is an editor's miss. That does not mean that we should be adding set lists without any reliable sources in any other articles. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring

You are allowed to remove talk page warnings, it simply documents that you have read them. Be assured that I will allow you no latitude on edit warring in future: I will block without any further notice should you do so again. You should know better. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 11:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

@DESiegel: you perfectly know what happened. So kindly take this lecture somewhere else, yes I know better. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Madonna songs

Hey Cedric, are you aware of any Madonna songs that would pass WP:NSONGS and do not have an article yet? I've been itching to write one for her lately and I have a few in mind, although I would like to see what you say first. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 01:50, 23 July 2017 (UTC).

"Mother and Father" from American Life since it was a dance chart hit, "Issac" from Confessions since it was part of a controversy with rabbis, "Messiah" from Rebel Heart has independent notability when she was recording it along with "Veni Vidi Vici" because of the career references, "Over and Over" from Like a Virgin was a promotional release in Italy and even charted. These are from the top of my head @Carbrera:. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Sounds great. I was also thinking "She's Not Me" because it charted in Finland, "I Love New York" since the Glee cover version charted, and "Behind Me" (the unreleased track) since some random artist released it on iTunes and it caused quite a stir before being removed a few days later – although I believe it is back in some countries. As long as I have you here, was "Love Spent" from MDNA released as a promotional single in Europe? I've seen a pretty realistic-looking CD single on several occasions for it on the internet, including on Ebay and Discogs. It looks pretty legit and it appears that Universal Music may have issued it, although I'm not certain. It also has a ISRC code of USUG11200450 – perhaps this will help. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 06:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC).

@Carbrera: yes "She's Not Me" I can agree with but not "I Love New York" since it was the cover version. "Behind Me" again, I don't know how much material can be obtained. "Love Spent" the one that you have seen was a promotional CD released by Universal from The MDNA Tour performance of the track at Ziggo Dome Amsterdam, plus two remixes. It can be included in the albums discography page but does not pass as independent article. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes; I didn't think of turning "Love Spent" into an article due to it not charting. I'll add "Love Spent" to the discography page as well. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 06:47, 23 July 2017 (UTC).

Just letting you know, I responded to your comments on my featured list candidate. I appreciated your input so thanks. Carbrera (talk) 05:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC).

When You Believe(song)

It has now more than 100 million views and is vevo certified. https://www.facebook.com/MariahCareyCommunity/posts/1960447210860367?comment_id=1960697424168679&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D https://fotpforums.com/topic/152401-when-you-believe-hits-100m-views-on-vevo/ can I put views now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Taylor Swift discography

Hi, I'm RugratsFan2003. Right now, I'm questioning your decision to revert my contribution to Taylor Swift discography. I believe that my contribution was a useful contribution. The reason why is from looking at these pages:
Tim McGraw discography
Faith Hill discography
Patty Loveless discography
George Jones singles discography
George Jones albums discography
The Oak Ridge Boys discography
Home Free (group)#Discography
Kenny Rogers discography
Dottie West singles discography
Dottie West albums discography
Jim Reeves discography
Deborah Allen discography
Cledus T. Judd#Discography
Buck Owens discography
Susan Raye discography
What all of these pages have in common are that the US Country positions are listed. It makes no sense that these other artists have US Country positions and Taylor Swift does not. I should also mention that I left a message in the talk page a week ago to make sure that the community would be okay with this, but no one commented back. If my contribution turns out not to be useful, I am retiring from this screwed place called Wikipedia. I've been blocked twice, because the community didn't give me time to learn from mistakes that I made. RugratsFan2003 (talk) 14:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

@RugratsFan2003:, all those are just hardcore country artists with limited presence in the US. Unlike Swift who has successfully moved into the Pop category now with Red and 1989. Her country output was once added but was later changed because it was deemed irrelevant to add a genre chart from which she has moved. Also, adding country charts for 3/4 nations is unnecessary and places undue importance on them. Discography should be globally represented for an artist and not more than 10 charts in total, each from one of the big markets for that artist. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

I understand now. I won't be retiring from Wikipedia anytime soon. Thank you, and have a nice day! RugratsFan2003 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cure (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Cure (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Cure (song)

The article The Cure (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Cure (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mz7 -- Mz7 (talk) 07:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Despacito - CAPIF Certification

CAPIF's official website doesn't have its certifications section anymore. Luis Fonsi did recieve an Argentine certification. See here, you can even see the "CAPIF" logo on the certification's right bottom corner if you zoom the image enough (I had to zoom it 300% to distinguish it). Brankestein (talk) 15:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

MDNA album cover

At one point you are saying that one should refrain from adding deluxe edition cover arts of the albums whereas whenever i try to add the standard edition cover of Madonna's MDNA album you quickly delete it. So please explain me KARANSUTTA (talk) 22:54, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @KARANSUTTA:, please note that the deluxe edition is the one which received multiple media coverage, thereby passing WP:NFCC. Hence it is kept and same as Rebel Heart. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:05, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

For List of songs recorded by Madonna becoming an FL, cheers! — Calvin999 08:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Woohoo! @Calvin999: chin chin! I hope thats a good cider lol. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

It would be a bit of a mammoth task, but would you like to work on List of songs recorded by Celine Dion? It could be a great list. — Calvin999 10:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Ooooh yes Calvin999 I would love to. Should we separate out the French and Canadian albums like her {{Celine Dion}} navbox? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Two tables, one article, or two articles? — Calvin999 10:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

We might wanna create the tables first and then see if we wanna split it or not. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

She's done other languages too hasn't she? Might be clear to have one list and write/colour code the language? And footnote the covers. — Calvin999 10:31, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I actually don't want to color code the language because English and French will take priority resulting in two distinct color blobs. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Oh yeah. There are multiple options for this. One article, with separate tables for English, French and other languages. Two articles, one for English, one for French. One article, one table. — Calvin999 10:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I think the third option is definitely the worst. In terms of editing as well as data gathering and updation. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

So one article, multiple tables, or two separate articles? I reckon even splitting it in one article could make it extremely long, and lots of citations. — Calvin999 11:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

As I said before, lets create the two tables (one for English, one for French and other languages), and then take a checkpoint. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure how many non English/French songs there are, but I reckon they could be included on both lists. I feel like the French one is the precedent as that is her native language. — Calvin999 11:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Yes I agree that the French takes precedence also due to the fact that there are 15 French albums compared to 11 English ones. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Okay cool :) — Calvin999 11:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I've started on it. I've made a list of the album with original recordings on them on the talk page. — Calvin999 14:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Congrats to you and Aaron on this. Wanted so badly to leave some comments at the FLC but somehow forgot about it. Anyhoo, best of luck to you both with the Dion list. – FrB.TG (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. — Calvin999 16:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Triple Crown

Wow thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I nominated you for this :) — Calvin999 00:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Awww @Calvin999:, thank you for this kindness. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I was surprised you didn't have any, so I had to go through and find your first DYK, GA and FA to submit. You can upgrade yourself here — Calvin999 08:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

The Immaculate Collection (video)

Hello. Those articles do exist, I believe. If not as an article, as section of an article. And I had changed the last track title to the one that is actually written on the back cover of the video. Johnnyboytoy (talk) 15:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I've just verified The Madonna Collection does not exist, but The Video Collection 93:99 does exist. Johnnyboytoy (talk) 15:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Johnyboytoy, I was referring to the former only. We do not need internal redirects for them as they are of no importance. The Video Collection of course we can link. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 03:50, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Google groups archive

You might find this amusing. Usenet archive on google groups set only for "Madonna" and before 1990/01/01. Posts beginning in 1985 from people using the internet back then :) --Jennica✿ / ^talk 05:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@Jennica: omg this is hillarious !!

—IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:16, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

The 1989 World Tour Live

I don't think it is necessary to create a significant article for 1989 Tour's concert film. I think it should include in The 1989 World Tour article. As a Participant of Taylor Swift project, What do you think?—Phamthuathienvan (talk) 10:13, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Phamthuathienvan: on the contrary we always create a separate article for a live album connected to a tour. Check the different live albums for the Madonna wikiproject. Swift's album needs the chart sections though. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

The thing is that I haven't seen this concert film appeared on any charts or was reviewed by music critics. Also, no sources (such as the press release from Swift's website or media like Billboard and Rolling Stone) mentioned it as a live album.Phamthuathienvan (talk) 08:32, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

@Phamthuathienvan:, if you say that there's no chart action or independent reviews, feel free to merge the content to The 1989 World Tour page since failing WP:NALBUMS. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Hits Daily Double

This is a dubious reference for charts and release dates, right? I've noticed it being added, didn't think it was viable, and am pretty sure I've noticed you reverting it at some point, but hope I'm not mistaken in doing so myself. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: HDD is extremely unreliable. They all estimate sales, and have no concrete information unlike Billboard which takes the information from Nielsen SoundScan. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

That's what I thought. While a user tried to insist otherwise here, I'm glad my instinct was right. Snuggums (talk / edits) 12:06, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Steps

Would you c/e the lead for me please? Anything you think needs changing/improving. — Calvin999 09:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Sure, sorry was not online. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks — Calvin999 00:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Calvin999: as requested I copyedited the lead. I am surprised that we do not have better images of this amazing group. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Yeah me too. — Calvin999 09:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Look What You Made Me Do

Hello @IndianBio: I don't think you read my edit summary. On iTunes the official single uses the album cover. I provided a link in my edit summary but here it is. Single cover (121.214.32.236 (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

No, the link is not from the album. Where are you getting that information? It's a "single" and it says it's a "single" on iTunes. Also, could you please discuss here instead of speaking via edit summaries? From what I know the talk page is the first form of communication when one has a dispute. Thanks. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 10:57, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

Here are two more sources that use the album cover as the single cover @IndianBio:. Google Play and Spotify. It's the same cover. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

No that was not an idiotic response, I'm trying to discuss this matter in a civil matter but you're turning it into a verbal war. What is your problem? (121.214.32.236 (talk) 11:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

I don't care if it's an idiotic response, I have reverted your edit. We can discuss the matter in a civil manner and if we come to a consensus that results in the image being removed we can then remove it. For now it can be kept until we reach a consensus. For your information, I have seen many other users say the exact same words to other users when another user makes a mistake when editing, so it's not idiotic. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

@IndianBio: Persistent vandalism? What are you on about? There are sources, why is it so hard to understand why the image has been included? You have not given me any reason why it's being removed. All you're doing is reverting my edits and making rude remarks. Could you tell me why it's being removed? Is Wikipedia not built on fact, so why is this happening? (121.214.32.236 (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

Those are not the single covers, and google play and spotify are unreliable as they take album covers. Take this disruption somewhere else and let me find out which sock you are ma dear. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:36, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet really? I'm a dynamic IP user. Is this how you treat IP users here on Wikipedia? I've seen you edit many pages (via edit summaries) before but I never knew that a well established user like yourself could stoop so low and say such things. You couldn't even give me a proper reason as to why it was constantly being removed, a kind user had to explain it to me despite themselves not being involved in the dispute. Out of the fours years I have been here on Wikipedia this is the first time I have come in contact with you and I must say it was not pleasant. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

Tsk tsk Reece. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality scale

Hi. May I ask, how do you grade articles according to quality scale? I saw that you rated Reputation (Taylor Swift album) as start-class when I feel that it should be future-class, as nobody knows anything about the album yet. What do you think? Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 12:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Nahnah, yes the article is currently start class since there is no future class nomination for Taylor Swift wikiproject. We can have future class in the album wikiproject tag as it supports it. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I see. Thanks for replying. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Gaga: Five Foot Two

Hello there! Quick question: would there be any way to include the Netflix synopsis on the page? I just thought since it was a small text blurb and it was attributed to them, it wouldn't be infringement. Also, what source would you think to be suitable? The page seems a little anemic without the synopsis; was hoping to flesh it out some more. SomethingToTellYou (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @SomethingToTellYou:, the only way we can is to paraphrase the text in our own words completely. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Number 1 to Infinity (residency show)

Is there any way of finding out the boxscores for Leg 3 and Leg 5? Archives weren't added for them. — Calvin999 20:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Calvin999: I don't know how, I do not subscribe to Billboard :( —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 03:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Do you know anyone who does? — Calvin999 08:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

The only one I knew was User:Ericorbit but not sure how active he is. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:54, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Ah okay, thanks — Calvin999 08:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Each Time You Break My Heart

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Each Time You Break My Heart you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Million Reasons

Hello! I'm just wondering how I can fix the "Million Reasons" article to provide the correct director information? it currently states that Ruth Hogben and Andrea Gelardin directed when Lady Gaga & Ryan Hunter Phillps did. I figured the director's official page would be enough, but I see it's considered advertising/promotion. However, the only sources of the director are from official web pages, as Gaga never officially acknowledged anyone involved. Ruth and Andrea have also never mentioned directing this video. I'm new to all this, so any help you could provide would be great. Thanks. Byalienmeans (talk) 02:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Byalienmeans it cannot be added unless third party reliable sources indicate Ryan Hunter Philips as director. And my personal search cannot find any reliable source listing Ryan as director. Seems like this stemmed from the director's own website which cannot be a third party reliable input. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Look What You Made Me Do

What do ya think of the song? Honestly the "new Taylor" kinda sucks; "Shake It Off" and "Blank Space" were so much better self-parody songs than this. Not sure why it's breaking records. What are your thoughts? – FrB.TG (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Upon listening to "...Ready for It?" I disagree with the "'new Taylor' kinda sucks". – FrB.TG (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey FrB.TG, LWYMMD I'm kinda ambivalent but RFI is amazing! on repeat! —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Doubt

What exactly does this picture fail? :O --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Each Time You Break My Heart

The article Each Time You Break My Heart you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Each Time You Break My Heart for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Million Reasons

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Million Reasons you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Million Reasons

The article Million Reasons you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Million Reasons for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

"Dope"

Hey! Just letting you know there have been some additions to Dope (Lady Gaga song) you may want to check are appropriate. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

GA reviews

Please respond to my reviews of your "Million Reasons" and "Each Time You Break My Heart" GANs, as there is almost a week passed. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Notice!

To any of my talk page stalkers, I'm sorry I'm totally bogged down with exams this week and hence any response and urgent interventions, review responses etc will be delayed. I shall resume editing activity normally from 9/17 onwards. So kindly bare with me. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Tears on the Dancefloor#Track listing

What isn't working here please? — Calvin999 10:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Done Calvin. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Haha, how simple. Thank you. — Calvin999 14:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)