User talk:Infamous Castle
July 2015[edit]
So, I suppose I should probably stop vandalizing due to the severe warning I've received, but I couldn't help but notice that when you reverted my "vandalism" (Which I feel is a harsh term for editing silly snippets into articles that no one will pay heed to) on the Steven Tyler talk page under religion, another user had simply edited in "don't know bra", which went unchanged, but my edit was the only one to be reverted. If you are going to reverse edits, I highly recommend reversing every vandalism post, as to avoid appearing to target one person.
Thank you, Parvenu Walrus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parvenu Walrus (talk • contribs) 03:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Just so we're clear, I didn't revert your changes at Talk:Steven_Tyler. Someone else did. Get your facts right. Infamous Castle (talk) 12:26, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
February 2013[edit]
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to International Organization for Migration: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Hi, placing warning templates on Talk page when reverting really helps in monitoring vandalism history of a given user/IP. Thanks! kashmiri 23:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll be sure to keep that in mind. Thanks. Infamous Castle (talk) 08:13, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Infamous Castle, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]
|
Hi Infamous Castle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Fix[edit]
You need to fix it Gobucks1389 (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Fix what? One of your edits at Acura MDX was irrelevant, and therefore was reverted. Infamous Castle (talk) 04:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Dt[edit]
The edit you reverted was in fact actually true as Donald Trump is a descendent of him Nagfag (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Infamous Castle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
July 2018[edit]
Slight changes to badly-sourced, race-baiting nonsense are considered "not constructive." But race-baiting is constructive. Way to go, this is why wiki is a leftist shithole with waning credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.101.99 (talk) 07:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Your 'edit' seems to paint the media in a bad light. Just because the media writes about the fear of MSG being linked to anti-asian sentiments doesn't necessarily imply that their intention is 'race-baiting'. Infamous Castle (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Infamous Castle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Possible Mistaken Warning[edit]
I believe the vandalism warning you issued me recently may have been in error. I am certain I did not make that edit, and no one living under my IP address would make such an edit. Is it possible you sent the warning to the wrong person?
Popcorn[edit]
This is Daltonsatom. This is the second time I've received a false complaint for vandalism even though I use my own account. Perhaps it has been hacked, but I don't know how to shut down my current account and create a new one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.82.164 (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)