User talk:Insurgent666

Welcome and introduction[edit]

Hi, Insurgent666. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 23:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.

Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.

Play in your user area. For example, create User:Insurgent666/test.

Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.

When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

-- Chzz ► 23:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Universal Declaration of Human Rights[edit]

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom and speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people. Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedom is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, so we would start to discuss about one by one of the articles not even politically but even socially.Insurgent666 (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article 1[edit]

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.Insurgent666 (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[edit]

" All human beings are born equal " and "should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood " these parts are written in quran too.Persian sky (talk) 02:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC) persian sky[reply]

But unfortunately “acting towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood” has been forgotten, not only for Muslims but even for all people in all parts of the world.Insurgent666 (talk) 16:58, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why do u think It's been forgotten? I think in societies u can still find people acting towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood but rarely ... but the point is they aren't equal in dignity and rights. Persian sky (talk) 02:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC) persian sky[reply]

OK, but which societies do u exactly mean? By the way about the point which u mentioned, according to the article we are BORN free and equal in dignity and rights. So it’s clear that after years people’s dignity will change.Insurgent666 (talk) 03:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your'e some how right but what about "acting towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood" ??? u can still find it in the world. this Article is against DISCRIMINATION which u can easily find in any society or group and it also reminds us EGALITARIANISM Persian sky (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)persian sky[reply]

Article 2[edit]

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this declaration, without disjunction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinions, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the country or territory to which a person belongs, trust, none-self governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.Insurgent666 (talk) 10:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article just like first one is against discrimination , And consists many points which I think has been forgotten in many countries Nowadays Negros have better life than many years ago , But still there are amount of problems for them I don’t know why just the difference of color let some people to forget all about this sentence “ we all are equal in rights “ And unfortunately we still have racism and Ethnocentrism all around the world People who ‘cause of their country or race think they’re master race and try to promote racism And now about sex , we all should believe that a man rights = a woman right And not only rights but also the social situation, in many third world countries women have no right to appear in social events a lot like Afghanistan or… And even in more improved countries like Iran , still there are problems and not just among whole society but even in a small group men think they’re the master gender In fact most of the problems comes from traditional beliefs Though many think Islam has limited women , but it’s not true at all. And about religion , in some of European countries Muslims are called terrorists and it’s not because of Islam , It’s because of Islamic countries who have destroyed European opinions about Islam and have shown Islam as a cruel religion , but we all know It’s not .

Persian sky (talk) 13:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)persian sky[reply]