User talk:Intalk

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nagma. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change/remove sourced content without consensus, which you need to gain in the article talk page. Discuss your points one at a time in the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

• The source information on the page mentioned above Nagma was derogatory and was not authentic as it was most probably copied from deadlinks. Therefore I removed it, however since you are not happy with my work, I will drop it.Intalk (talk) 10:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)