User talk:Interestingfax

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 07:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improving "Underneath A Harlem Moon"[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I saw on the books WikiProject that your article Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon had been declined, but I think this could be an excellent article. Based on the notability guidelines for books, a book is independently notable is it "has been the subject of two or more non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself." The Guardian article is definitely one such work, and it looks like there have been several reviews in other sources which could be the second, though I haven't been able to access those. Organizing the article around the book itself, and saying more about it as a book, can help make this notability clearer so the article will be accepted next time. I started some edits along that line but won't be able to finish them. I encourage you to continue working on the article, and would be happy to help if I can. You might find it useful to look at other biography articles like Daughters of the Samurai or The Black Count to think about what information to include. Good luck editing, and let me know if I can assist! ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 20:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Underneath a Harlem Moon (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tom (LT) was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As previous. Notability of the biography is not demonstrated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tom (LT) (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Interestingfax! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tom (LT) (talk) 01:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon[edit]

Hello, Interestingfax. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Underneath a Harlem Moon[edit]

Hello, Interestingfax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Underneath a Harlem Moon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Resentment (Victoria Beckham song), without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there are messages for you[edit]

Hi. Can you see your talk page? Please do not use technical moves for controversial RM proposals like this. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently not In ictu oculi (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Rosen[edit]

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I noticed that you added a couple of self-published books by Emma Rosen to 'further reading' sections of a few articles. Can I ask whether you have any connection to that author? If so, please review our guidance on editing with a conflict of interest - there are certain disclosure that you may need to make. I've removed the additions you made, because to me they didn't see necessary - what we don't want to do is turn our articles into massive lists of all of the pieces of literature on a particular subject, and these books didn't seem to me to stand out from the crowd of other similar works. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 09:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Making points[edit]

Whatever WP:POINT you are trying to make, being disruptive is not a good way to go about it. MrOllie (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very good way to get blocked. Is that what you're after? - MrOllie (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:43, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour. Interestingfax (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

April 2022[edit]

Hello Wikipedia: You are being monitored LIVE on a TV Show to prove just how PREDJUDICED you are. The show is running live worldwide on the Internet. You'll be pleased to hear, a legal expert is monitoring your behaviour.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.