User talk:Ipstenu/2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This archive page covers approximately the dates between January 2007 and December 2007.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying or summarizing the section you are replying to if necessary.

Tempest

Hello, I got your message, I am still new to this whole thing. I was wondering before changing any pages, if you thought, that Tempest (comics) page should be changed to Garth-Tempest or something, he was Aqualad and he deserves his own page of Garth/Tempest/Aqualad instead of sharing it with the first Tempest, and let him have his own page or part of the Doom Patrol's page. I just wanted to run things by you first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerklinge (talk • contribs)

We've had talk about Tempest before, but I think if you wanted to move it, bring it up on the talk page there first and see what people think. I'm not 100% sure why we kept it as Tempest, but I remember talking about it when Infinite Crisis was going on. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 00:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


Image:Jorjafox01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jorjafox01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 06:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciated that you kept your cool and asked for clarification on this issue. These things often aren't as clear as they should be. --Yamla 21:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

HSM Trivia

I see what you're trying to do, I see some of them are fancruft from the pop-up edition. But I looked through the article and didn't find a lot of the trivia that is semi-notable, mainly

  • "This was the Disney Channel's most successful movie at its time with 7.7 million viewers in its premiere broadcast. The record was beaten by The Cheetah Girls 2 (2006) (TV), which attracted 8.3 million viewers on its premiere night." as that is important to show its popularity,
  • "Charles Klapow, one of the choreographers for the movie, was also one of the basketball dancers." as not many people who work behind the scenes often appear in the actual movies,
  • "Zac Efron's singing voice was that of composer Drew Seeley, who was also considered for the role. Seeley sang the entirety of "Get'cha Head in the Game" as well as composing it. He also sang the Reprise of "What I've Been Looking For". Efron only truly sings the first four sentences of "Start of Something New", the first sentence of "Breaking Free", and during the scene on the balcony. The reason for this is because Efron's natural voice is too low for that of a tenor and the producers preferred a tenor to match the role." as it reveals that Efron wasn't really singing, and possibly these 2 if they can be worked into it
  • " Hannah Montana premiered the same week as HSM. In two promotional commercials Ashley, Vanessa, and Zac appeared on the HM set with Miley Cyrus, Mitchel Musso, Emily Osment, and Jason Earles from HM. There was even a dance-off between the two sets of cast members."
  • "The Song "We're All in This Together" was performed (lip-synched) by the entire cast of the 2006 New Year's Eve Sing-a-Long Bowl-a-Thon with Corbin and Ashley leading the way. The other solo parts were taken by Brenda Song and Dylan Sprouse."

Though some of it may need to be reworded to cut out some fancruft, but I think the 5 things show some insight into the movie. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

OK sorry, I didn't look on Efrons page for the part about his singing. The parts in the production section I dunno how I missed, and the reason I suggested the part about HM and the Bowl-a-thon was because it shows a different perspective (not sure if you're following I think im confusing myself) --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 02:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Award

Hey Ipstenu I have something for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
You made me laugh when I read your input on the Talk:Miley Cyrus page and you were talking about her religious orientation and you called her evasive after what you wrote! Simple yet hilarious! BarnStar Boy 23:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


I am BarnStar Boy (SupaSoldiers other account) I use this account to give out Barnstars only (Wiki-Legally)!

You are totally Welcome...I'm glad it helped your day! :^) BarnStar Boy 19:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry for calling your edit silliness. Crumbsucker 02:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

Yeah man I had the same problem. My page even 10 times vandalized and those edits keep me encouraging to revert vandalism. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ Walkie-talkie 17:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Bi Wonder Woman

I found a source, the DC Comics website which lists the publication schedule until the end of April. 5 Wonder Woman comics coming out between now and then. So no, it isn't bimonthly *g*. [1] --Stenun 04:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

52, Montoya, & Question

Just a suggestion, but I think the best way to handle it is to handle this is to keep potential "Montoya as Question" stuff on the Montoya article.

I made the same suggestion on the Question talk page almost a week ago.

— J Greb 02:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair point... I caught a half spoiler about Isis (my LCS doesn't get the books til Thursdays) and it looks like a chunk of the characters have a limited shelf life. But to be fair, the "still dead" list is leaning to the characters that first appeared in 52 by 5:3, as side from the cameo villain death-fest at Halloween. — J Greb 02:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

The Riches

Hi. I'm sorry about that revert, I had a mental block for a moment there and completely missed the fact that Izzard's character was Wayne, instead thinking it was the first mention of a new character. My apologies. Rockpocket 17:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Barnstar of Good Humor
If only people really did break out in song and dance during lunch... ([2]) Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 17:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Dick Grayson infobox image

You have recently commented on whether or not the image used in the infobox for Dick Grayson should be changed. An attempt is being made to see if a consensus has been reached. If you are still interested in this, please look in at the straw poll section of the articles talk page.

Thanks for your interest.

- J Greb 07:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

True enough... though I've got a feeling Net would disagree with you assessment of me "keeping cool". Especially in light of the last comment I left with his part of the thread. While he generally is doing things to try an improve articles, his methods invite the DBAD essay, especially with his tendency to immediately fall back on a variant of the Kettle argument. And that's without looking at some of the comments that wind up on his talk page with regard to his use of a VP bot. — J Greb 17:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
LOL...yet again with the ad hominem attacks J Greb? Now that fits your essay even better. Glad to see you are staying true to form. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 00:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Given that this was a discussion about the people AND the issue at large, I don't see how it's an attack. We were discussing you and your image reverts. Remember 'No Personal Attacks', eh, Net? You're as guilty as J Greb is, if anyone's guilty of anything, and I don't appreciate you dragging this over to my talk page. I was having a polite conversation with J Greb. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 00:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Well then you and I disagree...commenting on another editor in a disparaging manner...how exactly is it not an attack. If you did not appreciate my "dragging" "this" onto your talk page, then I suggest that you do not entertain the intial dialogue to begin with. If you wish to allow just attacks, then please show the courtesy to have an editor defend himself/herself. Because, quite frankly, the comments you allowed on it were, in fact, NOT polite. Thank you. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 22:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

It wasn't disparaging comments. It was a POV reflection of a situation between two editors. That's all. In fact, you were spoken of as a good editor, though sometimes we disagreed with your methods. Which was not intended as disparagement, but a statement of perceived fact. People are entitled to opinions. That you followed J Greb over here makes me Spock the Brow some. You really should take a break from him and move on. You're starting to look like you're obsessing. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 01:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Ipstenu, I simply would ask for the courtesy of not being referred to is such a manner. Of course it is your talk page and both you and J_Greb are allowed to say whatever you'd like on such forums. However, philosophically I disagree with your point of view relating to "consensus" when there isn't majority support. I do agree when there is an overwhelming shift towards one side of a course of action. However I am all for opening lines of discussion, albeit with a bit more courtesy than is presently being displayed. Regards.Netkinetic(t/c/@) 05:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

That's fair, insofar as it goes. However there has to a method by which editors can talk about other editors, to attempt to resolve issues without having to confront them head-on. Which ... is where J Greb and I were going with this. NPA intended, and I'm sorry if you felt that disagreeing with your methods was an attack. Again. They weren't meant that way. As for my views on 'consensus' you'll note I changed my POV on this :) I'm perfectly willing to accept change, when presented reasonably. I don't mind that you were being bold, but IMO once someone reverts and says 'Hey. wait, let's talk first' then you should be respectful and stop to talk before just saying 'Nope, sorry, I'm being Bold!' and changing it back. And that's where my issue with you remains. That's it. You have a problem with J Greb? Go to his talk page. Not mine. Thank you. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 13:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I thought we had come to a truce, and *still* you are violating WP:CIV. Kindly cease and desist as a courtesy. Regards. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 02:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

How best to phrase this ... I haven't violated WP:CIV. I haven't done anything 'wrong' except possibly hurt your feelings by talking about the fact that your spat with J Greb on my talk page was a turning point in my decision to take a step back from the Grayson image discussion. If you're asking me to never ever mention that disagreement again? No. I can't promise that. I still assume good faith with your edits, and as I have repeatedly said, I think you're a good editor. I just don't agree with your methods. And I don't have to. Going forward? I plan to keep editing, and if something relevant to this historical incident comes up, I may mention it. As I'm sure some people mention my attempt to move the homosexual interpretations of Batman off to it's own page was a bad idea, and how others slam me for mercilessly editing the Tanya Baxter page. It happens. We move on. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 03:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

"We move on". Well I have, yet your bringing up my particular name rather than the issue puzzles me. I can appreciate your discussing the issue of WP:BOLD etc, fair enough. However, I've pulled myself out of the dialogue aside from asking for some civility regarding a fellow user on the Grayson talk page. You brought my name up, not Doc, which held considerable restaint. So if "we move on" then please...let us. It really isn't that difficult for mature adults to do. Regards. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 03:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Doc mentioned people who use policy as an excuse, which I felt was what you had done, and what J Greb and I had tried to talk about peaceably before. It's not in violation of policy to do that. As Doc mentioned the subject, you became relevant from my perspective. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 03:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry about my side of this. I didn't feel "dragged" into anything. Something on that talk page prompted me to articulate a feeling that had been forming but I hadn't expressed it on Wikipedia before. I actually understand Netkinetic's feeling something like, "Hey, why's Doczilla bringing up something from two weeks ago?" It was from two weeks ago to you folks. It was new to me and, like I said, prompted a thought I needed to express. Somebody may not have noticed the part where I acknowledged that those of you in the debate had moved past that point (or noticed but it magnified the puzzlement over my bringing it up). I needed to comment on a Wikipedia issue, not a Dick Grayson issue, and felt (and feel) good for saying it. Doczilla 03:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply to Everyone about this whole CIV thing

I don't believe I ever 'attacked' Netkinetic. I don't think I even started this. I talked to J Greb about something we agreed on and were TRYING to figure out how to address. This didn't happen. Doczilla mentioned the same thing J Greb and I had (using policy as an excuse) and I said 'yeah, that's why I'm trying to stay out of the discussion and appealing for help'. In retrospect? I should have shut up since obviously Netkinetic's touchy about the topic. Which is understandable. When he followed me to Doczilla's page, and started it up again, I decided to ask someone I respected for help on how to handle it, since it feels out of my league. And it's getting bigger every day. Am I being incivil? Well ... now I probably am being a bit bitchy, but I feel chased around all night and like I can't ask ANYONE to discuss the behavior of Netkinetic (specifically using policy as an excuse) which has now become a minor case of wikistalking. It's not against policy to talk to people about an issue with the intention of addressing and resolving it, but it becomes impossible to do so when you are accused of a personal attack every time you mention it. And in that case, we all lose. Sucks to be us. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 04:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

You really shouldn't have to worry about getting pestered at a third party's talk page when you're just trying to get advice and thank people for their input. You've been trying to get input, and for seeking help you feel you've had accusations hurled at you. Shrug it off. You're doing fine. Your edit to the word "snarkfest" seems to have helped settle things down by showing a good faith effort on your part to get past this evening's crap. I think Netkinetic accepted that. Now, back to the issues... Doczilla 06:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Explanation & sources

You edited without explanation or giveing sources; when I reverted you re-reverted with a snippy edit summary in which you explained the edit and gave a source. Did you think that the first time I should have just known what you were doing and what the source was? Note also that a source given ain an edit summary isn't enough; the summary will disappear from view; other editors (and readers) need something more permanent. (You also reverted to a version that contained "Newtasks"...) --Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I've slapped my own wrist, too. Now back to vandal-fighting... --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Level headed 3rd party needed...

Hate to ask this of you... but I need someone with a level head to take a look at what's going on at Whizzer and it's talk page.

I'm asking because I'm seeing most of the same problems on a few other pages on my watchlist that I'm thinking of getting to. And I need someone to tell me if I'm coming at it the wrong way.

Thanks, - J Greb 08:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Just so you know where my head is at the moment you may want to read here and here. - J Greb 06:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Shrek 4

Should this article be placed for AfD? I'll move the development talk to Shrek (series). —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 21:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment

There's been a Request for Comment initiated at Talk:Whizzer#Request for comment over style and content issues between two versions of Whizzer, one by Tenebrae, the other by Asgardian.

You're a regular and diligent contributor to WikiProject Comics and to the Whizzer article, and so might be a knowledgeable and disinterested party who could add an informed opinion. --Tenebrae 13:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:And the weenie is

Sorry, If did anything wrong. TV com can pretty reliable sometimes but they get stuff wrong occassionally. And I haven't that Cory in the House promo with "The Juicer" yet. And alot of these inexperienced editors just love to add uncited info and crystal ballery. QuasyBoy 10:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah we'll wait and see. ;) QuasyBoy 10:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

You both have a point

I'm only going ahead just so that it's over with — and from the early returns, it looks like it'll be over soon! That's actually a relief since I didn't want this and was only acting out of what I felt was obligation.--Tenebrae 19:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Ipstenu, your support was removed from the RfA because at the time you made it the RfA was not live yet. We do not permit comments on the RfA until it has been transcluded to WP:RFA. You're free to make comments now if you like. --Durin 20:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

RE: Morrowulf

No idea. I had originally altered it just to see how long a bit of decently-done "vandalism" to a page could go undetected. Anyone who reverted to it did it without my knowlege or endorsement. Morrowulf 20:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Red Links

I know that red links are okay and have restored many of them myself. When Cody Cameron's name is linked it isn't red it is blue but it DOES NOT link to an article for him. It links to the article for the first Shrek film and that is meaningless when you click on Cody's name. MarnetteD | Talk 20:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your followup note. Thanks also to you for fixing the page for him. Whoever redirected it in the first place was only creating a confusion that was not necessary. I am glad that everything is cleared up and happy editing to you :-))!MarnetteD | Talk 20:43, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

MartinBot Warning

Your recent edit to List of King of the Hill episodes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

This was a legit edit and has been reported as a false positive. Sheesh. Just cleaning up episodes. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 15:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Category:Indian comic book publishers

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Indian comic book publishers. It is considered vandalism. If you think an article should be deleted, please use deletion process, in stead of blanking the page. Od Mishehu 07:50, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Did you not read my edit? Moved to Comic book publishing companies of India - I don't know how to rename a cat or move it, so I deleted the empty category as best I could. Not a vandal :) -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 13:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
To deal with this, follow the instructions under WP:CFD. Od Mishehu 04:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Episodes images

Why have you removed all the images from List of Mr Hell Show Episodes? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 08:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh right, how rubbish. Thanks for your reply --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 14:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

MartinBot Warning 2

Your recent edit to List of Only Fools and Horses episodes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Again? Damn it, I'm starting to hate this bot. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 16:19, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

quick question

hey, ive seen you contribute alot to high school musical, disney and such so i just wondered if you knew if drew seeley sings for zac in hsm2

i thought it was zac singing but im not sure... any help? thanks. Amstoakes 09:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Problem with your signature

Hi Ipstenu

I don't know whether it is your standard signature, but the one you used at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 27#Category:Category:Indian_comic_book_publishers was broken, and made the whole page go green. I have now corrected it on that page, but if this is your standard sig, please could you fix it?

The signature you used to create this effect was:

<font color="Green">'''[[User:Ipstenu|Ipstenu]]''' ''([[User talk:Ipstenu|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ipstenu|contribs]])''</font>

... and the corrected version (which created this result) is:

<span style="color:Green">'''[[User:Ipstenu|Ipstenu]]''' ''([[User talk:Ipstenu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ipstenu|contribs]])''</span>

Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

erv?

I noticed you put "erv" in your edit summary for one of your recent edits to High School Musical 2. Just curious, what does "erv" mean or stand for? Thanks. Nowayout203 02:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Oh ok, I thought it actually stood for something =) Thanks for clarifying! Nowayout203 02:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Batmanytb links

I'll keep checking those pages too so none of us risk losing track and getting ourselves a 3RR violation while reverting linkspam. Doczilla 20:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't understand. I found the site through Google. I've learned alot about the character from that site and yet I can't add a link? I saw the discussion on the main Batman article site and I am confused. why can Superman Database have a link and not batmanytb? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman/Batman#External_links

And what do I have to do? I'm trying to be helpful, this place doesn't give ALL the info. For Comics, Covers, summaries, ect.. those help. Ok, so it's a Fan site.. big deal, so is www.dcuguide.com, and what about this one: http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/egypt/235/ on the Huntress Page: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huntress_%28comics%29&curid=684877&diff=135152705&oldid=135076977#External_links, or this one: http://www.geocities.com/hollywood/set/6742/ There are many more all over this site, yet one of the best sites out there, that gives viweres details you delete? If batmanytb.com can't be listed, (which by the way I found on several pages it was listed as a resource for various articles) then NO fan site should be. only DCcomics.com because they are the ONLY official site out there.

I've checked the help page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_should_be_linked 

and here what what should be avoided:

Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a Featured article. Well.. I know on most, if not all the links I provided, they gave the viewer more information, more resources than the Wiki Article does.

Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. Didn't do that Links mainly intended to promote a website Well.. now this would be the ONLY one I could see used against the links I provided, cept for the fact they went with the article as you will see below

Links to sites that primarily exist to sell products or services. For example, instead of linking to a commercial bookstore site, use the "ISBN" linking format, giving readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources. Didn't do that


Links to sites with objectionable amounts of advertising. None

Links to sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content. Nope

Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that only work with a specific browser. Nope

Direct links to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) to view the relevant content, unless the article is about such rich media. If you do link to such material make a note of what application is required. No on this one too..

Links to search engine and aggregated results pages. No

Links to social networking sites (such as MySpace), discussion forums or USENET. Nope Links to blogs and personal web pages, except those written by a recognized authority. Not any of these either

Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. Not A Wiki, though I've seen DC Database listed and it's a Wiki...

Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked to from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked to an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep-linked. The links I provided was directly to the sections that went with the Article

I know there are other sections to the help, but when refering to link spam I think you guys, who know it all (not being smart, just stating that I realize you are supose to know more than I do when it comes to this) anyway.. you guys should look at the links I provided and see that it is not spam but a resource.

Now, if I need to go to every page and beg I will, but I would like to see all sites that aren't official removed and let someone plead their case. --Xphermg 04:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)


Sorry, I've been out of line. I should not have deleted anything. I did what you asked me to, I posted in the Talk pages and Doczilla said no because the site was advertising. Ok.. but so are most of the others. And yea, so far I only did those Batman sites. I just found a really cool and informative Flash site that I was going to add in there too, then this link stuff happened.

I'm just trying to be helpful. Really. So whats our next step? --Xphermg 18:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok.. that makes more sense then the advertising deal. Though alot of articles really do the same thing. I'll do more research when I want to add a link. Thank you for being so kind and not rude. --Xphermg 18:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Lists of episodes-clarification

My interpretation of your "page in a nutshell" banner is that lists of episodes should not contain dozens of screenshots, like one beside each episode. Can you confirm that this is the case, as I am about to get medieval on List of CSI: NY episodes. Editus Reloaded 18:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

CSI characters - dead or alive?

I have noticed that in List of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation characters and also your own user subpage draft of a minor characters list, you refer to Former Sheriff Brian Mobley as being dead. Is he? I can find no reference to his demise on an external source, so I'm applying the same logic as is applied to other minor characters who have not made a recent appearance: alive until proven dead. If you can find a reference, of course put it in the articles. Editus Reloaded 21:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I think he retired; the Mayor of Las Vegas has been shown in later eps, but it's not Brian Mobley. Editus Reloaded 06:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The guy who was killed in Cross Jurisdictions was the former Chief of Detectives for LVPD, a previously unseen character. Editus Reloaded 15:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Rude

he deletes any edits that you make. Idiot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.240.93 (talk)

A little present...

The Working Man Woman's Barnstar
For diving into WikiProject CSI with enthusiasm, grit and drive, especially sorting out the List of Characters/Cast issue. I swear it's only your name on the history... Editus Reloaded 19:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

re: To fix your user page...

Thank you very much! :D Darkson - BANG! 22:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Oops

Will do. I'll fix right now if you haven't already. Learn something new every day! --Tenebrae 15:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:BJ In House!

Ah, I see. I usually watch/am pretty up-to-date on kids' shows, but that's a new one on me. Thanks, and no prob about the AfD.--Ispy1981 20:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

My Bad

I guess were going with User:ZanessaYay's title version. QuasyBoy 14:08 19 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree with you, I'm cool with the way title is. ;) QuasyBoy 14:23 19 June 2007 (UTC)

mary

youre right but youre wrong also its definetly not from the word sorry. Im involved in another dispute right now and im not going to dispute this. We'll leave it till tommorrow when hopefully itll become clearer. Thanks once again.TheManWhoLaughs 20:52, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry man, long day, I know youre agreeing withj me i misworded my statement i meant thank you for helping me keep it out of the article that it was because she said sorry.TheManWhoLaughs 20:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Catwoman edit.

Max Shreck (Batman Returns). There. Shreck, not Shrek. It's legit, and avoids Arcayne's ridiculous attack of the CN tag. I've reverted it, because it's a good edit, not vandalism. You might owe him an apology. ThuranX 23:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Ipstenu, a good word

Ipstenu, I know I've stepped on your toes in the past, for which I do regret that this has occured. Although I have and will continue to make comments that challenge people to prove their ascertions and act in a cordial manner (something I myself struggle with online), I have truly worked the past few months on at least accepting consensus through the decision making process. I know it is to little to late...still best to say I respect your contributions and hope one day there is mutual accord. Regards. :) Netkinetic (t/c/@) 07:30, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Something I'd like feed back on...

I'm working on something with regard to Amphibian (comics), and potentially the rest of the related articles.

I've moved a copy of the article to User:J Greb/Pasteup while I'm working on it.

The upshot is, given the relatively short history of the characters, I'm trying to blend the PH and FCB into one section. Right now I've only gotten through the first character, but I'd like a few other editors to take a look and tell me if I'm onto something, blowing smoke, or somewhere in between.

Thanks, - J Greb 10:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Countdown crossover titles

I felt that putting the titles of DC comics that tied into the Countdown story was important as it is a crossover & every other crossover we have a list of comics, but I understand your point. It will be a lot of titles, but not every title will cross over into the series as of this week, Wonder Woman hasn't even tied into the series yet.

I'll just keep a personal list of tie-in issues as I have done with the rest of the crossovers.

Dvibert

Dick Grayson 2nd to Batman issue

Thank you for the link, Ipstenu. I've initated talk on the user talk page and then noticed that link to a previous discussion in the archives. We'll see how consensus sways the WP:NOR issue. Appreciate your informing me on the issue.Netkinetic (t/c/@) 02:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Question Authority

What I referring to was the predicament the Question was in at the time. The Question was being tortured by Dr. Moon in the episode "Question Authority", and stumbled upon the video of the Justice Lords Superman killing President Luthor, and was tortured by Dr. Moon to reveal information. Instead of revealing that Superman killed Luthor in an alternate reality, He told Dr. Moon a number of conspiracy theories which he knew. Now I don't know about you, but despite being a conspiracy theorist, these statements are ambiguous in terms of his beliefs. He may actually believe that everything he told Dr. Moon is true, but then he may also just be trying to be uncooperative. Just to let you know. Please let me me know if you disagree. Uglyguy2006


High School Musical 3

Would you take a look at High School Musical 3 when you have a chance. That article is receiving some heavy editing, some of which is difficult to tell whether it is legit. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 21:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Speedstersinspeedforce.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Speedstersinspeedforce.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

High School Musical 3

Here I am again. The High School Musical 3 article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 06:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ipstenu/2007&oldid=1053234089"