User talk:Irek Minnullin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Irek Minnullin, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

June 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich has been reverted.
Your edit here to Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://twitter.com/Garifullinl) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * From 1992 to 1994 appeared on TV as a presenter for channel "Tatarstan" (programs “Vasha semya” ("Your family", Ваша семья) and “Kakie my?” ("What are we?", Какие мы?),
  • of psychological and psychotherapeutic approaches to the problem of bribery and bribe-taking mania”(”Aktualnye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava” (“Current Problems in Economics and Law”), no. 4(24), 2012,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich[edit]

The article Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person doesn't meet the notability criteria. The article is written in self-promotional style in clear conflict of interest. Same article was deleted from Russian Wikipedia because of the same reasons, and its recreation is forbidden.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fedor Babkin (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please to support the publication of article about Ramil Garifullin on Wikipedia.[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garifullin_Ramil_Ramzievich Sorry for mistakes in English The article «Garifullin Ramil RamzIevich» has got in a contradictory situation, and had the following stages:1. After the publication of this article was edited by me in accordance with the requirements of administrators and users and was supported by the administrator (he removed the template modification). 2. After I started to post links to this article in Russian Wikipedia ancient my opponents Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin immediately began to remove these links, and there was a conflict (dialogue presents the Akim Dubrow on the website). 3.Fedor Babkin then immediately put the template for deletion of the article "Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich" in connection with the advertisement and previous deletion of this article in Russian Wikipedia. 4. You have deleted an article in connection with copying and copyright infringement. He appeared right after the discussion appeared remark about punishments Akim Dubrow rude and inadequate removal in Russian Wikipedia and the long-standing conflict Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin with participants, writing about Garifullin, and insults Akim Dubrow towards Garifullin. Although it was stated that there are seven days to fix the bugs. They look suspiciously was done quickly and without discussion. Why? Ramil Garifullin known personality in Russia thanks to extensive publications in the major media and a variety of books.Earlier article about Ramil Garifullina in Russian Wikipedia has been removed due to political motives, because of the publication of negative article about Edward Snowdon (in RBC)-This was proven when discussing article (Ramil Garifullin) in Russian Wikipedia. Article about Garifullin (Russian Wikipedia), which was in Russian Wikipedia four years has been deleted on the day of publication of the article about Snowden 16.07.2014. Information can be found in the discussion of removed Article. Duo Fedor Babkin -Akim Dubrow is a longtime opponents of Ramil Garifullin. Akim Dubrow repeatedly insulted Ramil Garifullina online, although he apologized for them. Publication of article about Ramil Garifullina - a political issue. By importance in the Russian Wikipedia Ramil Garifullin adequate, but was removed from - for political reasons and arbitrariness administrator. All links will present later. Duo Fedor Babkin -Akim Dubrow opinion is subjectively.The Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin has repeatedly initiated destruction of famous Russian people from Wikipedia. Akim Dubrow been punished by blocking for insults and arbitrary behavior on the Wiki. Please administrators and authors to support the publication of article about Ramil Garifullin on Wikipedia.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich[edit]

You`ve deleted this article as G12. Unambiguous copyright infringement. Actually site traditio.org 1) is "anarchic" resource without any copyrights 2) Article is a copy of old ru:wikipedia`s version (now deleted). So explanation looks like "interwiki violate wikipedia`s copyright". It`s nonsence! I think it would better restore this article and continue discussion on proposed deletion and criteria that differ at tt:wiki (where article matches rules); ru:wiki (where was deleted) and en:wiki. With best regards, Rad8 (talk) 15:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, http://traditio-ru DOT org/wiki/Традиция:Отказ_от_ответственности says that "Site owners do not make any allegations of infringement quality materials posted on it. However, you should be aware that if you make changes to some sections of the site, these changes can then be used by his administration or third parties under GFDL".
  • Let's define: is article deleted for copyright, or we can consider it`s references and tone of it at article`s talk page? --Rad8 (talk) 06:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
traditio.org copied this text from wikipedia in 2013. There is one more site with same copy of former wikipedia`s article: http://www.millattashlar DOT ru/index.php/Гарифуллин_Рамиль_Рамзиевич . You can see wikipedia as source here and it was copied in 2012.
traditio.org uses wikipedia`s content, and positions it as GFDL. I`m not lawer but I don`t see any problems. This text is from wikipedia anyway. --Rad8 (talk) 13:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. -- dsprc [talk] 23:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 1994 appeared on TV as a presenter for channel [[:ru:Новый Век (Телерадиокомпания)|"Tatarstan"]] (programs “Vasha semya” ("Your family", Ваша семья) and “Kakie my?” ("What are we?", Какие мы?), [[:
  • of psychological and psychotherapeutic approaches to the problem of bribery and bribe-taking mania”(”Aktualnye Problemy Ekonomiki i Prava” (“Current Problems in Economics and Law”), no. 4(24), 2012,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://traditio-ru DOT org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C_%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87_%D0%93%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%84%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- dsprc [talk] 01:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please to support the publication of article about Ramil Garifullin on Wikipedia.[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garifullin_Ramil_Ramzievich Sorry for mistakes in English The article «Garifullin Ramil RamzIevich» has got in a contradictory situation, and had the following stages:1. After the publication of this article was edited by me in accordance with the requirements of administrators and users and was supported by the administrator (he removed the template modification). 2. After I started to post links to this article in Russian Wikipedia ancient my opponents Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin immediately began to remove these links, and there was a conflict (dialogue presents the Akim Dubrow on the website). 3.Fedor Babkin then immediately put the template for deletion of the article "Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich" in connection with the advertisement and previous deletion of this article in Russian Wikipedia. 4. You have deleted an article in connection with copying and copyright infringement. He appeared right after the discussion appeared remark about punishments Akim Dubrow rude and inadequate removal in Russian Wikipedia and the long-standing conflict Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin with participants, writing about Garifullin, and insults Akim Dubrow towards Garifullin. Although it was stated that there are seven days to fix the bugs. They look suspiciously was done quickly and without discussion. Why? Ramil Garifullin known personality in Russia thanks to extensive publications in the major media and a variety of books.Earlier article about Ramil Garifullina in Russian Wikipedia has been removed due to political motives, because of the publication of negative article about Edward Snowdon (in RBC)-This was proven when discussing article (Ramil Garifullin) in Russian Wikipedia. Article about Garifullin (Russian Wikipedia), which was in Russian Wikipedia four years has been deleted on the day of publication of the article about Snowden 16.07.2014. Information can be found in the discussion of removed Article. Duo Fedor Babkin -Akim Dubrow is a longtime opponents of Ramil Garifullin. Akim Dubrow repeatedly insulted Ramil Garifullina online, although he apologized for them. Publication of article about Ramil Garifullina - a political issue. By importance in the Russian Wikipedia Ramil Garifullin adequate, but was removed from - for political reasons and arbitrariness administrator. All links will present later. Duo Fedor Babkin -Akim Dubrow opinion is subjectively.The Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin has repeatedly initiated destruction of famous Russian people from Wikipedia. Akim Dubrow been punished by blocking for insults and arbitrary behavior on the Wiki. Please administrators and authors to support the publication of article about Ramil Garifullin on Wikipedia.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salam, Irek! First, there are some problems with your article and unclear license of copy of russian variant of this article from ru-wiki.
I`ve done https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Irek_Minnullin/Ramil_Garifullin You can work here with text to do it closer to tatar wikipedia (https://tt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рамил_Гарифуллин) and not similar to deleted russian wiki variant now placed at millattashlar and traditio-ru.
Then this text must be provided with independent verifiable sources and written without a promotional tone.
Maybe it will be easier open it than resore deleted variant?
And I don`t think that searching "ill-wishers" like "Duo Fedor Babkin -Akim Dubrow who persecute this article" is good idea. :) Let`s try write good perfect article. Rad8 (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you, Rad8. I would add that in case of further lies (article about Ramil Garifullina in Russian Wikipedia has been removed due to political motives - totally wrong) and insults (Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin has repeatedly initiated destruction of famous Russian people from Wikipedia - totally wrong) I will have to request administrative actions because of unethical behavior. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Аt the beginning of the article several times removed, but due to incorrect execution, and then four years was located (2009-2013) on Wikipedia and adminstrator evaluated her normal, but as soon as he became negative article about Snowden, it was immediately deleted. In 2013, was the recovery process articles and several administratorov support it, but because of the arbitrariness of one administrator article again removed. Still, there's more politics. Ramil Garifullin a well-known person in Russia, thanks to an independent opinion (see books about bluffing Russian politicians, about corruption, about Snowden) and you will understand what is the real cause.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 16:13, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As for me, deletions in 2009 was based on mistakes of novice, in 2013 - criteria was changed. I don`t welcome such changes, but done was done. Now let`s stop any prejudice?
How recovery procedure is set at en-wiki? --Rad8 (talk) 17:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article about Ramil Garifullin in Russian Wikipedia (ru:Гарифуллин,_Рамиль_Рамзиевич) was deleted several times by different administrators, then finally it underwent an assessment where another reputable administrator refused to restore it because of lack of notabiilty, evident conflict of interest and promotional style. Now the possibility of the creation of this article is blocked in Russian Wikipedia because of the repeated attempts to recreate it. As for the phrase The Duo Akim Dubrow-Fedor Babkin has repeatedly initiated destruction of famous Russian people from Wikipedia - it is absolutely wrong and insulting, it's a violation of ethical behavior. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 14:27, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed, at the beginning of the article several times removed, but due to incorrect execution, and then four years was located (2009-2013) on Wikipedia and adminstrator evaluated her normal, but as soon as he became negative article about Snowden, it was immediately deleted. In 2013, was the recovery process articles and several administratorov support it, but because of the arbitrariness of one administrator article again removed. Still, there's more politics. Ramil Garifullin a well-known person in Russia, thanks to an independent opinion (see books about bluffing Russian politicians, about corruption, about Snowden) and you will understand what is the real cause.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As for me, deletions in 2009 was based on mistakes of novice, in 2013 - criteria was changed. I don`t welcome such changes, but done was done. Well, what can we do for restoring of the article?--Rad8 (talk) 17:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems clear that, whatever other problems there may be that there, is no copyright violation.
  • The article is referenced and there is a claim of notability. If notability is to be challenged, it will need to be at Articles for Deletion review, Russian Wikipedia decisions are not binding here.
  • I'll therefore restore the page, but it may need further work
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:40, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear Jimfbleak. Advise. Once again sorry for the mistakes of the English language. To strengthen the articles I have created links to the article "Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich". For example, in the article "Alcohol_dependence" was a link to one of my books, but Fedor Babkin has deleted this link (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alcohol_dependence&action=history) Now I would again like to place a link in the article "Alcohol_dependence" on the well-known monograph (Garifullin R.R. Using coding therapy to treat alcohol and drug addiction. Manipulations in psychotherapy. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks, 2004. 256 p. ISBN 5-222-04382-7 ) which are trained many doctors in Russia (Garifullin has a sufficient level of scientific citation later will send). Fedor Babkin has no activity in the English Wikipedia, but this has a suspicious interest in articles about Garifullin systematically removes references in Wikipedia on scientific and journalistic articles is a famous author and scientist Garifullin. I wish you were asked not to participate in the discussion Duo Akim Dubrow - Fedor Babkin . Fedor Babkin is the assistant Akim Dubrow . While I respect the contribution of the Duo Akim Dubrow - Fedor Babkin in the development of Russian Wikipedia.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 07:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irek Minnullin (talk • contribs) 19:08, 11 July 2014‎[reply]
  • Your position clearly shows that you have serious WP:Conflict of interest. Why are you writing "For example, in the article "Alcohol_dependence" was a link to one of my books, but Fedor Babkin has deleted this link"? Is it really your book, and you are writing about yourself? Why did you delete my posting with the explanation of the actual reasons of the deletion of this article in Russian Wikipedia? --Fedor Babkin (talk) 06:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: repeated addition of inappropriate links to the article Neural engineering[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Neural engineering. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 14:41, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garifullin Ramil Ramzievich[edit]

  • The article appears to have been incorrectly tagged as a copyright violation, so it cannot be speedied on that basis
  • It makes a claim of notability, so can't be speedied on that basis
  • In my view, the article can only be removed via a WP:AFD discussion
  • Concerns about the behaviour of an editor should be reported here

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ramil Garifullin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:36, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?[edit]

Hello. Please clarify whether or not you have any conflict of interest with regard to Ramil Garifullin before editing the Ramil Garifullin article any further. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 07:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • In order to understand the reasons of occurrence of problems with this article, note the behavior of Fyodor Babkina:

1. First he put the tag on the lack of significance. Failed. 2. Then put a tag on a copy of the article. The administrator refused him. 3. Now he raised the issue of conflict of interest. Evaluate the behavior of Fyodor Babkina, provided that he has a low activity in the English Wikipedia. I myself independent from Garifullina the author. But I read on Wikipedia about the old conflict between Garifullina and tandem Akim Dubrov-Fedor Babkin. They have removed the article in Russian Wikipedia about Garifullina, which was posted for four years. Removed (see discussion) due to political reasons (article Garifullina about Snowden, removed on the same day it was released this article). I as an independent author wanted to support a well-known Russian psychologist. --Irek Minnullin (talk) 13:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking about problems in the article, I'm just asking whether you have any personal or professional connection to Garifullin. A simple yes or no will suffice. --McGeddon (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This link is the proof of the connection between Garifullin and Irek Minnullin, confirned by Irek Minnullin himself, and therefore the proof of the clear conflict of interest. --Fedor Babkin (talk) 15:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • No connection to me and Garifullin does not exist. Maybe it was a wrong translation.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 14:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify tag[edit]

The {{clarify}} template on the article means (as you will see if you click on it) that the sentence contains "wording that is likely to be confusing to the average reader", not that it is unsourced. What does "engaged in public work" mean? The article does not appear to mention any such work. --McGeddon (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have not professional ties with Garifullina. I simply think that the article is about the known psychologist Ramil Garifullina should be in Wikipedia.--Irek Minnullin (talk) 20:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Translation tag[edit]

The article seems poorly written in general, and with all the sources in Russian, an English speaker may introduce mistakes when trying to improve and clarify the wording of things. I don't understand what you mean by "some proposals that fail translation". --McGeddon (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Like I say, the article seemed poorly written in general when I added the tag. You're welcome to remove it if you feel that it has been resolved. --McGeddon (talk) 19:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramil Garifullin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramil Garifullin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramil Garifullin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akim Dubrow (talk) 16:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for WP:NOLEGALTHREATS. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unambiguous legal threat.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Irek_Minnullin&oldid=791805512"