User talk:Itastrowiki
Stefano Bianchi moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Stefano Bianchi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 15:41, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for rewieving the article. I will be happy to modify it in order to comply with WP policies. However, I'm not sure how I'm supposed to address the UPE/COI issue. It seems to me that most information in the article is properly referenced with independent and reliable sources. The only notable exception may be some biographical information taken directly from the personal website of the subject. Is that you are referring to? Should I find an independent source for that or remove it to submit it for a new review? Itastrowiki (talk) 16:21, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Itastrowiki, while reviewing the draft I have strong belief that you might have connected with the draft as WP:UPE. The high-resolution photograph of the subject person says a lot. Please reply honestly. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the draft! The high-resolution photo was taken directly from the personal website:
- https://sites.google.com/inaf.it/stefanobianchi
- Maybe should be referenced in this sense? Itastrowiki (talk) 10:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- But you have mentioned Source as your own work, which is clear WP:COPYVIO under WP:NFCI. You must delete the image as Wikipedia is strict against copyright violation. Again, you must declare WP:UPE or WP:COI on your homepage. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, my fault, sorry for that, I remove the image. I will carefully read the copyright rules to understand how can I have it back (if possible). Any help is appreciated. Itastrowiki (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- I understand you already started the procedure to remove it, so I don't have to do anything else. I see there's also a low-resolution picture here:
- https://www.uniroma3.it/en/persone/cVNTVWRYbm5qQlFYNnEwaXJGYTJiKzlWMXlqeVIxS1FJMEJGclJ4S283UT0=/profilo/
- Both pictures seem public to me, but I will read the copyright rules in Wikipedia and try t understand what I can do. Thanks! Itastrowiki (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have nominated the image for deletion and the deletion is done. Now you clarify about WP:UPE and WP:COI. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- If I understand it correctly, I am certainly not in a WP:PE situation, while I may be in the WP:COI state, since I know the subject of the draft. Itastrowiki (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Have you got paid to create the Stefano Bianchi article? And are you related to him? Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- No! Itastrowiki (talk) 10:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- If not, then how come your very first article is about a scholar? A new editor starts from little things, but you have started with a big one. How come? Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was an experiment, considering that other scholars have Wikipedia pages, and I was curious to see how the procedure worked, and how some scholars are considered of interest for Wikipedia and others not. It seems to me that it somehow depends on circumstances, apart from fulfilling some basic criteria. In this sense, whatever the final outcome, it was an interesting experiment. I would not consider it a 'big thing', it was simply a matter of using 2-3 templates of other astrophysicists and gather the information. Itastrowiki (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ref (references) should be after comma and period. Make the corrections and add his Google scholar profile in External link Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I will do it as soon as possible, then I will get back to you. Itastrowiki (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Done! Itastrowiki (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also remove hyperlinking in article body. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can you give me a specific example of what you are referring to? Itastrowiki (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- You said the article is your experiment, so you should know the basics of article creation and referencing to claims. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I will work on that later, and I'll let you know Itastrowiki (talk) 11:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- You said the article is your experiment, so you should know the basics of article creation and referencing to claims. Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:22, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- All external hyperlinks should be now under the 'External links', apart from the website in the info box. Itastrowiki (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Can you give me a specific example of what you are referring to? Itastrowiki (talk) 11:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ref (references) should be after comma and period. Make the corrections and add his Google scholar profile in External link Twinkle1990 (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was an experiment, considering that other scholars have Wikipedia pages, and I was curious to see how the procedure worked, and how some scholars are considered of interest for Wikipedia and others not. It seems to me that it somehow depends on circumstances, apart from fulfilling some basic criteria. In this sense, whatever the final outcome, it was an interesting experiment. I would not consider it a 'big thing', it was simply a matter of using 2-3 templates of other astrophysicists and gather the information. Itastrowiki (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- If not, then how come your very first article is about a scholar? A new editor starts from little things, but you have started with a big one. How come? Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- No! Itastrowiki (talk) 10:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Have you got paid to create the Stefano Bianchi article? And are you related to him? Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- If I understand it correctly, I am certainly not in a WP:PE situation, while I may be in the WP:COI state, since I know the subject of the draft. Itastrowiki (talk) 10:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- I have nominated the image for deletion and the deletion is done. Now you clarify about WP:UPE and WP:COI. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, my fault, sorry for that, I remove the image. I will carefully read the copyright rules to understand how can I have it back (if possible). Any help is appreciated. Itastrowiki (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- But you have mentioned Source as your own work, which is clear WP:COPYVIO under WP:NFCI. You must delete the image as Wikipedia is strict against copyright violation. Again, you must declare WP:UPE or WP:COI on your homepage. Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023[edit]
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Stefano Bianchi. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. You have accepted that you have violated copyright policy in this diff Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Stefano Bianchi has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creepTalk 21:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)