Jump to content

User talk:ItsMeKeys/Archive for november

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because your username is a clear violation of Wikipedia's username policy – it is obviously offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, disruptive, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ItsMeKeys (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

imade the mistake of making a trolling like username,and would like to change it and be unblocked

Decline reason:

Your actions from immediately before you registered your account show you intend to harm Wikipedia. Yamla (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
if i disrupt wikipedia again,i will not make a fuss about being unbanned.i do not intead to harm wikipedia any farthur,and i want to try to help instead of harm. i was trying to prove to a teacher that not h=just anyone can edit articals. Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
sorry about my bad spelling Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ItsMeKeys (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

i did not intead to harm wikipedia,i inteaded to preform an experiment to prove that wikipedia is a credible source by showing that harmful edits would be removed.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I really don't think there's any way to talk your way out of this block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
alright,but can i get my ip unbanned?its my school wifi Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
You don't. It's blocked to prevent you evading your block. --Yamla (talk) 14:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
but that means my whole school cant create an account... i regret what i did and it will not happen again Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 15:10, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Im just some stupid 12 year old who wanted to try something,but i know realize how disrespectful it is to vandilize the wikipedia ec=ncicliapedia.please Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a laboratory and its editors are not your experiment subjects. We are here to make good-faith efforts to build an encyclopedia. The editing community here takes a very dim view of individuals who cause wilful damage and intentional disruption to the project. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

i realize that and would like to become part of the editing community Disruptive edits are my jam (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ItsMeKeys (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

this is the last time i will ask.i made the mistake of harmfully diting wikipedia,and i deeply regret doing this is now i realize how disrectful this was.please,i am just some stupid 12 year old who got his schools ip banned from wikipedia

Accept reason:

See my response to your request below, which details my rationale for accepting your request. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
  • @Oshwah: OK, you probably know by now that I am much more inclined to give young editors another chance in this kind of situation than most administrators, so I won't be surprised if you just say "Absolutely no way". However, kids do stuff like this, and then decide to do better. I don't really swallow "an experiment to prove that wikipedia is a credible source", but I am willing to set that aside, and give the editor another chance, subject to a renaming, and on the understanding that any more of the same will lead to an indefinite block which will be unlikely to unblocked. Do you wish to express any opinion?
  • To the blocked editor: If your account is renamed and you then try to log in you will get a message saying that you have used the wrong username or password. That's no problem, because you can just log in with the new user name and the same password, but I like to warn editors about this before they are renamed, to avoid making them think they have blost access to their account. JBW (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
JBW - I thought you knew me better than that! :-P I feel the same way; I'm more inclined to give the rope than most other administrators. To me, if giving a user a second chance means that 5% of them take it seriously and become a prolific contributor and member of the community here, then I'll take that gamble. If we turn out to be simply played by a troll who's just trying to push their luck as far as possible, re-blocking them only takes a few seconds to do. Big whoop. ;-)
Disruptive edits are my jam - Your username obviously doesn't comply with Wikipedia's username policy, since it states a clear intention to abuse or disrupt Wikipedia. Even if you weren't even aware of Wikipedia's username policy, I believe that you very likely understood that your username was going to be seen unfavorably when you created your account. ;-) My thoughts aside, I do agree with the same principles and viewpoints that JBW described above when it come to giving hooligans a second chance (within reason, of course). Hence, I'm going to take a chance and accept your request. I am going to rename your account to the username you requested, and unblock your account. This will take place momentarily, just stand by for a few minutes.
IMPORTANT NOTE: Changing your account's username will purge all active sessions from your account as part of the process and while the username change is being deployed to Wikimedia's servers. This will cause you to be automatically logged out of your account while the username change is underway. When this happens, all you need to do is simply log back into your account. However, this is very important for you to know: When logging back into your account, you must enter your new username into the account sign-in page, not your old one. Otherwise, if you try logging back in with your old username, an "invalid username or password" error will be returned, since your old username won't exist anymore - it's been renamed to your new one. :-)
Stand by; I'm getting the wires ready to cross now... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
ItsMeKeys - All done! I've renamed and unblocked your account, and you are free to move about the cabin. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:43, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Since you have also identified as a minor, you should have a look at Wikipedia's guidance for younger editors. There is important information there to help you protect your privacy and personal safety, as well as advice for getting involved with editing (constructively). Best of luck. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 01:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thank you all so much! im sorry and i will contribute good things to wikipedia ItsMeKeys (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
im trying to add sources to the St. Antoninus Church but im nervous because the only source i can find is the actual website ItsMeKeys (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
im gonna go make some (constructive) edits to dip my toes into the water ItsMeKeys (talk) 14:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)