User talk:Itsbydesign/Archive1

I Look To You Tour

Why do you keep splitting the countries? it makes the page look a mess! Jayy008 (talk) 01:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Nothing But Love Tour

Please do not change the article around as you did. The Russian dates are not part of the official tour so they shouldn't be included as such. That's why they're separate. If you make the edits again it will be considered vandalism. Jayy008 (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Nothing But Love World Tour, you will be blocked from editing. You can't suggest nothing. You have vandalise the set-list also. The tour in Russia was called "I Look To You" tour which is why I separated it. It is sourced in the article and that's good enough for everyone else. Do it again, and you'll be blocked. Jayy008 (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

What you do on Wikipedia for a consensus, is bring it up for discussion on the page itself. Also, I have accepted your opinion and will await a discussion consensus, I have however added back all the information you randomly removed, and you call me a vandal and finally that edit war thing you're right to use, because you're not interested in speaking about it. The sources clearly state she performed two rehearsal dates in Russia under "I Look To You Tour" before an official commencement in February. The real title of the tour was announced at a later day. At first I agreed that they should be in the same part, then I thought because Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia it should give the correct information, as that's what people come here for, not personal opinion. Jayy008 (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Renaming of Rihanna: Live in Concert Tour (2006)

Hello. I noticed your recent work on the Rihanna: Live in Concert Tour and Rihanna 2006 Tour (and other Rihanna tour articles). You're doing what I consider good work. However, I see a problem with the recent edits you did to the two articles I mentioned.

First, you and User:Jagoperson seem to be the only two people arguing about the better name for the tour (and you take different views). As such, there's no consensus. (I also don't know which is better. Even the Def Jam ref for "More Rihanna Dates" doesn't mention a tour name.) So I think you need to work out any renaming proposals by discussion first.

Second, your latest edits leave the revision history kind of stranded in the wrong article (as warned against in WP:MOVE). What you want is that the article which has the name Rihanna 2006 Tour be a redirect to an article with the name Rihanna: Live in Concert Tour, which would have the real content. Unfortunately, you have just pasted the old content there (at Rihanna: Live in Concert Tour), and the real edit history behind that pasted-in version (and the Talk page that goes with that content) is missing. That's still back over at what's currently named Rihanna 2006 Tour.

Assuming you have consensus, you should swap the names back as at WP:SWAP, so that the article with the desired content has the full edit history and associated Talk page discussions. Where you go to get consensus is a bit of a problem right now, since it should happen at the article's Talk page, but you've redirected away from the "good" one (okay, there's not much there, either). Maybe you could revert your last edits (redirect and pasted content) until you've got a discussion at Talk:Rihanna 2006 Tour. And good luck, because I don't know anything about what the right name should be. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 07:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblock request

{{unblock|According to sockpuppet case, was informed by account was blocked due the behavioral patterns of other accounts (specifically due to Madonna related content). Whenever I make an edit, I always leave a detailed summary which these other accounts do not. There was no reasoning as to why each of four account mentioned in the case were included besides a vague reference to editing Madonna related articles. I was given zero notice that a case involving my account. I have made far better contributions to Wikipedia besides the 25 edits I've made to Madonna articles in nearly 11 months that I've had this account. I am requesting that my account be unblocked or be given in-depth explanation (along with evidence) as to why it was blocked. I have sent an email to the administrator who originally blocked my account but also wanted to post a notice on my talk page as well.}}

Blocking admin contacted, but they are not going to be available till the 6th of August at the earliest. --Taelus (Talk) 09:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Itsbydesign (talk) 06:45, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Shakira Tour

You're under the illusion that because there isn't a website source to back up the claim, what I'm claiming is not true. Wikipedia should use a range of sources not just websites. This includes books, journals, magazine, radio shows and interviews. I have a ticket for Shakira's show in the uk and I've sourced the information directly from that. The tour on Shakira's official websites says "Shakira 2010 dates". Hence the tour is named as it is. Yet the tickets for Europe specifically say "Seat Presents: Shakira Live 2010". If you search Google there is media coverage that Seat (The Car Manufacturer) is sponsoring the European Leg of Shakira's 2010 World Tour. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 17:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wh bercy ad.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wh bercy ad.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fixer23 (talk) 00:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tt wdt96.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tt wdt96.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:S lic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:S lic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tstm itwtp.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tstm itwtp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Medleys

As shown here the proper format for medleys is "Song A" / "Song B". That is because each song is a recording in its own rights but it is being performed as a single body of work. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

In that discussion the format for double A side songs is changing I was referencing the first comments by AnemoneProjectors. Both professionally in the music industry and on wikipedia medleys are always written as "Song A" / "Song B" / "Song C" etc. There's no reason valid or non-valid to change that. Listing them this way shows that they were performed as one work of it even though the medley consists of more than one registered legally and artistically registered works as its components. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 12:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Get Sleazy Tour, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

• When someones removed something, you do not add it back. It was removed due to unreliable references, eg: Youtube never to be used as a source. Dont add it again or you will be reported for WP:3RR and next time read edit summaries, "unreliable references and false information". - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Last warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Get Sleazy Tour. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

• Do you not listen? I have no patience for editors who disrupt articles. Revert your last edit now. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:40, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, no, I did not "listen" to you. All information included in the article come from reliable third party sources. Information was pulled from online editions of local newspapers and radio stations and also from the artist's (Kesha) official website. NOTHING I included in the article is neither false nor unreliable. Citing YouTube as an unreliable source is laughable. A video image of the artist announcing her tour is unreliable? Especially when the video is posted on a YouTube page the is supported and/or created by the artist's record company? You might want to pick another battle to fight.Itsbydesign (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

"Removed Cancellations and rescheduled per WP:CHRYSTAL and assume. Removed all $ per Wikipedia:MOSTM and Youtube per WP:TWITTER, its the same thing" is why i kept reverting. Ive added back most of you additions with the exceptions of above. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 21:19, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't wish to keep playing this game with you, however, I have undone two of your edits and my reasoning is as follows:

1. It clearly states in WP:TWITTER that self-publishing or questionable sources are allowed if (a) there is no doubt of its authenticity (of which the artist, Kesha, introduces herself and the site was created by a representative of RCA Records) and (b) the article is not based primarily on such sources (as it only references the notion of annoucing the tour via video message and reiterates the official title of the tour). The source is being used to confirm the statement written in the article, showing that Kesha (herself) annouced the tour via video message.

2. $ is not trademark and furthermore your evidence commonly refers to article titles. The $ used in subsitutuion for the "s" in the world "sleazy" is a play on style and characteration. It is referenced in the lead paragraph, as you can see is also done here, here and here.

3. I wanted to point out that WP:CBALL refers to claiming information is true when it can be proven to be false. In the cancellation section, I noted a date in Salt Lake City where the venue is selling tickets for a Kesha concert, however, the concert is not listed with Live Nation, Ticketmaster or on Kesha website. The moniker of "canceled date" will be removed and replaced with a simple note. However, this information was sourced and be understood by doing a tad bit more reading/investigating into the topic. Itsbydesign (talk) 22:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

You are now at 4RR. Please stop, im asking nicely, ive kept 99% of your additions, Youtube in not allowed per WP:GA and WP:FA articles, ive removed the note as it doesnt hurt anyone to wait until we know if its cancelled or not. By reverting to your additions you are also messing up the references which are also written in GA/FA standards, please dont revert again. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 22:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Get Sleazy Tour. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)