User talk:Ixtal/Archives/2022/October

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RfC closure at Talk:Jerusalem

With all due respect, this closure was a mistake. I know that consensus is more than a simple tally of !votes, but when determining consensus to change a long-standing status quo, if the numbers don't support the change, then the arguments need to be profound. This was clearly not the case here. I kindly ask that you please revert the closure and restore the images that you removed from the infobox against consensus. Thank you for your contributions to the project. GrammarDamner how are things? 05:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this at my talk page, GrammarDamner. What arguments provided by the supporters do you think I missed? What weaknesses in the opposers' arguments do you think I did not mention? I will not revert the closure if you aren't showing me why exactly my close was bad aside from a supposedly larger number of participants agreeing with (in my eyes) much weaker arguments. As it stands, I'm not convinced there is a need to amend, much less revert, my closure. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. 11:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
All you've done is simply stated that you agreed with one side of the RfC. You said, including them would give legitimacy to one claim above another, this is absolutely false. The very idea that including something in an encyclopedia article gives legitimacy to its political claim is false. You said, Supporters of inclusion failed to advocate successfully against this argument, this is your opinion, and the majority of editors who participated in the RfC disagree with that opinion. I could go on and on, but the fact is that this RfC did not reach the level of consensus required to change a long-standing status quo. Obviously this is a touchy subject, so thank you for handling a task that we all know is not enjoyable. GrammarDamner how are things? 07:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
The full quote is Editors objecting to the inclusion of the flag and coat of arms in the infobox raised the point that including them would give legitimacy to one claim above another (namely, the Israeli over the Palestinian claim) in violation of both established consensus on the issue here on Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem) and our neutral point of view policy. When I said Supporters of inclusion failed to advocate successfully against this argument, I was referring to the policy and previous consensus argument. My closure was based on two things: firstly, what are the policies and guidelines/wide consensus discussions relevant to this discussion that would weigh on any closure. Supporters did not provide any strong PAG-based arguments and so I wrote they failed to advocate successfully. Secondly, if there is widely-supported and well-reasoned consensus to make an exception to PAG in the interest of encyclopedic coverage or to establish a new consensus on the issue. There was no strong consensus that the 2013 Jerusalem RFC did not reflect the reliable sources anymore or that there was any benefit to giving more weight to the Israeli claim.
You see the long-standing status quo as the presence of the flag and coat of arms, but I see the status quo as the impartial coverage of the Jerusalem territorial dispute between Israel and Palestine. Thus, while you see no strong consensus to overturn your status quo, neither do I see strong consensus to overturn mine. Consequently I don't think we'll convince each other on the closure issue. However, I will request a closure review at WP:AN per Wikipedia:Closing_discussions#Challenging_other_closures. I have the same interest as you do in making sure that closures in this topic area are well-reasoned and appropriate, so if AN has consensus I erred in my closure I'll be more than happy to revert it then. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. 10:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, I appreciate you requesting a closure review. GrammarDamner how are things? 05:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Apologies to Ixtal, who, I suspect, would prefer for there not to be an outbreak of the Jerusalem symbols argument at his user talkpage, but since an AN discussion on the closure has been started, I hope that I'll be forgiven make a few observations here.
The arguments made for retention of the "status quo" were largely similar in nature to ones made for stating factually that Jerusalem is Israel's capital in the RFC on the article's introduction. They bypassed consideration of neutrality, arguing that the article should reflect reality and advanced partisan claims, such as that nations get to choose their own capitals. They failed to gain traction then.
Your own argument was largely based on taking one example, Taiwan, and claiming that its situation is "almost identical" to Jerusalem's: "One country claims a certain area, while another country controls it." I tried to demonstrate the falsity of that claim. You presented Taiwan as though it is an independent state encroached upon by the People's Republic. China is actually a country in which two regimes contend to be the legitimate rulers of the whole, each being in control of different areas. Until the early 1970s, the regime in Taiwan was widely seen as the proper successor of the Republic of China, instituted in 1912, and represented China on the UN Security Council. I presented other countries, arguing that their situation was similar to Taiwan's, which you rejected. As an example involving China which I felt was more appropriate, I mentioned Tibet, in which article there were arguments over the display of the flag of the People's Republic, with the depiction of that flag ultimately being removed. You dismissed Tibet as just a province of China, ignoring that it declared itself independent in 1913 and existed as such until 1951 when it was invaded by the People's Republic, a revolt being crushed in 1959. I also gave the example of Northern Ireland, in which article no flag is shown in the infobox. When the survey was closed, I was in the process of writing a rebuttal of your last comment.
Your objection to the closure decision mentions "status quo". I have been involved in the Jerusalem article since, probably, 2007 or 2008. I can't remember any discussion of the depictions of the flag or emblem in the infobox in that time. That would have been a minor sideshow compared to the overturning of the consensus which a group of like-minded individuals claimed to have established in 2003 (or thereabouts), that the article should state as fact, in the Introduction and infobox, that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. After ten years of arguments, that was finally overturned in 2013 when a formal RFC was held. I'd take a guess that, in 2013, the number of editors !voting to keep the original form of the article outnumbered those against. Yet, the decision went in favour of the latter. I can't remember any arguments being made that the original form had been the "status quo" so long that the reasons for altering it had to be far "profounder."
For me, retaining the symbols in the infobox, but labelling them to identify them as Israeli, was an acceptable option. Starting a discussion on doing that would be one way forward. Nobody argued in favour of removing the symbols from the article altogether, just not for displaying them as they were.
    ←   ZScarpia   12:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Echo?

Reading too fast? Did you notice that your comment at Talk:Trans woman is nearly a duplicate of Loki's last sentence? If nobody has responded, WP:REDACT doesn't apply, and you could modify it (or even remove it) if you want to. Mathglot (talk) 05:22, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

I'll check it out later, thanks for the message, Mathglot. Hope you had a good weekend :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. 06:15, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Grey's Monument on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:St Mary's Church, Rolleston on Dove on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Normandy on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Construction of the Minnesota State Capitol on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gürdal Duyar on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Studio 54 on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
72 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Position (finance) (talk) Add sources
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub The Burroughs File (talk) Add sources
1,382 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Abortion law (talk) Add sources
1,997 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Studio 54 (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C George Chauncey (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Breton Democratic Union (talk) Add sources
20 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Assabet River (talk) Cleanup
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Traianopolis (Phrygia) (talk) Cleanup
2,433 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B 2011 Norway attacks (talk) Cleanup
5,744 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA Nancy Pelosi (talk) Expand
18,258 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Nasdaq (talk) Expand
100 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Timeline of the Mexican drug war (talk) Expand
22 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Jorge Ángel Livraga Rizzi (talk) Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Prince of Asturias Cup (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Lands of Tour and Kirkland (talk) Unencyclopaedic
24,907 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Reactions to the death of Elizabeth II (talk) Merge
75 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Vedic wedding ceremony (talk) Merge
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Fitness fashion (talk) Merge
147 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Berdychiv (talk) Wikify
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Pavlina R. Tcherneva (talk) Wikify
424 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Amos 'n' Andy (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kari Jaquesson (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Eurasia Insurance Company (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Rajendra Nagar, Lucknow (talk) Orphan
26 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Considerations on Representative Government (talk) Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hinda Miller (talk) Stub
32 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Abortion in San Marino (talk) Stub
55 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Layla bint Abi Murrah al-Thaqafi (talk) Stub
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Indication of interest (talk) Stub
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Tahar Djaout (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:St. Mary's-in-Tuxedo on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Art and architecture Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:New Victory Theater on a "Art and architecture" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can.

Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wikipedia:WikiProject Finance & Investment/Introduction for new editors

Hello, Ixtal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Introduction for new editors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ixtal/Archives/2022/October&oldid=1122930066"