User talk:JEQuidam

Please note that Wikipedia does not accept advertising, whether political or otherwise. Your article was also unsourced and unencyclopaedic Jimfbleak (talk) 16:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Using your user page to spam is also unacceptable. Please stop. Jimfbleak (talk) 16:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you also plan to delete the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moveon.org page as well?

Please explain your rules of censorship.

It's not censorship, assuming that's what you mean. Wikipedia does not provide free advertising space. It accepts articles that are encyclopaedic in tone, not copyright, sourced with verifiable references and notable. it carries articles on many political parties, philosophies, etc, but it is an encylopaedia not a blog. Jimfbleak (talk) 17:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at Moveon. It is referenced, neutral in tone, and even has a criticism section. So no, I don't think it's a speedy deletion. Jimfbleak (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quidam: OK, if it's not censorship, could I prevail upon you, or could you suggest someone, who could write an article that does not look like "advertising"?

Your article JEQuidam[edit]

You created an article "JEQuidam". Since it was headed with the {{userpage}} template, I presume you meant it to be your user page, and I have moved it there. JohnCD (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you JEQuidam (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)JEQuidam[reply]

Re: Thirty-Thousand.org[edit]

I opened the possibility of recreation if you create a userspace version first so I can determine if the new version will in fact meet inclusion criteria. Additionally, you seem to have a problem with the original deletion, so your best bet might be to talk the the deleting admin or bring the situation to deletion review where other editors can determine if they think the recreation of the article should be allowed or not (I personally have no opinion). If it results in allow recreation, then the page will be unprotected. As I said, however, I recommend creating a userspace version first. VegaDark (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

VegaDark -- my apoligies: I confused you with the original Censor (who deleted the article). I see that you are a law student, that is more appropriate for this subject. I encourage you to read this article: http://enlargethehouse.blogtownhall.com/ JEQuidam (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)JEQuidam[reply]

If I can make a constructive suggestion, you are probably better to move your work-in-progress to your sandbox rather than do it on your user page. Jimfbleak (talk) 08:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]